New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence: 12(b)(6) Motion: While Doctrine of Completeness Applies to Docs Fraud Claims Are ”Based On”, It Doesn’t Apply If Doc. Merely Cited in Complaint — No Notice of Def. Corp’s Own Website

Sturgeon v. Pharmerica Corp., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21935, 2020 WL 586978 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2020) (note: a different portion of this Opinion is excerpted in our Feb. 10, 2020 post): Relators Lena Stu ...
Sturgeon v. Pharmerica Corp., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21935, 2020 WL 586978 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2020) (note: a different portion of this Opinion is excerpted in our Feb. 10, 2020 post): Relators Lena Sturgeon, Anthony Ferrante, Anthony Sciole,…
Continue Reading

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence: Info on Government Website Is Self-Authenticating, Subject to Judicial Notice — On 12(b)(6) Motion, Notice Taken Only for Existence, Not Truth, to Avoid Barring Proof on Central Issue

Sturgeon v. Pharmerica Corp., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21935, 2020 WL 586978 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2020): *** B. Administrative Reports Courts may al ...
Sturgeon v. Pharmerica Corp., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21935, 2020 WL 586978 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2020): *** B. Administrative Reports Courts may also take judicial notice of “records and reports of administrative bodies.”69 PharMerica requests judicial notice…
Continue Reading

RICO Statute of Limitations — Plaintiff Who Is Not Reasonably Diligent Cannot Assert Fraudulent Concealment Or Successfully Invoke Equitable Estoppel, Tolling

Youngblook-West v. Aflac Inc., 2019 WL 6769751 (11th Cir. Dec. 12, 2019) (unpublished): *1 Leigh Ann Youngblood-West appeals the denial of her motion for recusal and the dismissal of her complaint of conspiracy and of racketeering activities in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act by Afl ...
Youngblook-West v. Aflac Inc., 2019 WL 6769751 (11th Cir. Dec. 12, 2019) (unpublished): *1 Leigh Ann Youngblood-West appeals the denial of her motion for recusal and the dismissal of her complaint of conspiracy and of racketeering activities in violation of…
Continue Reading

Removal Does Not Waive Personal Jurisdiction (PJ) Defense — Nor Does Pre-Complaint Discovery If Def. Can’t Raise PJ Then — While Court Must Consider Transfer under §1631 If No PJD & Alternate Forum ID’ed, Not So If Plaintiff Can Refile There

Danziger & De Llano, LLP v. Morgan Verkamp LLC, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1382 (3d Cir. Jan. 15, 2020): Removal to federal court changes the field of play, but not the game being played. Two law firms, Dan ...
Danziger & De Llano, LLP v. Morgan Verkamp LLC, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1382 (3d Cir. Jan. 15, 2020): Removal to federal court changes the field of play, but not the game being played. Two law firms, Danziger and Morgan …
Continue Reading

No 37(e) Spoliation Sanctions Where Video Destroyed in Ordinary Course Before Litigation Reasonably Foreseeable (Thus, Video = ESI, Not Tangible Evidence)

 Ball v. George Wash. Univ., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 3241 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 3, 2020) (unpublished): This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and ...
Ball v. George Wash. Univ., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 3241 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 3, 2020) (unpublished): This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs filed by the…
Continue Reading

Photos of Texts Extracted Using Cellebright UFED = Admissions, Authenticated by Location on Sender & Recipient Phones, Accurate Identification of “Mom” on One, Contents (Remember Rule 902(14) in Federal Court)

 State v. Panzeca, 2020-Ohio-326 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 3, 2020) : [*P1]  Appellant, Amy Lea Panzeca, appeals her conviction in the Warren County Court of Common Pleas after the trial court f ...
State v. Panzeca, 2020-Ohio-326 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 3, 2020) : [*P1]  Appellant, Amy Lea Panzeca, appeals her conviction in the Warren County Court of Common Pleas after the trial court found her guilty of two counts of permitting drug…
Continue Reading

Sanctions: Relative Culpability Irrelevant — Default (1) Apt for Obstruction, (2) & 7th Amendment Jury Trial Right, (3) Factors — Sanctions Veil Piercing Must Meet Normal Requirements — If No Judgment Entered (& Needed), Appeal within 180 Days

 KCI USA, Inc. v. Healthcare Essentials, Inc., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 3129 (6th Cir. Jan 28, 2020) (upublished) (Note:  see our Jan. 22, 2020, post for the opinion vacating certain sanctions on defense counsel): ...
KCI USA, Inc. v. Healthcare Essentials, Inc., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 3129 (6th Cir. Jan 28, 2020) (upublished) (Note:  see our Jan. 22, 2020, post for the opinion vacating certain sanctions on defense counsel): Colin Tennebar flouted court orders to …
Continue Reading

Sanctions: §1927 for Filing Premature Notice of Appeal to Delay District Court Proceedings — No 37(c)(1) Preclusion Despite Failure to ID Witnesses in Initial Disclosures: Harmless Error Where All ID’ed in Trial Brief

Hannah v. Walmart Stores, Inc., 2020 WL 521848 (2d Cir. Feb. 3, 2020) (unpublished): *1 ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the orders and judgment of said District Court be and they hereby are AFFIRMED. Appellants-Cross-Appellees Kim H ...
Hannah v. Walmart Stores, Inc., 2020 WL 521848 (2d Cir. Feb. 3, 2020) (unpublished): *1 ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the orders and judgment of said District Court be and they hereby are AFFIRMED…
Continue Reading

No Contempt for Violating Settlement Agmt. (SA), But If SA Allows Court to Order Compliance, Contempt for Violating Order OK — Civil v. Crim Contempt (Factors): Line Can Blur in Complex Injn Cases — Fines as Compensatory

 Parsons v. Ryan, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 2837 (9th Cir. Jan. 29, 2020): The consolidated appeals in this comeback case arise from a class-action by prisoners in the custody of the Arizona Department of Correct ...
Parsons v. Ryan, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 2837 (9th Cir. Jan. 29, 2020): The consolidated appeals in this comeback case arise from a class-action by prisoners in the custody of the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC) against senior ADC officials…
Continue Reading

Criminal Antitrust (Sherman): Federal Funds = Interstate Commerce — Bid-Rigging Implies Price Fixing — Reasonableness Irrelevant to Per Se Violation — Summary Chart Probative, Not 403 with Cautionary Instruction

United States v. Vega-Martinez, 2020 WL 502538 (1st Cir. Jan. 31, 2020): *1 The two appellants in this case are school-bus operators who contracted with the Caguas, Puerto Rico municipal school system to drive school children to and from school each day. Instead of competing w ...
United States v. Vega-Martinez, 2020 WL 502538 (1st Cir. Jan. 31, 2020): *1 The two appellants in this case are school-bus operators who contracted with the Caguas, Puerto Rico municipal school system to drive school children to and from school …
Continue Reading
Previous31323334353637Next

Recent Posts

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

There Is No Good-Faith Defense For Issuing An Overly Burdensome Subpoena

Purposes of Rule 37 and Section 1927 Sanctions

While Rule 11 Doesn’t Apply to Appellate Proceedings (Unless It Has Been Incorporated in Local Appellate Rules), Rule 11 Caselaw Is Looked to for Guidance in Interpreting Applicable Sanctions Powers on Appeal

Rule 11 Sanctions & Appellate Review: Abuse of Discretion Standard Applies Unless Sanctions Are Based Solely (Not Just in Part) on Legal Issues, in Which Case Review Is De Novo

Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions for Altering Expert’s 26(a)(2)(B) Report — Without the Expert’s Knowledge or Approval — by Converting It from PDF to Word, Changing Headings and Other Formatting, and Omitting a Page of Relevant Text and Appendices, Even Though Expert Testified That The Overall Substance of the Report Was Unchanged — Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions May Be Reversed If Failure to Comply with Discovery Order Was Due to Misunderstanding or Inability to Comply

Spoliation: Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) Imposes a Higher Standard — Intent — Than Fourth Circuit Law Previously Applied to Spoliation of Electronically-Stored Information (And Still Does As to Non-ESI) — Willfulness vs. Intent

Inherent Power and § 1927 Sanctions: Removal of counsel from case, referral for disciplinary action, and award of fees and costs for assaulting opposing counsel at deposition — Failure to request hearing waive any right to a hearing — Notice and opportunity to be heard required before sua sponte sanctions imposed, whether under Rule 11, the inherent power of the court or § 1927 — Notice may come from court or opposing counsel — Order imposing sanctions cannot provide notice of sanctions — Nature of bad faith requirement for inherent power sanctions: bad faith to obstruct the judicial process or bring about violation of a court order — Sanctions proceeding need not defer (Younger abstention) to disciplinary proceeding involving the same conduct — Sanctions proceeding doesn’t threaten to interfere with disciplinary proceeding — Why District Court is accorded significant deference in matters concerning attorney’s fees

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice