New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Social Media Authentication: Mycelium & Text Messages Set Time & Place for Meeting, Defendant Comes — Phone GPS App Used Regularly, Found Accurate — Facebook Profiles Found by Search for Phone Nos. Provided by Def. to Victim

 Scott v. State, 2020 Nev. App. Unpub. LEXIS 108 (Nev. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2020) (unpublished): ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE James Scott appeals from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a jury ...
Scott v. State, 2020 Nev. App. Unpub. LEXIS 108 (Nev. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2020) (unpublished): ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE James Scott appeals from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a jury verdict of conspiracy to commit robbery, robbery, and…
Continue Reading

Sanctions & Post-Judgment Settlement: Parties May Seek to Eliminate Monetary Aspect of Sanction under Rule 60(b)(5) (& Can Moot $ Via Release), But Court May Refuse to Erase Sanctions Ruling — Exceptional Circumstances Standard

 Banik v. Ybarra, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4889 (5th Cir. Feb. 13, 2020)(unpublished): Before KING, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: * * ...
Banik v. Ybarra, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4889 (5th Cir. Feb. 13, 2020)(unpublished): Before KING, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: * * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should…
Continue Reading

Attorney-Client Privilege Not Waived by Official Acknowledgment But Maybe by Public Reliance & Definitely by Adoption As Effective Law & Policy — Deliberative Process Privilege: Factors, Exceptions

 ACLU v. NSA, 925 F.3d 576 (2d Cir. May 30, 2019): The American people have the right to know [**3]  the laws and policies that bind our government and its agencies. At the same time, government of ...
ACLU v. NSA, 925 F.3d 576 (2d Cir. May 30, 2019): The American people have the right to know [**3]  the laws and policies that bind our government and its agencies. At the same time, government officials must be able …
Continue Reading

RICO Pattern: Plaintiff Can’t Fragment One Act into Many (Via Mail Fraud) to Invoke RICO — After 3 Bites at Apple, OK to Deny Leave to Amend (Good Quotes) — Appeal from Reconsideration W/ONew Facts Reviewed as Appeal from Judgment

. Biwen Liang v. Home Reno Concepts, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4805 (2d Cir. Feb. 14, 2020) (unpublished): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGE ...
. Biwen Liang v. Home Reno Concepts, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4805 (2d Cir. Feb. 14, 2020) (unpublished): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the orders of the district court are AFFIRMED.…
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions OK for Prelitigation Misconduct Relating to Bringing, Maintaining, or Defending the Suit, and Which Undermines Integrity of Judicial Process — Dismissal Factors (5th Cir.) — Hearing on Reconsideration Satisfies Due Process

Snider v. L-3 Commc’ns Vertex Aerospace, LLC, 2019 WL 7344908 (5th Cir. Dec. 31, 2019): *1 This suit was initiated when Courtney Paine Snider filed a complaint under Title VII of the Equal Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)1 against L-3 Communicati ...
Snider v. L-3 Commc’ns Vertex Aerospace, LLC, 2019 WL 7344908 (5th Cir. Dec. 31, 2019): *1 This suit was initiated when Courtney Paine Snider filed a complaint under Title VII of the Equal Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)1…
Continue Reading

RICO: 2 Years Necessary, Not Sufficient for Closed-End Continuity (2d Cir.); Factors — Mail, Wire Fraud “Particularly Scrutinized” (Good Quote) — 2 Types of Open-Ended: Inherently Unlawful Or Non-Conclusory Regular Way of Doing Business

 Grace Int'l Assembly of God v. Festa, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 38777 (2d Cir. Dec. 30, 2019) (unpublished): UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judg ...
Grace Int'l Assembly of God v. Festa, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 38777 (2d Cir. Dec. 30, 2019) (unpublished): UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff-Appellant Grace…
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions: Court Lacks Authority to Ignore Statute to Punish Executive Branch Conduct, Cannot Use Sanction to Grant or Explain Grant of Order Precluded by Statute

  Hamama v. Adducci, 2020 WL 39020 (6th Cir. Jan. 3, 2020): *1 Last time around, we held that Congress removed jurisdiction from the district courts to enter class-wide injunctions restraining the enforcement of the following immigration statutes:
Hamama v. Adducci, 2020 WL 39020 (6th Cir. Jan. 3, 2020): *1 Last time around, we held that Congress removed jurisdiction from the district courts to enter class-wide injunctions restraining the enforcement of the following immigration statutes: 8 U.S.C. §§ …
Continue Reading

Rooker-Feldman Applies to State-Court Loser Injured by State-Court Judgment: That Is A Narrow Situation, So Narrow The S.Ct. Has Applied It Just Twice in A Century … So Far Just to People Named Rooker or Feldman (Good Quote)

*1 A lawyer sued two lawyers, and each side hired more lawyers. Five years later, after “Stalingrad litigation” tactics, discovery sanctions, and dueling allegations of professional misconduct, we are left with $3,662 in damages and roughly $180,000 in attorney’s fees. We vacate and remand. I. Maureen Van Hove ...
*1 A lawyer sued two lawyers, and each side hired more lawyers. Five years later, after “Stalingrad litigation” tactics, discovery sanctions, and dueling allegations of professional misconduct, we are left with $3,662 in damages and roughly $180,000 in attorney’s fees. …
Continue Reading

YouTube Videos: Authenticity of Account, Ownership Irrelevant — Questions re Date Posted, Etc., Go Only to Weight — Fair & Accurate Portrayal Test — Comprehensive Collection of YouTube Authenticity Case Law

 State v. Javon Jolarry Spivey, 2020 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 74 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2020): A Davidson County Criminal Court Jury convicted the Appellant, Javon Jolarry Spivey, of first degree premeditated ...
State v. Javon Jolarry Spivey, 2020 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 74 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2020): A Davidson County Criminal Court Jury convicted the Appellant, Javon Jolarry Spivey, of first degree premeditated murder, felony murder, attempted first degree murder,…
Continue Reading

Arbitration Award Not Reviewable for Legal or Factual Errors, Only FAA §10(a) Grounds — Vacatur for Exceeding Powers Requires Decision on Unsubmitted Issue Or Irrational Award — Meaning of Manifest Disregard, If It Survives

 PNY Techs. v. Netac Tech. Co., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4003 (10th Cir. Feb. 10, 2020): *** "On appeal from a district court's ruling on a motion to confirm or vacate an arbitration [*4]  awar ...
PNY Techs. v. Netac Tech. Co., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4003 (10th Cir. Feb. 10, 2020): *** "On appeal from a district court's ruling on a motion to confirm or vacate an arbitration [*4]  award, we review its legal conclusions…
Continue Reading
Previous30313233343536Next

Recent Posts

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

There Is No Good-Faith Defense For Issuing An Overly Burdensome Subpoena

Purposes of Rule 37 and Section 1927 Sanctions

While Rule 11 Doesn’t Apply to Appellate Proceedings (Unless It Has Been Incorporated in Local Appellate Rules), Rule 11 Caselaw Is Looked to for Guidance in Interpreting Applicable Sanctions Powers on Appeal

Rule 11 Sanctions & Appellate Review: Abuse of Discretion Standard Applies Unless Sanctions Are Based Solely (Not Just in Part) on Legal Issues, in Which Case Review Is De Novo

Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions for Altering Expert’s 26(a)(2)(B) Report — Without the Expert’s Knowledge or Approval — by Converting It from PDF to Word, Changing Headings and Other Formatting, and Omitting a Page of Relevant Text and Appendices, Even Though Expert Testified That The Overall Substance of the Report Was Unchanged — Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions May Be Reversed If Failure to Comply with Discovery Order Was Due to Misunderstanding or Inability to Comply

Spoliation: Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) Imposes a Higher Standard — Intent — Than Fourth Circuit Law Previously Applied to Spoliation of Electronically-Stored Information (And Still Does As to Non-ESI) — Willfulness vs. Intent

Inherent Power and § 1927 Sanctions: Removal of counsel from case, referral for disciplinary action, and award of fees and costs for assaulting opposing counsel at deposition — Failure to request hearing waive any right to a hearing — Notice and opportunity to be heard required before sua sponte sanctions imposed, whether under Rule 11, the inherent power of the court or § 1927 — Notice may come from court or opposing counsel — Order imposing sanctions cannot provide notice of sanctions — Nature of bad faith requirement for inherent power sanctions: bad faith to obstruct the judicial process or bring about violation of a court order — Sanctions proceeding need not defer (Younger abstention) to disciplinary proceeding involving the same conduct — Sanctions proceeding doesn’t threaten to interfere with disciplinary proceeding — Why District Court is accorded significant deference in matters concerning attorney’s fees

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice