New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Electronic Hearsay: Fact Business Keeps and Receives Emails Doesn’t Make Them Business Records (Good Quote) — 803(6) Elements Must Be Satisfied — Business Records Exception Is Predicated on Accuracy & Reliability; Email Is Typically More Casual

United States v. Cone, 714 F.3d 197 (4th Cir. 2013): Donald Cone and Chun-Yu Zhao were convicted of various charges under an indictment arising out of a scheme to import and resell counterfeit pieces of computer networking equipment, some of which bore the trademark of Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"). On appea ...
United States v. Cone, 714 F.3d 197 (4th Cir. 2013): Donald Cone and Chun-Yu Zhao were convicted of various charges under an indictment arising out of a scheme to import and resell counterfeit pieces of computer networking equipment, some of …
Continue Reading

Rule 37 & 41 Sanctions — Reversible Error to Dismiss without Considering Lesser Sanctions — 6th Circuit Leaves Open Possibility Dismissal Might Be OK for Discovery Delay Absent Violation of Court Order in Extreme Circumstances

Dominguez v. Crosby Tugs, LLC, 2017 WL 3271117 (5th Cir. Aug. 1, 2017): Jorge Dominguez, Jr., a Jones Act seaman employed by Crosby Tugs (“Crosby”), was allegedly injured when he was directed to manually move a marine fire extinguisher. Dominguez brought a personal injury suit against Crosby.
Dominguez v. Crosby Tugs, LLC, 2017 WL 3271117 (5th Cir. Aug. 1, 2017): Jorge Dominguez, Jr., a Jones Act seaman employed by Crosby Tugs (“Crosby”), was allegedly injured when he was directed to manually move a marine fire extinguisher. Dominguez …
Continue Reading

Texts – Admissibility: Recipient May Testify As to Contents of Lost Text Per Rule 1004 Consistently with Best Evidence Rule — “We Will Not Reverse the Trial Court When It Reached the Right Result Albeit for the Wrong Reason” (Good Quote)

People v Washington, 2017 Mich. App. LEXIS 1774 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2017): A jury convicted defendant of two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct (victim under 13/defendant 17 or older) (CSC-I),
People v Washington, 2017 Mich. App. LEXIS 1774 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2017): A jury convicted defendant of two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct (victim under 13/defendant 17 or older) (CSC-I), MCL 750.520b(2)(b); assault with intent to…
Continue Reading

§ 1927 Sanctions Do Not Require a Finding of Subjective Bad Faith in Seventh Circuit

Pintea v. Gurvey, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12444 (7th Cir. July 12, 2017): Adrian and Marinela Pintea are first-generation immigrants of Romanian origin who owned their primary residence in Chicago and a smaller rental property nearby. At some point they defaulted on their mortgage and both properties fell into foreclosure. As is the case ...
Pintea v. Gurvey, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12444 (7th Cir. July 12, 2017): Adrian and Marinela Pintea are first-generation immigrants of Romanian origin who owned their primary residence in Chicago and a smaller rental property nearby. At some point they…
Continue Reading

RICO: 171 Pp. of Vague Allegations, Each Count Adopting Prior ¶¶=Shotgun Pleading, Violates Rule 8—Abstention: Younger Applies to Civil Case Only If St. Court’s Ability to Perform Judicial Fxs Involved—Colorado River Very Rare

Barone v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18396 (11th Cir. Sept. 21, 2017): John M. Barone, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint alleging various wrongful acts by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), after it acquired Barone's mortgage in 2008. Th ...
Barone v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18396 (11th Cir. Sept. 21, 2017): John M. Barone, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint alleging various wrongful acts by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells …
Continue Reading

Rule 16: What Constitutes “Good Cause” to Amend Scheduling Order to Allow Late Designation of Expert — Five Factors (6th Cir.), Diligence Key — Appeals: Waiver of Argument by Not Raising It Below — Plain-Miscarriage-of-Justice Exception

Gatza v. DCC Litig. Facility, Inc., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21861 (6th Cir. Oct. 31, 2017): Plaintiffs-Appellants Kathy Gatza and Pamela Sutherland (together, "Plaintiffs") appeal the district court's denial of their motions to amend the scheduling orders in their cases. Before the expert-disclosure deadlines passed ...
Gatza v. DCC Litig. Facility, Inc., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21861 (6th Cir. Oct. 31, 2017): Plaintiffs-Appellants Kathy Gatza and Pamela Sutherland (together, "Plaintiffs") appeal the district court's denial of their motions to amend the scheduling orders in their cases.…
Continue Reading

Removal: Where Statute Authorizes Fees, The Fee Claim Is Included in Amount in Controversy — But Is It Only Already-Accrued Fees or Prospective Fees, Too? — Circuit Split

Skau v JBS Carriers, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197232 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 30, 3017): This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion for remand (Dkt. No. 13). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby GRANTS the motion as it relates ...
Skau v JBS Carriers, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197232 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 30, 3017): This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion for remand (Dkt. No. 13). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the…
Continue Reading

Hearsay: Importance of Specificity to 803(3) (State of Mind) Foundation — Settlement Negotiations: Rule 408 Doesn’t Bar Evidence Party Acknowledged a Fact at Settlement Meeting That It Now Denies

Fabick, Inc. v. Fabco Equip., Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198963 (wdwis Dec. 4, 2017): This case is set for a jury trial commencing, December 11, 2017, to resolve plaintiff Fabick, In ...
Fabick, Inc. v. Fabco Equip., Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198963 (wdwis Dec. 4, 2017): This case is set for a jury trial commencing, December 11, 2017, to resolve plaintiff Fabick, Inc.'s remaining claims of trademark infringement against defendants…
Continue Reading

FRAP 38 Sanctions Don’t Require Bad Faith But 6th Cir. Only Imposes If Improper Purpose — §1927 Sanctions Don’t Require Bad Faith in 6th Cir., But Still > Negligence: Intentional Abuse of Judicial Process/Knowing Disregard of Multiplicitousness

Raub v. Moon Lake Prop Owners’ Ass’n, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22933 (6th Cir. Nov. 15, 2017): Plaintiffs David and William Raub appeal the dismissal of their action asserting various civil rights and disability discrimination claims arising from their ownership of lots and membership in a property owners' association. Defendants ...
Raub v. Moon Lake Prop Owners’ Ass’n, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22933 (6th Cir. Nov. 15, 2017): Plaintiffs David and William Raub appeal the dismissal of their action asserting various civil rights and disability discrimination claims arising from their ownership…
Continue Reading

Res Judicata / Collateral Estoppel: Claims within Exclusive Jurisdiction of Federal Courts Generally Not Barred by Prior State Court Case Arising Out of Common Nucleus of Operative Fact — FRAP 38: Partial Success on Appeal Avoids Sanctions

Veit v. Frater, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22220 (7th Cir. Oct. 31, 2017):   ORDER Jackson Veit sued Angela Frater and "New Company" asserting that they conspired to defraud him of the value of securities that he held in InfoCorp, LLC. A magistrate judge, presiding by consent, see 28 U.S.C. § ...
Veit v. Frater, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22220 (7th Cir. Oct. 31, 2017):   ORDER Jackson Veit sued Angela Frater and "New Company" asserting that they conspired to defraud him of the value of securities that he held in InfoCorp, LLC.…
Continue Reading
Previous108109110111112113114Next

Recent Posts

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

There Is No Good-Faith Defense For Issuing An Overly Burdensome Subpoena

Purposes of Rule 37 and Section 1927 Sanctions

While Rule 11 Doesn’t Apply to Appellate Proceedings (Unless It Has Been Incorporated in Local Appellate Rules), Rule 11 Caselaw Is Looked to for Guidance in Interpreting Applicable Sanctions Powers on Appeal

Rule 11 Sanctions & Appellate Review: Abuse of Discretion Standard Applies Unless Sanctions Are Based Solely (Not Just in Part) on Legal Issues, in Which Case Review Is De Novo

Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions for Altering Expert’s 26(a)(2)(B) Report — Without the Expert’s Knowledge or Approval — by Converting It from PDF to Word, Changing Headings and Other Formatting, and Omitting a Page of Relevant Text and Appendices, Even Though Expert Testified That The Overall Substance of the Report Was Unchanged — Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions May Be Reversed If Failure to Comply with Discovery Order Was Due to Misunderstanding or Inability to Comply

Spoliation: Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) Imposes a Higher Standard — Intent — Than Fourth Circuit Law Previously Applied to Spoliation of Electronically-Stored Information (And Still Does As to Non-ESI) — Willfulness vs. Intent

Inherent Power and § 1927 Sanctions: Removal of counsel from case, referral for disciplinary action, and award of fees and costs for assaulting opposing counsel at deposition — Failure to request hearing waive any right to a hearing — Notice and opportunity to be heard required before sua sponte sanctions imposed, whether under Rule 11, the inherent power of the court or § 1927 — Notice may come from court or opposing counsel — Order imposing sanctions cannot provide notice of sanctions — Nature of bad faith requirement for inherent power sanctions: bad faith to obstruct the judicial process or bring about violation of a court order — Sanctions proceeding need not defer (Younger abstention) to disciplinary proceeding involving the same conduct — Sanctions proceeding doesn’t threaten to interfere with disciplinary proceeding — Why District Court is accorded significant deference in matters concerning attorney’s fees

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice