New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Rule 37(c)(1) Sanctions: Failure to Disclose Witness Bars Use of Declaration on SJ—Alternatively, Must Document Where Wit.’s Name Came Up in Discovery—Abuse of Discretion Standard (7th Cir.)—Exclusion OK Where No Alternative Proposed

King v. Ford Motor Co., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19013 (7th Cir. Oct. 2, 2017): LaWanda King worked for many years as an assembler in Ford Motor Company's vehicle assembly plants. After transferring to its Chicago plant in 2010, though, she claims that she was sexually harassed by a supervisor, after which she began getting reassigned ...
King v. Ford Motor Co., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19013 (7th Cir. Oct. 2, 2017): LaWanda King worked for many years as an assembler in Ford Motor Company's vehicle assembly plants. After transferring to its Chicago plant in 2010, though,…
Continue Reading

RICO: Innocuous Wire Transactions Used to Build Trust = Wire Fraud — Intrabank Transfer May Be Bookkeeping Entry, Not Sufficiently Plead —Analysis in Unappealed Order Granting Prior Dismissal Disregarded — Denial of Leave to Amend Strictly Reviewed

Bui v. Ton Phi, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20304 (9th Cir. Oct. 17, 2017): Mai Ngoc Bui appeals the district court's grant of Defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations [*2]  (RICO) claim from her Second Amended Complaint (SAC). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Bui v. Ton Phi, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20304 (9th Cir. Oct. 17, 2017): Mai Ngoc Bui appeals the district court's grant of Defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations [*2]  (RICO) claim from her…
Continue Reading

Experts: CEO Opinion Based on CEO Experience=701 But If Tech’l Knowl. Used = 702 — 37(c)(1) Sanction for No Expert Rep’t: 4 Factors — Still Prejudiced If You Know the Unreported Opinion — Waiver by Not Defending All Claims Attacked

Dynamic Concepts, Inc. v. Tri-State Surgical Supply & Equipment Ltd., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22348 (2d Cir. Nov. 8, 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgments and orders of the District Court are AFFI ...
Dynamic Concepts, Inc. v. Tri-State Surgical Supply & Equipment Ltd., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22348 (2d Cir. Nov. 8, 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgments and orders of the…
Continue Reading

FRAP 12.1 Allows Limited Remand So That District Court Can Implement Prior Indicative Ruling — Actual Prior Indicative Ruling under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1 Unnecessary If District Court’s Views Clear

Mendia v. Garcia, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22102 (9th Cir. Nov. 3, 2017):     Bernardo Mendia, a naturalized U.S. citizen, was detained in county jail when Immigration and Customs [*3]  Enforcement ("ICE") agents John Garcia and Ching Chang lodged an immigration detainer placing a federal hold to pick him up ...
Mendia v. Garcia, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22102 (9th Cir. Nov. 3, 2017):     Bernardo Mendia, a naturalized U.S. citizen, was detained in county jail when Immigration and Customs [*3]  Enforcement ("ICE") agents John Garcia and Ching Chang lodged an immigration…
Continue Reading

12(b)(6) Motions: SEC Filings and News Articles Judicially Noticeable to Show What Was Available to the Market (Securities Action), Not for Truth — Are Forms 4 Noticeable Absent Allegations of Stock Sales? Case Law Split

Shenwick v. Twitter, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170901 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2017): Twitter is a social media company that, like other social media companies, depends on advertising revenue. Accordingly, how many users T ...
Shenwick v. Twitter, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170901 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2017): Twitter is a social media company that, like other social media companies, depends on advertising revenue. Accordingly, how many users Twitter has, and whether those…
Continue Reading

RICO: Causal Chain Too Attenuated for Third Party Payors to Sue for Improper Off-Label Uses — Need to Attach Expert Report (Here, Regression Analysis) to Complaint to Save It If Nothing Comparable Exists In Published Literature

Sidney Hillman Health Ctr. of Rochester v. Abbott Labs., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19925 (7th Cir. Oct. 12, 2017): The Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of Depakote (divalproex [*2]  sodium) to treat seizures, migraine headaches, and some conditions associated with bipolar disorder. Physicians are free to ...
Sidney Hillman Health Ctr. of Rochester v. Abbott Labs., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19925 (7th Cir. Oct. 12, 2017): The Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of Depakote (divalproex [*2]  sodium) to treat seizures, migraine headaches, and some…
Continue Reading

Electronic Spoliation — Third Circuit Definition (Unaffected by 37(e)) — Deletion of Email Account in Ordinary Course Long Before Litigation Threatened ≠ Spoliation

Archer v. York City School Dist., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18636 (3d Cir. Sept. 27, 2017): *   This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and, pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7, does not constitute binding precedent. This case arises from the decision of the Board of Directors ("the Board") for t ...
Archer v. York City School Dist., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18636 (3d Cir. Sept. 27, 2017): *   This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and, pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7, does not constitute binding precedent. This case arises…
Continue Reading

Good Quotes on Evidence: Experts/Daubert, Rule 403, Credibility, Hearsay — Also Sufficiency of Objections to Preserve Error — All Summarized Up Front

These are good quotes from the following case (highlighted in the text of the case, below): Lang never raised the *** objection specifically***. The district court was not obligated to do Lang's work for her.  Counsel does not preserve an objection simply by making a vague, global objection that ev ...
These are good quotes from the following case (highlighted in the text of the case, below): Lang never raised the *** objection specifically***. The district court was not obligated to do Lang's work for her.  Counsel does not preserve an …
Continue Reading

Rule 37(c)(1) Sanctions: If Exclusion = Dismissal, Must Consider Lesser Sanctions — 37(b) + 37(c)(1) Factors — Meaning of Abuse of Discretion (10th Cir.); Court Must Explain Decision—If Fees Awarded after Appeal Noticed, Must Notice Again or Amend

HCG Platinum, LLC v. Preferred Prod. Placement Corp., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20229 (10th Cir. Oct. 17, 2017): HCG Platinum, LLC ("HCG") and Preferred Product Placement Corporation ("PPPC") entered into a Manufacturer's Representative Agreement ("Marketing Agreement"), under which PPPC agreed to plac ...
HCG Platinum, LLC v. Preferred Prod. Placement Corp., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20229 (10th Cir. Oct. 17, 2017): HCG Platinum, LLC ("HCG") and Preferred Product Placement Corporation ("PPPC") entered into a Manufacturer's Representative Agreement ("Marketing Agreement"), under which PPPC agreed…
Continue Reading

Evidence: That Testimony Is Self-Serving Is No Reason to Exclude It — Production of Emails by Adversary Authenticates Them for for Summary Judgment — A Declaration Stating How Doc Will Be Authenticated for Trial Sufficent on SJ

Johnson v. Cameron Int’l Corp., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135794 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2017): Pending before the court are (1) plaintiff Cameron International Corporation's ("Cameron") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14), and (2) Cameron's objections to plaintiff Willie Johnson's summary judgment evidence (Dkt. 17) ...
Johnson v. Cameron Int’l Corp., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135794 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2017): Pending before the court are (1) plaintiff Cameron International Corporation's ("Cameron") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14), and (2) Cameron's objections to plaintiff Willie Johnson's…
Continue Reading
Previous111112113114115116117Next

Recent Posts

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

There Is No Good-Faith Defense For Issuing An Overly Burdensome Subpoena

Purposes of Rule 37 and Section 1927 Sanctions

While Rule 11 Doesn’t Apply to Appellate Proceedings (Unless It Has Been Incorporated in Local Appellate Rules), Rule 11 Caselaw Is Looked to for Guidance in Interpreting Applicable Sanctions Powers on Appeal

Rule 11 Sanctions & Appellate Review: Abuse of Discretion Standard Applies Unless Sanctions Are Based Solely (Not Just in Part) on Legal Issues, in Which Case Review Is De Novo

Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions for Altering Expert’s 26(a)(2)(B) Report — Without the Expert’s Knowledge or Approval — by Converting It from PDF to Word, Changing Headings and Other Formatting, and Omitting a Page of Relevant Text and Appendices, Even Though Expert Testified That The Overall Substance of the Report Was Unchanged — Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions May Be Reversed If Failure to Comply with Discovery Order Was Due to Misunderstanding or Inability to Comply

Spoliation: Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) Imposes a Higher Standard — Intent — Than Fourth Circuit Law Previously Applied to Spoliation of Electronically-Stored Information (And Still Does As to Non-ESI) — Willfulness vs. Intent

Inherent Power and § 1927 Sanctions: Removal of counsel from case, referral for disciplinary action, and award of fees and costs for assaulting opposing counsel at deposition — Failure to request hearing waive any right to a hearing — Notice and opportunity to be heard required before sua sponte sanctions imposed, whether under Rule 11, the inherent power of the court or § 1927 — Notice may come from court or opposing counsel — Order imposing sanctions cannot provide notice of sanctions — Nature of bad faith requirement for inherent power sanctions: bad faith to obstruct the judicial process or bring about violation of a court order — Sanctions proceeding need not defer (Younger abstention) to disciplinary proceeding involving the same conduct — Sanctions proceeding doesn’t threaten to interfere with disciplinary proceeding — Why District Court is accorded significant deference in matters concerning attorney’s fees

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice