New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Attorney-Client Privilege & Work Product: Mere Allegations, Bare Assertions Insufficient to Invoke Crime-Fraud Exception — What Is a Prima Facie Showing? — Client’s Current Law Firm May Appeal via Perlman

In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10690 (3d Cir. June 16, 2017): *   This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. This case involves the application of the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client and work-product privileges in the con ...
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10690 (3d Cir. June 16, 2017): *   This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. This case involves the…
Continue Reading

Waiver of Securities Claims Is Invalid (§ 29(a)), But All Other Claims Are Gone, Including RICO — Moving to Amend within Statute of Repose Makes Claim Timely — Denial of Leave to Amend Requires Prejudice or Bad Faith (Factors), Not Mere Delay

Pasternack v. Schrader, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12513 (2d Cir. July 13, 2017): The plaintiffs are retired officers of Booz Allen Hamilton, a privately-held corporation. Bruce Pasternack, Reginald Boudinot, and Paul Kocourek allege that they were improperly denied compensation when, after their retirement, Booz Allen Hamilton sold ...
Pasternack v. Schrader, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12513 (2d Cir. July 13, 2017): The plaintiffs are retired officers of Booz Allen Hamilton, a privately-held corporation. Bruce Pasternack, Reginald Boudinot, and Paul Kocourek allege that they were improperly denied compensation when, …
Continue Reading

Facebook Admissibility: Third-Party Facebook Posts Admitted for Non-Hearsay Purpose of Showing Peer-to-Peer Harassment of Plaintiff under Title IX

T.B. v. New Kensington-Arnold Sch. Dist., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103275 (W.D. Pa. July 5, 2017): AND NOW, this 5th day of July, 2017, the following came before the court for consideration: (1) Plaintiff's motion in limine to recognize witnesses as adverse and examine as if on cross examination [ECF ...
T.B. v. New Kensington-Arnold Sch. Dist., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103275 (W.D. Pa. July 5, 2017): AND NOW, this 5th day of July, 2017, the following came before the court for consideration: (1) Plaintiff's motion in limine to recognize witnesses…
Continue Reading

Contrary to 6th Circuit (see our 7/12/17 post), New York Court of Appeals Seems to Require That Authentication of Any Photo on Social Media Requires Authentication of Page or ID of Owner — But the Case Was Argued That Way

People v Price, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1694 (N.Y. Ct. App. June 27, 2017): On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the People proffered a sufficient foundation at trial to authenticate a photograph -- purportedly of defendant holding a firearm and money -- that was obtained from an internet profile page allegedly belonging to defen ...
People v Price, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1694 (N.Y. Ct. App. June 27, 2017): On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the People proffered a sufficient foundation at trial to authenticate a photograph — purportedly of defendant holding a…
Continue Reading

Sanctions—Appellate Review: “Deference Should Not Be Confused with Total Capitulation”—Rule 11 Does “Not Require Perfect Research or Utter Prescience” (Good Quotes) — Client Can’t Be Sanctioned for Flawed Legal Arguments

Eldridge v. Gordon Bros. Grp., LLC, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12577 (1st Cir. July 13, 2017): PREFACE Today's case involves a moderately complex business dispute, rich with issues. On one side is plaintiff K's Merchandise Mart, Inc., which we call "Old K's" (for reasons that will soon become cl ...
Eldridge v. Gordon Bros. Grp., LLC, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12577 (1st Cir. July 13, 2017): PREFACE Today's case involves a moderately complex business dispute, rich with issues. On one side is plaintiff K's Merchandise Mart, Inc., which we call…
Continue Reading

Social Media Authentication: Twitter Estimates That at Least 27 Million Twitter Accounts Are Fake, And That May Be Low

Tim Wu, Please Prove You're Not a Robot, New York Times, July 16, 2017, Sunday Review Section at 8: "Twitter estimates at least 27 million probably fake accounts; researchers suggest the realnumber is closer to 48 million." And an important point about Internet reviews: "Give ...
Tim Wu, Please Prove You're Not a Robot, New York Times, July 16, 2017, Sunday Review Section at 8: "Twitter estimates at least 27 million probably fake accounts; researchers suggest the realnumber is closer to 48 million." And an important…
Continue Reading

Spoliation — Intentional Destruction of Evidence Indicating a Desire to Suppress the Truth Still Required for Spoliation of Tangible Evidence in 8th Circuit Post-37(e)

Davis v. White, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10273 (8th Cir. June 9, 2017): Henry M. Davis sued the City of Ferguson and three police officers, alleging they beat him while he was handcuffed. See Davis v. White, 794 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2015). His claims [*2]  were tried to a jury after the district court2 denied his B ...
Davis v. White, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10273 (8th Cir. June 9, 2017): Henry M. Davis sued the City of Ferguson and three police officers, alleging they beat him while he was handcuffed. See Davis v. White, 794 F.3d 1008…
Continue Reading

Supreme Court: Intervenor of Right under Rule 24(a)(2) Must Have Article III Standing to Pursue Relief Different from That Sought by a Party with Standing

Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc., 198 L. Ed. 2d 64 (U.S. June 5, 2017): Must a litigant possess Article III standing in order to intervene of right under Federal Rule of Civil Pro ...
Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc., 198 L. Ed. 2d 64 (U.S. June 5, 2017): Must a litigant possess Article III standing in order to intervene of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2)? The parties do …
Continue Reading

Despite Cunningham, Sanction of Striking FSIA Defense (to Litigating at All) Is Immediately Appealable — It Is Also Beyond the Court’s Power — But Lesser Sanctions That Produce the Same Result Are OK

Funk v. Belneftekhim, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11587 (2d Cir. June 29, 2017): In this action, originally filed in New York State court, plaintiffs Emanuel Zeltser and Vladlena Funk sue defendants Concern Belneftekhim [*2]  ("BNTK") and Belneftekhim USA, Inc. ("BUSA") for their alleged roles in plaintiffs' ...
Funk v. Belneftekhim, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11587 (2d Cir. June 29, 2017): In this action, originally filed in New York State court, plaintiffs Emanuel Zeltser and Vladlena Funk sue defendants Concern Belneftekhim [*2]  ("BNTK") and Belneftekhim USA, Inc. ("BUSA") …
Continue Reading

Rule 11 Sanctions Motion Not Mooted by Dismissal of All Claims — Review of Refusal to Consider Motion Is De Novo — State and Federal Sanctions Motions Focus on Different Filings

Brice v. Bauer, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8800 (3d Cir. May 19, 2017): Before this Court is Kim Bauer's appeal of the Order of the District Court, which denied her motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 as moot after dismissing or entering judgment in Bauer's favor on all claims brought against her
Brice v. Bauer, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8800 (3d Cir. May 19, 2017): Before this Court is Kim Bauer's appeal of the Order of the District Court, which denied her motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 …
Continue Reading
Previous124125126127128129130Next

Recent Posts

RICO Causation: Parents of Children with Disabilities Deprived In-Person Education and Services during the Pandemic Were Not Causally Injured by Teachers’ False Assurances to Federal Authorities That IDEA-Complaint Policies Were in Place, Which Caused Funds to Issue But Not to the Benefit of the Disabled Children — Damages Too Indirect — Proper Plaintiff Is U.S. Government — Private Injunctive Relief Under RICO Uncertain in Third Circuit

Sanctions: Rule 37(b)(2) Dismissal — Sixth Circuit Factors

Inherent Power Sanctions — Extrajudicial Misconduct: Sanctions Power Extends to Conduct Intended to Sabotage Court’s Ability to Adjudicate the Case Before It, Here, By Commencing State Court Actions Seeking to Enjoin the Federal Plaintiffs from Proceeding with Their Federal Litigation — Sanctions Fee Awards: The Factors Used For Calculating A Fee Award To A Prevailing Party Do Not Govern — Under Goodyear, the Relevant Inquiry Is Whether There Is A Sufficient Causal Link Between The Sanctioned Misconduct And The Fees Awarded

RICO: Members of Association-in-Fact Enterprise Must Act with a Common Purpose—Mere Allegation That Various Defendants Agreed at Different Times to Engage in Various Fraudulent Schemes Does Not Plausibly Support the Essential Inference, That They Acted with s Sufficiently Common Purpose

RICO Causation: (1) State’s Misrepresentation to Federal Government That It Was Providing Plaintiffs with Mandated Special Education Did Not Cause Plaintiffs’ Injury Because The Failure to Provide The Education Was Not Caused by the Fraud on the Federal Government — (2) The Three Factors for Assessing RICO Causation — (3) Limits of the Second Circuit’s Decision in Alix v. McKinsey That Causation Can Be Established Where A Fraud On The Judiciary “Or Other Governmental Entity” Resulted In A Resource Going To Someone Less Deserving

Rule 41(b): Five Factors to Be Weighed in Deciding Whether Dismissal Is Appropriate (Second Circuit) — Is A Finding of Bad Faith or Fault Required if Dismissal Is Without Prejudice? — Undecided If Truly Without Prejudice But It Is Required If the Without Prejudice Dismissal Will Act as a Dismissal on the Merits (Here, Because of the Statute of Limitations) — Failure To Consider A Lesser Sanction Than Dismissal Is Generally An Abuse Of Discretion

Spoliation Sanctions/Mootness: Stipulation Resolving “All Pending Discovery Disputes,” Which Are Enumerated, Does Not Moot Subsequent Sanctions Motion for ESI Spoliation — Postjudgment Sanctions Order Is Appealable When District Court Has Finally Disposed of Both Liability and Amount

Rule 37 Default Judgment Sanction: (1) Default Judgment Appropriate Only As a Last Resort, When Less Drastic Sanctions Would Not Ensure Compliance with the Court’s Orders — (2) Default Judgment Sanction Requires Willful or Bad Faith Failure to Obey Discovery Order — (3) Fugitive Defendant’s Failure to Appear at Court-Ordered, Remote Deposition Despite Court Warning That Sanctions Could Follow Disobedience Warrants Default Judgment — (4) District Court Afforded Wide Discretion in Interpreting Its Own Orders — (5) Filing a Notice of Appeal from a Non-Appealable Order (Here, a Discovery Order) Does Not Deprive the District Court of Jurisdiction over the Case

RICO and Injunctions: (1) State Court Actions Designed to Perpetuate and Monetize a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable under RICO, Even Though They Are Not Themselves Alleged to Be Predicate Acts [Note: Noerr Pennington Applies in RICO Actions] — (2) Although Civil RICO’s Text and Legislative History Fail to Reveal Any Intent to Override the Provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act, Arbitrations Are Enjoinable Under the “Effective Vindication” Doctrine Where They Operate As a Prospective Waiver of a Party’s Right to Pursue Statutory RICO Remedies — (3) Arbitration Findings May Be Given Collateral Estoppel Effect in a Civil RICO Action — (4) Injunction of Non-Corrupt State Court Litigations That Furthers a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable Under the Anti-Injunction Act’s “Expressly Authorized” Exception — (5) “The Irreparable Harm Requirement Is The Single Most Important Prerequisite For The Issuance Of A Preliminary Injunction” (Good Quote) — (6) When Injunction Is Based on “Serious Questions on the Merits” Rather Than “Likelihood of Success,” Court May Rely on Unverified Pleadings and Attached Exhibits to Assess the Merits, Unless the Opponent Has Raised Substantial Questions (Here, the Opponent Failed to Request an Evidentiary Hearing) — (7) Whether Amended Pleading Moots An Appeal Turns on Whether It Materially Changes the Substantive Basis for the Appeal — (8) Meaning of “In That” (“Used To Introduce A Statement That Explains Or Gives More Specific Information” About A Prior Statement)

RICO: Fraudulent Concealment Must Prevent Discovery of the Injury to Toll Statute of Limitations

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice