New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Email [Text] Evidence: Request or Proposal ≠ Hearsay Because It Doesn’t Assert the Truth of Any Fact — Photo of Email Must Be Authenticated As Photo (Fair & Accurate) and Writing (Circumstantial Evid., Including Contents)

People v. Dodge, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 8503, 2017 WL 6350073 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 13, 2017): A jury convicted defendant Aaron Dodge of several drug offenses and acquitted him of several others. The jury found him guilty of possession for sale of LSD (
People v. Dodge, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 8503, 2017 WL 6350073 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 13, 2017): A jury convicted defendant Aaron Dodge of several drug offenses and acquitted him of several others. The jury found him guilty of…
Continue Reading

3d Circuit’s 7-Factor Test for Admitting Tape Recordings in Criminal Cases Is Not The Sole Test — Tape Recordings of Voicemails Admitted on Testimony of Recipient/Taper — Gaps in Chain of Custody Go to Weight

United States v. Credico, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25472 (3d Cir. Dec. 18, 2017) (affirming the decision excerpted in our post of Nov. 19, 2016): Defendant Justin Credico appeals from his conviction after a jury trial for threatening federal agents and their immediate family members, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1).
United States v. Credico, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25472 (3d Cir. Dec. 18, 2017) (affirming the decision excerpted in our post of Nov. 19, 2016): Defendant Justin Credico appeals from his conviction after a jury trial for threatening federal agents…
Continue Reading

Spoliation: Bad Faith Needed in 10th Cir. But Breach of Reg Gives Rise to Bursting Bubble Presumption (R. 301) Against Destroyer—Opening Statement Opens Door to Evid on Matters Mentioned, Waives In Limine Motion, Which Must Be Renewed at Trial (R. 103)

EEOC v. JetStream Ground Servs., Inc., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 26867 (10th Cir. Dec. 28, 2017): A jury rejected an employment-discrimination claim against JetStream Ground Services, Inc. filed by several Muslim women and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (collectively, Plaintiffs1
EEOC v. JetStream Ground Servs., Inc., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 26867 (10th Cir. Dec. 28, 2017): A jury rejected an employment-discrimination claim against JetStream Ground Services, Inc. filed by several Muslim women and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (collectively, …
Continue Reading

RICO Conspiracy Requires Agreement to Facilitate Scheme That Includes Operation or Management of RICO Enterprise (9th Circuit)

United States v. Young, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 26858 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 2017): *   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. On August 2, 2009, alleged Pueblo Bishops Bloods gang member Jesse McWayne was killed during a drive-by shooting in the Puebl ...
United States v. Young, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 26858 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 2017): *   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. On August 2, 2009, alleged Pueblo…
Continue Reading

Rule 16(f) Sanctions: Failure to Notify Adversary of Change in Settlement Posture Before Settlement Conference = Not Participating in Good Faith — Appeals: Failure to Include Transcript Bars Review of Findings of Fact Concerning Hearing

Koehn v. Tobias, 2017 WL 3327009 (7th Cir. Aug. 4, 2017): Plaintiff-appellee Peter Koehn filed suit under
Koehn v. Tobias, 2017 WL 3327009 (7th Cir. Aug. 4, 2017): Plaintiff-appellee Peter Koehn filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants-appellants Lauri Tobias and Margaret Segerston (Defendants), his former employers, unlawfully retaliated against him for exercising…
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions on Non-Party OK (Purported CEO of Plaintiffs, Authored Bad Faith Affidavits, Failed to Appear when Ordered) — 9th Circuit’s Recklessness-Plus Standard for Bad Faith: Concrete Examples

Indiezone, Inc. v. Rooke, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25308 (9th Cir. Dec. 14, 2017): MEMORANDUM* *   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. In this consolidated appeal, appellants seek review of the district ...
Indiezone, Inc. v. Rooke, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25308 (9th Cir. Dec. 14, 2017): MEMORANDUM* *   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. In this consolidated appeal, appellants…
Continue Reading

Sanctions: Sixth Circuit Applies Same Four Factors to Determine Whether Dismissal Is Warranted under Rules 37(b)(2) and 41(b)

Marsh v. Rhodes, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25354 (6th Cir. Dec. 14, 2017): ORDER DeVonne Marsh, a former Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 and 41. Additionally, he moves to sanction the defendants. This case ha ...
Marsh v. Rhodes, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25354 (6th Cir. Dec. 14, 2017): ORDER DeVonne Marsh, a former Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under Federal Rules of Civil…
Continue Reading

Spoliation — In Criminal Cases, Bad Faith Is Essential to Support Adverse Inference Instruction Even in Circuits Not Requiring Bad Faith in Civil Cases (Dissent Questions Whether This Is True in All Cirs. — This Case Makes It True in 6th Cir.)

United States v. Brasswell, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16144 (6th Cir. Aug. 21, 2017): Defendant Larry Braswell was convicted of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and was sentenced to 235 months' imprisonment. On appeal, Defendant challenges both his conviction and his sentenc ...
United States v. Brasswell, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16144 (6th Cir. Aug. 21, 2017): Defendant Larry Braswell was convicted of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and was…
Continue Reading

Texts from Unknown Phone Authenticated by Testimony That Recipient Called Number and Recognized the Voice of the Sender

People v. Mansoori, 2017 IL App (1st) 151832, 2017 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2510 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2017):  [*P1]  Held: The defendant's conviction for harassment through electronic communications is affirmed.  [*P2]  The pro se defendant-appellant
People v. Mansoori, 2017 IL App (1st) 151832, 2017 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2510 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2017):  [*P1]  Held: The defendant's conviction for harassment through electronic communications is affirmed.  [*P2]  The pro se defendant-appellant1 Christopher Mansoori,…
Continue Reading

Disqualification: 10th Cir. Factors—Essential Issue Is Taint of Lawsuit — Sanctions: If Attorney’s Fees Imposed on Client & Counsel, Counsel’s Objecting Just for Itself = Conflict, Resolved by Agreeing to Pay All—Meaning of Abuse of Discretion

U.S. ex rel. Tracy v. Emigration Improvement Dist., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 23650 (10th Cir. Nov. 22, 2017):   *   After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties' request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See < ...
U.S. ex rel. Tracy v. Emigration Improvement Dist., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 23650 (10th Cir. Nov. 22, 2017):   *   After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties' request for a decision on…
Continue Reading
Previous107108109110111112113Next

Recent Posts

RICO Causation: Parents of Children with Disabilities Deprived In-Person Education and Services during the Pandemic Were Not Causally Injured by Teachers’ False Assurances to Federal Authorities That IDEA-Complaint Policies Were in Place, Which Caused Funds to Issue But Not to the Benefit of the Disabled Children — Damages Too Indirect — Proper Plaintiff Is U.S. Government — Private Injunctive Relief Under RICO Uncertain in Third Circuit

Sanctions: Rule 37(b)(2) Dismissal — Sixth Circuit Factors

Inherent Power Sanctions — Extrajudicial Misconduct: Sanctions Power Extends to Conduct Intended to Sabotage Court’s Ability to Adjudicate the Case Before It, Here, By Commencing State Court Actions Seeking to Enjoin the Federal Plaintiffs from Proceeding with Their Federal Litigation — Sanctions Fee Awards: The Factors Used For Calculating A Fee Award To A Prevailing Party Do Not Govern — Under Goodyear, the Relevant Inquiry Is Whether There Is A Sufficient Causal Link Between The Sanctioned Misconduct And The Fees Awarded

RICO: Members of Association-in-Fact Enterprise Must Act with a Common Purpose—Mere Allegation That Various Defendants Agreed at Different Times to Engage in Various Fraudulent Schemes Does Not Plausibly Support the Essential Inference, That They Acted with s Sufficiently Common Purpose

RICO Causation: (1) State’s Misrepresentation to Federal Government That It Was Providing Plaintiffs with Mandated Special Education Did Not Cause Plaintiffs’ Injury Because The Failure to Provide The Education Was Not Caused by the Fraud on the Federal Government — (2) The Three Factors for Assessing RICO Causation — (3) Limits of the Second Circuit’s Decision in Alix v. McKinsey That Causation Can Be Established Where A Fraud On The Judiciary “Or Other Governmental Entity” Resulted In A Resource Going To Someone Less Deserving

Rule 41(b): Five Factors to Be Weighed in Deciding Whether Dismissal Is Appropriate (Second Circuit) — Is A Finding of Bad Faith or Fault Required if Dismissal Is Without Prejudice? — Undecided If Truly Without Prejudice But It Is Required If the Without Prejudice Dismissal Will Act as a Dismissal on the Merits (Here, Because of the Statute of Limitations) — Failure To Consider A Lesser Sanction Than Dismissal Is Generally An Abuse Of Discretion

Spoliation Sanctions/Mootness: Stipulation Resolving “All Pending Discovery Disputes,” Which Are Enumerated, Does Not Moot Subsequent Sanctions Motion for ESI Spoliation — Postjudgment Sanctions Order Is Appealable When District Court Has Finally Disposed of Both Liability and Amount

Rule 37 Default Judgment Sanction: (1) Default Judgment Appropriate Only As a Last Resort, When Less Drastic Sanctions Would Not Ensure Compliance with the Court’s Orders — (2) Default Judgment Sanction Requires Willful or Bad Faith Failure to Obey Discovery Order — (3) Fugitive Defendant’s Failure to Appear at Court-Ordered, Remote Deposition Despite Court Warning That Sanctions Could Follow Disobedience Warrants Default Judgment — (4) District Court Afforded Wide Discretion in Interpreting Its Own Orders — (5) Filing a Notice of Appeal from a Non-Appealable Order (Here, a Discovery Order) Does Not Deprive the District Court of Jurisdiction over the Case

RICO and Injunctions: (1) State Court Actions Designed to Perpetuate and Monetize a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable under RICO, Even Though They Are Not Themselves Alleged to Be Predicate Acts [Note: Noerr Pennington Applies in RICO Actions] — (2) Although Civil RICO’s Text and Legislative History Fail to Reveal Any Intent to Override the Provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act, Arbitrations Are Enjoinable Under the “Effective Vindication” Doctrine Where They Operate As a Prospective Waiver of a Party’s Right to Pursue Statutory RICO Remedies — (3) Arbitration Findings May Be Given Collateral Estoppel Effect in a Civil RICO Action — (4) Injunction of Non-Corrupt State Court Litigations That Furthers a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable Under the Anti-Injunction Act’s “Expressly Authorized” Exception — (5) “The Irreparable Harm Requirement Is The Single Most Important Prerequisite For The Issuance Of A Preliminary Injunction” (Good Quote) — (6) When Injunction Is Based on “Serious Questions on the Merits” Rather Than “Likelihood of Success,” Court May Rely on Unverified Pleadings and Attached Exhibits to Assess the Merits, Unless the Opponent Has Raised Substantial Questions (Here, the Opponent Failed to Request an Evidentiary Hearing) — (7) Whether Amended Pleading Moots An Appeal Turns on Whether It Materially Changes the Substantive Basis for the Appeal — (8) Meaning of “In That” (“Used To Introduce A Statement That Explains Or Gives More Specific Information” About A Prior Statement)

RICO: Fraudulent Concealment Must Prevent Discovery of the Injury to Toll Statute of Limitations

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice