New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Joseph Hage Aaronson

Does Rule 15(b)(2) — Amendment of Complaint by Trial of the Issue on Express or Implied Consent — Apply at the Summary Judgment Stage? — Circuit Split

Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. Professional Exteriors, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84868 (D. Minn. June 29, 2016): Plaintiff Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. ("Cedar Valley") brought this action against defendant Professional Exteriors, Inc. ("Professional Exteriors"), alleging that Professional Exteriors infringed…
Continue Reading

RICO: Threat to File Suit against Government, Even If Made in Bad Faith & Supported by False Affidavits, Isn’t “Wrongful” within Hobbs Act — Where Citizen May Request Records Anonymously, Using Fake Identity ≠ Mail Fraud

Town of Gulfstream v. O’Boyle, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11183 (11th Cir. June 21, 2016): The Town of Gulf Stream, Florida ("Gulf Stream" or the "town") and its contractor Wantman Group, Inc. ("Wantman") (collectively the "plaintiffs") appeal the dismissal of…
Continue Reading

Attorney-Client Privilege — Talks with Law Firm GC Privileged — No Current Client Exception — Privilege Intact Even If RPC Violated, Intent to Disclose Exists — Reliance on Privileged Matter Sine Qua Non of At-Issue Waiver (Good Quotes)

Stock v. Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, 2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5082 (1st Dept. June 30, 2016): The primary issue on this appeal is whether attorneys who have sought the advice of their law firm's in-house general counsel …
Continue Reading

Facebook Admissibility: Photos Authenticated by Witness Familiar with Page Owner’s Appearance — Posts by Fact They Emanated from Owner’s User Name and Were Obtained via Search Warrant for His Account

People v. Johnson, 2016 Mich. App. LEXIS 1256 (Mich. Ct. App. June 28, 2016): Defendant, Timothy Noel Johnson, was convicted by a jury of first-degree premeditated murder, MCL 750.316(1)(a), possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (felony …
Continue Reading

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence: Party’s Filings with State, Local Governments — Pending Appeal, District Court Retains Jurisdiction to Modify Injunction But May Not Materially Alter the Status of the Case on Appeal or Change the Core Issues

Nat’l Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. Calif. State Grange, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53038 (E.D. Cal. April 20, 2016): Plaintiff National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry brought this action against defendant California State…
Continue Reading

Facebook Messages Authenticated by Recipient: She and Sender Used a Code Known Only to Them, She Recognized “the Way He Said Things” and the Subject Matter Was Known Only to Them — Recipient’s Messages Received for Context ≠ Hearsay

Bullman v. State, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 3775 (Tex. Ct. App. Apr. 13, 2016): In four issues, appellant, Curtis Nathaniel Bullman, challenges his conviction for continuous sexual abuse of a young child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.02 (West…
Continue Reading

LinkedIn Admissibility: Profile of Employee Is Hearsay as to Employer Concerning Whether She Was a Manager Authorized to Accept Service of Process for Employer — “Proper Service of Process Is Not Some Mindless Technicality” (Good Quote)

Genesis Diamonds, LLC v. John Hardy, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83165 (M.D. Tenn. June 27, 2016): Before the court are multiple motions: (1) defendant John Hardy, Inc.'s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 8); (2) a …
Continue Reading
Previous163164165166167168169Next

Recent Articles

The Word “Include” May Be A Word of Limitation As Opposed to a Word of Enlargement, Depending on the Context

RICO — Pleading Conspiracy — Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Allege That the Defendants Knowingly Joined the RICO Conspiracy — Sparse Allegations of Knowledge of Fraud Due to Participation in a Commercial Transaction Insufficient to State RICO Conspiracy Claim Where Allegations Not Inconsistent with Ordinary Commercial Behavior — While Knowledge May Be Pled “Generally” under Rule 9(b), It Cannot Be Alleged Conclusorily and Must Satisfy the Twiqbal Plausibility Standard

Depositions: Improper to Object to Form to Straightforward Questions (Not Compound, Vague, Leading or Speculative) — Lack of Foundation Objection Improper in 30(b)(6) Deposition — Improper to “Educate” Witness During Breaks of 30(b)(6) Deposition Through Witness Calls to Knowledgeable Corporate Colleagues — Magistrate Judge May Impose Financial Sanctions

Spoliation/Sanctions: “A Party Does Not Spoliate Evidence When, Without Notice Of The Evidence’s Potential Relevance, It Destroys The Evidence According To Its Policy Or In The Normal Course Of Its Business” (Good Quote)

RICO: Fraud on Government Entities Causing Plaintiffs to Pay More for Inmate Calls Actionable on Bridge v. Phoenix Bond Analysis — Fact That Governments Had Separate Injuries As Part of the Scheme (from Reduced Commissions) Irrelevant — Plaintiffs’ Injuries Not Derivative of Governments’ — The Fraud on the Governments Was Not Too Distinct From Plaintiffs’ Injuries But Rather Necessary to Injure Plaintiffs — No Risk of Duplicative Recoveries and No Plaintiff Better Situated to Sue for Plaintiffs’ Injuries

Inherent Power Sanctions — Dismissal for Threatening Defendant and Magistrate Judge — No First Amendment Right to Threaten Violence

RICO: Domestic Injury — Delivery of Fraudulently Non-Conforming Goods FOB Los Angeles for Shipment to China Means Injury Arose Domestically When Purchaser Took Title —Other Relevant Factors Include That The Non-Conforming Goods Were Sourced and Made in the U.S. and The Racketeering Activity (Mail/Wire Fraud) Occurred in, and Was Directed from, the United States — Irrelevant to Domestic Injury Inquiry Whether Property Is Tangible or Intangible — 7th Circuit’s “Injury-Felt” Test of Domestic Injury Rejected by Supreme Court — RICO Standing Requires Concrete Financial Loss, Not Merely Injury to Valuable Intangible Property Interest (9th Circuit)

RICO Causation: Parents of Children with Disabilities Deprived In-Person Education and Services during the Pandemic Were Not Causally Injured by Teachers’ False Assurances to Federal Authorities That IDEA-Complaint Policies Were in Place, Which Caused Funds to Issue But Not to the Benefit of the Disabled Children — Damages Too Indirect — Proper Plaintiff Is U.S. Government — Private Injunctive Relief Under RICO Uncertain in Third Circuit

Sanctions: Rule 37(b)(2) Dismissal — Sixth Circuit Factors

Inherent Power Sanctions — Extrajudicial Misconduct: Sanctions Power Extends to Conduct Intended to Sabotage Court’s Ability to Adjudicate the Case Before It, Here, By Commencing State Court Actions Seeking to Enjoin the Federal Plaintiffs from Proceeding with Their Federal Litigation — Sanctions Fee Awards: The Factors Used For Calculating A Fee Award To A Prevailing Party Do Not Govern — Under Goodyear, the Relevant Inquiry Is Whether There Is A Sufficient Causal Link Between The Sanctioned Misconduct And The Fees Awarded

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice