Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

June 28, 2011

From Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4567 (June 20, 2011): The crux of this case is commonality — the rule requiring a plaintiff to show that "there are questions of law or fact common to the class." Rule 23(a)(2). Footnote 5. We have previously stated in this context that "[t]he commonality ...
From Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4567 (June 20, 2011): The crux of this case is commonality — the rule requiring a plaintiff to show that “there are questions of law or fact common to the class.”…

Recent Articles

Archives