"One of 10

Best Lawyers

in New York"

-New York Super Lawyers 2020™

“Joseph’s New York firm has a definable ‘sweet spot’; big-dollar complex financial transactions involving the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and securities claims, credit default swaps and derivatives—a veritable chocolate box of the financial cases of the past decade.” –National Law Journal

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Practices

JHA guides and supports clients by integrating effective case strategy with seamless delivery. The disputes JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

View Our Practices

Attorneys

Pamela Jarvis

Ethics Counsel

Samuel N. Fraidin

Counsel

Hon. Robert E. Gerber

Of Counsel (USBJ Retired)

Sandra M. Lipsman

Partner

Peter R. Jerdee

Partner

Gregory P. Joseph

Partner

Mara Leventhal

Partner

Honey L. Kober

Of Counsel

Benjamin H. Albert

Associate

Courtney A. Solomon

Partner

Roman Asudulayev

Associate

Gila S. Singer

Associate

Christopher J. Stanley

Partner

Benjamin A. Taylor

Associate

Rachel M. Cherington

Partner

Meet all of our attorneys

Latest from our complex lit blog

 

Rule 37(c)(1) Sanctions — Exclusion of Critical Evidence Generally Requires Willful Deception or Flagrant Disregard of Court Order — Disclosure of Undisclosed Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(i) During Discovery Precludes Claim of Surprise or Prejudice (and Satisfies Rule 26(e)(1)(A))

Read more
 

Inherent Power Sanctions — Notice of Contemplated Sanctions against Client (in Motion and Show Cause Order) Did Not Provide Notice of Potential Sanctions against Counsel — Finding of Bad Faith Required for Inherent Power Sanctions

Read more
 

Spoliation Sanctions: (1) Meaning of “Relevance” for Preservation vs. for Adverse Inference Purposes; (2) Only “Very Slight Showing” of Latter Required; (3) Adverse Inference Instruction OK for Negligent Spoliation of Tangible Evidence in D.C. Cir.; (4) Preponderance of Evidence for Adverse Inference Instruction vs. Clear & Convincing for Attorney’s Fees; (5) Wide Range of Inherent Power Sanctions Available; (6) Two Sets of Factors for Adverse Inference Instruction (D.C. Cir.) — Prerequisites and Propriety in the Circumstances; (7) Ordinary vs. Gross Negligence; (8) Cite

Read more
View Our Complex Lit Blog