"One of 10

Best Lawyers

in New York"

-New York Super Lawyers 2020™

“Joseph’s New York firm has a definable ‘sweet spot’; big-dollar complex financial transactions involving the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and securities claims, credit default swaps and derivatives—a veritable chocolate box of the financial cases of the past decade.” –National Law Journal

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Practices

JHA guides and supports clients by integrating effective case strategy with seamless delivery. The disputes JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

View Our Practices

Attorneys

Sandra M. Lipsman

Partner

Benjamin H. Albert

Partner

Benjamin A. Taylor

Associate

Gregory P. Joseph

Partner

Samuel N. Fraidin

Counsel

Hon. Robert E. Gerber

Of Counsel (USBJ Retired)

Roman Asudulayev

Associate

Courtney A. Solomon

Partner

Peter R. Jerdee

Partner

Rachel M. Cherington

Partner

Mara Leventhal

Partner

Gila S. Singer

Associate

Honey L. Kober

Of Counsel

Christopher J. Stanley

Partner

Meet all of our attorneys

Latest from our complex lit blog

 

First Impression — Removal — Appellate Jurisdiction to Review Remand Orders: Notwithstanding 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), Court of Appeals Has Jurisdiction to Review Remand Order Citing §1447(e) Where That Statute Is Not Actually The Basis of The Order But Prudential Considerations (Abstention) Are— § 1447(e) Cannot Serve As A Basis To Remand If The Plaintiff Is Not Seeking To Add A Party Whose Joinder Would Destroy Subject-Matter Jurisdiction

Read more
 

Discovery Violations Should Ordinarily Be Punished Under Rules 26(g) And 37, Not Inherent Power — Sanctions Should Be Tailored Because Violations Occur Along A Continuum of Fault — Three-Factor Test to Determine Whether Sanctions For Non-Production Are Apt (Second Circuit) — Producing Some Relevant Documents Is No Excuse For Not Producing All/Producing Drafts Does Not Excuse Nonproduction of Finals (Good Quote) — There Is No Carve-Out From The Duty To Produce For Publicly-Filed Information (Good Quote) — Duty To Produce Includes Subsequently-Created Documents (Documents Created After Discovery Response) — Factors In Choosing The Appropriate Sanction — Purposes Of Discovery Sanctions — Proportionality: Need for Sanction to Be Tailored to Remedy the Prejudice Suffered

Read more
 

Matter of First Impression vs. Baseless Position (Good Quote)

Read more
View Our Complex Lit Blog