New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

SLUSA: Must Misrepresentation Be an Element of the State Law Claim to Trigger SLUSA? — Multi-Way Circuit Split (See Dissenting Opinion)

Northstar Fin. Advisors v. Schwab Invs., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 26095 (9th Cir. Sept. 14, 2018): In this appeal, we consider whether the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (" ...
Northstar Fin. Advisors v. Schwab Invs., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 26095 (9th Cir. Sept. 14, 2018): In this appeal, we consider whether the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act ("SLUSA") precludes class claims brought under state law by Northstar Financial…
Continue Reading

Experts: “Daubert Is Meant to Protect Juries” — In Bench Trial, “Gatekeeper Is Keeping Gate Only for Himself” (Good Quotes) — No Need for Pretrial Hearing, Can Exclude Post-Trial — Fingerprint Analysis Generally Accepted

United States v. Flores, 901 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. Aug. 28, 2018): Edwin Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals his conviction for attempting to reenter the United States after b ...
United States v. Flores, 901 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. Aug. 28, 2018): Edwin Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals his conviction for attempting to reenter the United States after being deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. §…
Continue Reading

Absent Amendment, Allegation in Complaint = Binding Judicial Admission and Cannot Be Controverted on Appeal

Haynes v. Ind. Univ., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 25022 (7th Cir. Sept. 4, 2018): Ray Haynes was employed as an assistant professor in the Department of Education at Indiana University. At the ...
Haynes v. Ind. Univ., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 25022 (7th Cir. Sept. 4, 2018): Ray Haynes was employed as an assistant professor in the Department of Education at Indiana University. At the end of his six-year probationary contract, he…
Continue Reading

Unconscionability of Arbitration Clause Determine by State Law — Unilateral Right to Choose Arbitration Provider Is Substantively Unconscionable, But Prevailing Party Fees and Choice of Forum Are Not

Beltran v. AuPairCare, Inc., 2018 WL 5571319 (10th Cir. Oct. 30, 2018): *1 Au pairs and former au pairs filed a class action lawsuit against AuPairCare, Inc. (“APC”) and other au pair sponsoring companies in federal district court alleging violations of antitrust laws, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiz ...
Beltran v. AuPairCare, Inc., 2018 WL 5571319 (10th Cir. Oct. 30, 2018): *1 Au pairs and former au pairs filed a class action lawsuit against AuPairCare, Inc. (“APC”) and other au pair sponsoring companies in federal district court alleging violations…
Continue Reading

Rule 37(e) Electronic Spoliation: If Court Accepts Plaintiff’s Version of Missing Emails But Finds Def/Spoliator Still Entitled to Summary Judgment, No Further Sanction Required — Intent to Destroy Not Found by Court (Jury Issue? Relev.?)

Barbera v. Pearson Educ., Inc., 2018 WL 4939772 (7th Cir. Oct. 12, 2018): *1 Vicki Barbera claims she did not get the same chance to resign with severance pay that three men got. She sued her former employer, Pearson Education, Inc. (“Pearson”) for Title VII sex discrimination and other claims. She also sa ...
Barbera v. Pearson Educ., Inc., 2018 WL 4939772 (7th Cir. Oct. 12, 2018): *1 Vicki Barbera claims she did not get the same chance to resign with severance pay that three men got. She sued her former employer, Pearson Education,…
Continue Reading

Yelp Reviews = Hearsay — Evidence: Generally, There Is No Prejudice If Objection Is Sustained — Court of Appeals Assumes Trial Court’s Admonition to Jury to Disregard Is Followed (Good Quotes)

People v. Suwannangkul, 2018 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7316 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2018): I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Anucha Suwannangkul appeals from a judgment of ...
People v. Suwannangkul, 2018 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7316 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2018): I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Anucha Suwannangkul appeals from a judgment of conviction following a jury trial. The jury found defendant guilty of two counts of…
Continue Reading

Must a Court Consider Only Admissible Evidence on Class Certification? — Circuit Split — Ninth Circuit Adopts Minority View: No — Holds It Error to Do So

Sali v. Corona Reg'l Med. Ctr., 889 F.3d 623 (9th Cir. 2018): Marlyn Sali and Deborah Spriggs ("Sali and Spriggs") appeal the district court's denial of class certific ...
Sali v. Corona Reg'l Med. Ctr., 889 F.3d 623 (9th Cir. 2018): Marlyn Sali and Deborah Spriggs ("Sali and Spriggs") appeal the district court's denial of class certification in this putative class action alleging employment claims against Corona Regional…
Continue Reading

Lay Opinion Testimony: Officer May Analyze Video for Jury, Which Makes Final Determination — Opinion Within Rule 701 As It Is Based on Knowledge Common to Members of the Community, Not Specialized Knowledge or Expertise

State v. Tucker, 2018 WL 4179079 (Table), 2018 WI App 62 (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2018) (unpublished): *1 ¶ 1 Johnnie Lee Tucker appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree intentional homicide and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon. A jury convicted Tucker of both cou ...
State v. Tucker, 2018 WL 4179079 (Table), 2018 WI App 62 (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2018) (unpublished): *1 ¶ 1 Johnnie Lee Tucker appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree intentional homicide and one count of …
Continue Reading

Side-Switching Expert Must Have Confidential Information from First Client to Warrant Disqualification — No Fiduciary Relationship Exists Between Music Publisher & Composer

Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 27680, 2018 WL 4654729 (9th Cir. Sept. 28, 2018): This copyright case involves a claim that Led Zeppelin copied key portions of ...
Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 27680, 2018 WL 4654729 (9th Cir. Sept. 28, 2018): This copyright case involves a claim that Led Zeppelin copied key portions of its timeless hit "Stairway to Heaven" from the song …
Continue Reading
Previous74757677787980Next

Recent Posts

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

There Is No Good-Faith Defense For Issuing An Overly Burdensome Subpoena

Purposes of Rule 37 and Section 1927 Sanctions

While Rule 11 Doesn’t Apply to Appellate Proceedings (Unless It Has Been Incorporated in Local Appellate Rules), Rule 11 Caselaw Is Looked to for Guidance in Interpreting Applicable Sanctions Powers on Appeal

Rule 11 Sanctions & Appellate Review: Abuse of Discretion Standard Applies Unless Sanctions Are Based Solely (Not Just in Part) on Legal Issues, in Which Case Review Is De Novo

Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions for Altering Expert’s 26(a)(2)(B) Report — Without the Expert’s Knowledge or Approval — by Converting It from PDF to Word, Changing Headings and Other Formatting, and Omitting a Page of Relevant Text and Appendices, Even Though Expert Testified That The Overall Substance of the Report Was Unchanged — Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions May Be Reversed If Failure to Comply with Discovery Order Was Due to Misunderstanding or Inability to Comply

Spoliation: Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) Imposes a Higher Standard — Intent — Than Fourth Circuit Law Previously Applied to Spoliation of Electronically-Stored Information (And Still Does As to Non-ESI) — Willfulness vs. Intent

Inherent Power and § 1927 Sanctions: Removal of counsel from case, referral for disciplinary action, and award of fees and costs for assaulting opposing counsel at deposition — Failure to request hearing waive any right to a hearing — Notice and opportunity to be heard required before sua sponte sanctions imposed, whether under Rule 11, the inherent power of the court or § 1927 — Notice may come from court or opposing counsel — Order imposing sanctions cannot provide notice of sanctions — Nature of bad faith requirement for inherent power sanctions: bad faith to obstruct the judicial process or bring about violation of a court order — Sanctions proceeding need not defer (Younger abstention) to disciplinary proceeding involving the same conduct — Sanctions proceeding doesn’t threaten to interfere with disciplinary proceeding — Why District Court is accorded significant deference in matters concerning attorney’s fees

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice