Does 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a) authorize discovery for use in a private international arbitration? Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 542 U.S. 241 (2004), it was well-settled that a private international arbitration tribunal was not ‛a foreign or international tribunal“ within § 1782. Intel, however, relied heav ...

Rich Rosen of Paul Weiss has written an excellent article in the current issue of the BNA Securities Regulation & Law Report that comprehensively explores the last two years' (Nov. 2004 to Nov. 2006) judicial decisions applying the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Paul Weiss has poste ...

The Recent Articles page contains a new article addressing (1) federal rule changes that are expected to go into effect on December 1, 2007; (2) the activity of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules dealing with experts and summary judgment; and (3) the Standing Committee's Time Computation Project. ...

Judge Hudson of the Eastern District of Virginia ruled on January 16, 2007, that, even if an appellant cannot demonstrate a likelihood of prevailing on appeal, if the appellant raises a significant issue of first impression that the Court of Appeals may resolve differently, the appellant has ‛at least demonstrated a substantial case on the merits. A stay may ther ...

Under many states’ laws, a novation agreement — under which a new party is substituted for an original contracting party — terminates the prior contract between the parties. Does that apply to an arbitration clause in the underlying contract? Goshaw Dedicated Ltd. v. Portsmouth Settlement Co. I, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91036 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 18, 2006), holds tha ...

The defendant in a criminal securities fraud prosecution, United States v. Berger, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1013 (9th Cir. Jan. 18, 2007), was charged with making false statements in SEC filings. Relying on the reasoning of Kungys v. United States, 485 U.S. 759 (1988), an INS case, the defendant argued that the government was obliged to prove -- not that the filings we ...

Since 1993, Rule 11(c)(1)(A) has required that Rule 11 sanctions be sought in a separate motion that is served in ordinary course but may not presented to the court if the opposing party withdraws or corrects the challenged paper or contention within 21 days of receipt of the motion. Failure to afford 21 days' grace before filing the motion requires denial of t ...

In re County of Erie, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 26 (2d Cir. Jan. 3, 2007), the Second Circuit addressed whether "the attorney-client privilege protects communications that pass between a government lawyer having no policymaking authority and a public official, where those communications assess the legality of a policy and propose alternative policies in that light." ...

Yesterday, the Seventh Circuit affirmed dismissal of negligent misrepresentation, common law fraud and securities fraud claims (the latter on loss causation grounds) against PriceWaterhouse Coopers in Tricontinental Indus. Ltd. v. PwC, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 914 (7th Cir. Jan. 17, 2007). ...

No good deed goes unpunished. A State Farm policyholder had a serious home fire caused by a defective kitchen appliance. State Farm responded within a day and sent in a fire investigator who determined that a toaster oven instigated the fire. State Farm preserved the toaster oven and other potential igniters and authorized a demolition repair company to come i ...