Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

From Partain v. Isgur, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15730 (5th Cir. July 28, 2010): [T]o the extent Partain seeks to recover against the United States under the RICO statute, no waiver of the government's immunity extends to such laws. See McNeily v. United States, 6 F.3d 343, 350 (5th Cir. 1993).
From Partain v. Isgur, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15730 (5th Cir. July 28, 2010): [T]o the extent Partain seeks to recover against the United States under the RICO statute, no waiver of the government’s immunity extends to such laws. See…
From Moore v. Napolitano, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70892 (D.D.C. July 15, 2010): Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) and [D.D.C.] Local Civil Rule 72.2(b) allow a party to seek reconsideration of a magistrate judge's decision in a discovery dispute. "On review, the magistrate judge's decision is entitled to great deference unless it is cl ...
From Moore v. Napolitano, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70892 (D.D.C. July 15, 2010): Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) and [D.D.C.] Local Civil Rule 72.2(b) allow a party to seek reconsideration of a magistrate judge’s decision in a discovery dispute.…
From Securities and Exchange Commission v. Platforms Wireless Int’l Corp., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15328 (9th Cir. July 27, 2010): [Rule 54(b)] Platforms questions the propriety of the district court's Rule 54(b) judgment resting on the underlying partial summary judgment. Rule 54(b) permits a district court to enter judgme ...
From Securities and Exchange Commission v. Platforms Wireless Int’l Corp., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15328 (9th Cir. July 27, 2010): [Rule 54(b)] Platforms questions the propriety of the district court’s Rule 54(b) judgment resting on the underlying partial summary judgment.…
From Meidinger v. Healthcare Indus. Oligopoly, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16448 (11th Cir. Aug. 9, 2010): [Rule 11 and Res Judicata] "A plaintiff may be sanctioned under Rule 11 for filing claims barred by res judicata." Thomas [v. Evans, 880 F.2d 1235, 1240 (11th Cir. 1989). [Note: Because res j ...
From Meidinger v. Healthcare Indus. Oligopoly, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16448 (11th Cir. Aug. 9, 2010): [Rule 11 and Res Judicata] “A plaintiff may be sanctioned under Rule 11 for filing claims barred by res judicata.” Thomas [v. Evans, 880…
From In re Ins. Brokerage Antitrust Litig., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17107 (3d Cir. Aug. 16, 2010): 1. Legal Standards a. Section 1962(c) i. The Enterprise Element ***After the District Court had dismissed plaintiffs' claims, and after we had heard argument in this appeal, the Supreme Court decided Boyle v. ...
From In re Ins. Brokerage Antitrust Litig., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17107 (3d Cir. Aug. 16, 2010): 1. Legal Standards a. Section 1962(c) i. The Enterprise Element ***After the District Court had dismissed plaintiffs’ claims, and after we had heard…
From In re Plumeri, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80256 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2010): Bankruptcy debtor Saundra Plumeri ("Debtor") and her attorney, Richard D. Lamborn ("Lamborn"), appeal from an Order of the Honorable Martin Glenn, United States Bankruptcy Judge, imposing sanctions against Lamborn and awarding attorney's fees to appellee 64th Stree ...
From In re Plumeri, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80256 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2010): Bankruptcy debtor Saundra Plumeri (“Debtor”) and her attorney, Richard D. Lamborn (“Lamborn”), appeal from an Order of the Honorable Martin Glenn, United States Bankruptcy Judge, imposing sanctions…
From Rectrix Aerodrome Ctrs., Inc. v. Barnstable Municipal Airport Comm’n, 610 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 2010): Rectrix claims that restricting Rectrix from selling jet fuels at the airport violates section 2 of the Sherman Act, which forbids monopolization, attempted monopolization and conspiracies to monopolize. 15 U.S.C. § 2. The district ...
From Rectrix Aerodrome Ctrs., Inc. v. Barnstable Municipal Airport Comm’n, 610 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 2010): Rectrix claims that restricting Rectrix from selling jet fuels at the airport violates section 2 of the Sherman Act, which forbids monopolization, attempted monopolization…
From SDS Korea Co. v. SDS USA, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80223 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2010): Under Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant may move to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The plaintiff then bears the burden of demonstrating that jurisdiction exists. Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor C ...
From SDS Korea Co. v. SDS USA, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80223 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2010): Under Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant may move to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The…
From Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80703 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2010): "[T]he burden on the removing party is to prove that the joinder of the in-state parties was improper- -that is, to show that sham defendants were added to defeat jurisdiction." Smallwood v. I11. Cent. R.R. Co., 385 F.3d 568, 575 (5th ...
From Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80703 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2010): “[T]he burden on the removing party is to prove that the joinder of the in-state parties was improper- -that is, to show…
From Silverman vs. Motorola, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81671 (N.D. Ill. June 29, 2010): In its motion, KPMG seeks to quash the subpoenas issued to it by Plaintiffs and to preclude Plaintiffs from questioning KPMG, through Mr. Pratt and Mr. Parrott, regarding the PCAOB inspection process. Resolution of KPMG's motion turns on the statut ...
From Silverman vs. Motorola, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81671 (N.D. Ill. June 29, 2010): In its motion, KPMG seeks to quash the subpoenas issued to it by Plaintiffs and to preclude Plaintiffs from questioning KPMG, through Mr. Pratt and…

Recent Posts

Archives