New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Spoliation: Another Circuit (D.C.) Questions, in Dicta, Whether The Doctrine of Spoliation Applies in Criminal Cases

 In re Baluchi, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 8064 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 13, 2020): Guantanamo detainee Ammar al Baluchi is one of five co-defendants facing capital charges related to the planning of the September ...
In re Baluchi, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 8064 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 13, 2020): Guantanamo detainee Ammar al Baluchi is one of five co-defendants facing capital charges related to the planning of the September 11 attacks. Al Baluchi alleges that prior …
Continue Reading

Sanctions: Tangible Spoliation Requires Bad Faith — Eighth Circuit Has Still Never Applied Doctrine of Spoliation in Criminal Case

 United States v. Warren, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 6901 (8th Cir. Mar. 5, 2020): A jury found Bruce Zachary Pugh and Darren Lamont Warren guilty of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of
United States v. Warren, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 6901 (8th Cir. Mar. 5, 2020): A jury found Bruce Zachary Pugh and Darren Lamont Warren guilty of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C)…
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions: Disbarment Appropriate for Intentional Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit or Misrepresentation — Failure to Provide Requested Financial Info Justifies Court’s Not Exploring Lesser, Financial Sanctions

 In re Ray, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 6710 (5th Cir. Mar. 3, 2020): Attorney Ryan Eugene Ray appeals his permanent disbarment from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The district court im ...
In re Ray, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 6710 (5th Cir. Mar. 3, 2020): Attorney Ryan Eugene Ray appeals his permanent disbarment from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The district court imposed this sanction after determining…
Continue Reading

Sanctions Award Limited to Compensation — 37(e) Spoliation Award Reduced by Amount of Fees for Anticipated Deposition That Never Occurred

Spencer v. Lunada Bay Boys, 2020 WL 1490922 (9th Cir. 2020) (unpublished): MEMORANDUM* Cory Spencer, Diana Reed, and the Coastal Protection Rangers (CPR) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of City of Palos Verdes Estates and its former police chief. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand so ...
Spencer v. Lunada Bay Boys, 2020 WL 1490922 (9th Cir. 2020) (unpublished): MEMORANDUM* Cory Spencer, Diana Reed, and the Coastal Protection Rangers (CPR) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of City of Palos Verdes Estates and…
Continue Reading

Sanctions: Clearly Time-Barred Claim Violates Both R. 11 & §1927 — Appeals: Clock Starts When Claims & Sanctions Decided — Not Restarted by Motion for Fees on Fees — No FRAP 38 without Separate Motion

 Faulkner v. Shelby Cty. Sch. Sys., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 8008 (6th Cir. Mar. 12, 2020) (unpublished): These appeals are less complicated than the caption implies. The Shelby County, Tennessee School ...
Faulkner v. Shelby Cty. Sch. Sys., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 8008 (6th Cir. Mar. 12, 2020) (unpublished): These appeals are less complicated than the caption implies. The Shelby County, Tennessee School System terminated its contract with Katoria Williams in December …
Continue Reading

Sanctions: No Appellate Jurisdiction Until Amount of Sanction Is Set — No Final Order Exists Until Then

Sanctions: No Appellate Jurisdiction Until Amount of Sanction Is Set United States v. Carter, 2019 WL 8231644 (10th Cir. Dec. 5, 2019): ORDER *1 Appellants in these related appeals are Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSAs) working in the District of Kansas. Following receipt of their docketing statements and review of the di ...
Sanctions: No Appellate Jurisdiction Until Amount of Sanction Is Set United States v. Carter, 2019 WL 8231644 (10th Cir. Dec. 5, 2019): ORDER *1 Appellants in these related appeals are Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSAs) working in the District of…
Continue Reading

Sanctions: Rule 11 Requires Substantiation, §1927 Bars Waste of Judicial Resources, Multiplication of Proceedings & Causing Unfair Delay, Inherent Power Bars Pursuing Claim to Harass — Persisting in Arg in Face of Contrary Reg & Case Law Violates All 3

 Collar v. Abalux, Inc., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9967, 2020 WL 1528072 (11th Cir. March 31, 2020) (unpublished): PER CURIAM: *1 K. David Kelly, an attorney, appeals a sanction against ...
Collar v. Abalux, Inc., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9967, 2020 WL 1528072 (11th Cir. March 31, 2020) (unpublished): PER CURIAM: *1 K. David Kelly, an attorney, appeals a sanction against him and his law firm, J.H. Zidell, P.A., for…
Continue Reading

Procedural Due Process Requires Notice of Grounds For, And Potential Types Of, Sanctions — Abuse of Discretion to Impose Inherent Power Sanction Requiring Warning Paragraph On First Page Of Complaint Without Notice

Malem Med., Ltd. v. Theos Med. Sys., Inc., 2020 WL 1028062 (9th Cir. Mar. 3, 2020) (unpublished): MEMORANDUM** *1 Appellants Theos Medical Systems, Inc. and Saket Bhatia (collectively “Theos”) appeal the district court’s order requiring Theos ...
Malem Med., Ltd. v. Theos Med. Sys., Inc., 2020 WL 1028062 (9th Cir. Mar. 3, 2020) (unpublished): MEMORANDUM** *1 Appellants Theos Medical Systems, Inc. and Saket Bhatia (collectively “Theos”) appeal the district court’s order requiring Theos to include a …
Continue Reading

Party’s Social Media Account = 801(d)(2) Admission If Authenticated — Evidence That Account Holder Used Name Based on Party’s & Sent Messages to Party’s Friend, Plus Photos of Party on Page, Suffice

 State v. Durr, 2020 Ariz. App. Unpub. LEXIS 127 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2020) (unpublished):P1 Devar Antonio Durr appeals from his convictions and sentences for armed robbery, kidnapping, aggravated assault, and first-degree b ...
State v. Durr, 2020 Ariz. App. Unpub. LEXIS 127 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2020) (unpublished):P1 Devar Antonio Durr appeals from his convictions and sentences for armed robbery, kidnapping, aggravated assault, and first-degree burglary. Durr contends that the superior court…
Continue Reading

While Statute of Limitations May Be Raised on 12(b)(6), Complaint Needn’t Plead Around It — Burden on Def. — Rule 3.7 Disqualification (Advocate-Witness) Generally Triggered by Jury — Issue Is Trial Taint, Necessity of Testimony — Rule Violation

 Hirsch v. Rehs Galleries, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32926 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 2020): Plaintiff Steven Hirsch ("Plaintiff") brings this action against Defendant Rehs Galleries, Inc. ("Defendant&quo ...
Hirsch v. Rehs Galleries, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32926 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 2020): Plaintiff Steven Hirsch ("Plaintiff") brings this action against Defendant Rehs Galleries, Inc. ("Defendant"), asserting claims under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq., including…
Continue Reading
Previous26272829303132Next

Recent Posts

Rule 37 Default Judgment Sanction: (1) Abuse of Discretion Review = Legal Conclusions De Novo. Factual Findings for Clear Error — (2) Client May Be Sanctioned for Misconduct of Its Counsel, Though Here Client Was Directly Involved in Bad Faith Misbehavior — (3) Is There A Difference, Under Rule 11 As Opposed to Rule 37, Concerning Whether A Client Can Be Sanctioned for Its Counsel’s Misconduct? — (4) While Sanctions of Last Resort (Dismissal/Default) Are Apt Only If Lesser Sanctions Wouldn’t Ensure Compliance, Rule 37 Doesn’t Require the Vain Gesture of First Imposing Lessert Sanctions When It Is Clear They Would be Ineffective — (5) Court’s Reconsideration of Non-Final Orders Is Governed by Rule 54(b), And Court’s Discretion under That Rule Is Governed by the Law-of-the-Case-Doctrine

RICO: (1) Special Pleading Requirements? — (2) Although Enterprise Must Be More Than a Summation of the Predicate Acts, The Predicate Acts Can Demonstrate the Existence of the Enterprise — (3) Requirement That Association-in-Fact Exist For Purposes Other Than Just to Commit Predicate Acts Merely Requires Continuity — (4) To State an Association-in-Fact Enterprise Consisting of One Natural Person and Collection of Legal Fictions Requires Factual Detail As to How They Acted Together — (5) “A § 1962(c) Enterprise Must Be More Than An Association of Individuals Or Entities Conducting the Normal Affairs of a Defendant Corporation” (Good Quote)

RICO: (1) Fee Award May Exceed Amount Recovered — Strict Proportionality Not Required — (2) Nonmonetary Benefits and Injunctive Relief Recovered Also Relevant Factors — (3) Loss on Some Claims Need Not Result in Lowered Fees, Especially When Both Arise Out of The Same Nucleus of Operative Facts

RICO: Indirect Purchasers (Car Buyers/Renters) Lack Standing to Sue Manufacturers for RICO Violations Even Though Intermediaries (Auto Dealer Direct Purchasers) Lack Any Damages

RICO: Statutory Requirement that RICO Be Liberally Construed Does Not Establish a More Liberal Pleading Standard for RICO Claims — “To Be Sure, Adequately Pleading a RICO Claim Can Be Challenging” (Good Quote) — Court May Dismiss Action Pursuant to Rule 41(b) Absent A Motion

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

There Is No Good-Faith Defense For Issuing An Overly Burdensome Subpoena

Purposes of Rule 37 and Section 1927 Sanctions

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice