New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Declaration Filed on Summary Judgment Is Work Product until Filed & Not a Discoverable “Document” But Contents Must Have Been Disclosed in Discovery

Chelan Cnty., Wash. v. Bank of Am., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89414 (E.D. Wash. July 9, 2015): II. Evidentiary Issues A. Motion to Strike Declaration Plaintiff moves to strike the declaration of Lisa Stensgaard as a sanction for Defendant's alleged violation of discovery obligations. EC ...
Chelan Cnty., Wash. v. Bank of Am., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89414 (E.D. Wash. July 9, 2015): II. Evidentiary Issues A. Motion to Strike Declaration Plaintiff moves to strike the declaration of Lisa Stensgaard as a sanction for Defendant's alleged…
Continue Reading

Sanctions — Dismissal with Prejudice for Failure to Amend Complaint in Compliance with Judicial Instructions — Implicit Finding Lesser Sanctions Wouldn’t Suffice — Good Quotes on Need for Clear Pleadings, Seriousness of Filing Suit

Nurse v Sheraton Atlanta Hotel, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11912 (11th Cir. July 10, 2015): Ronald A. Nurse, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's sua sponte dismissal with prejudice of his amended complaint, which asserted 21 claims against the Sheraton Atlanta Hotel, Walden University, and two university em ...
Nurse v Sheraton Atlanta Hotel, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11912 (11th Cir. July 10, 2015): Ronald A. Nurse, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's sua sponte dismissal with prejudice of his amended complaint, which asserted 21 claims against the…
Continue Reading

Internet Chats — Party’s Statements Are Admissions and Unidentified Counterparties’ Statements Not Hearsay when Admitted to Provide Context for Party’s Statements

United States v. Beckman, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12238 (6th Cir. July 13, 2015): III. Admission of Chats with Unidentified Individuals *** Beckman also claims that the chats with unidentified persons constituted inadmissible hearsay. But Beckman concedes he is jimmyab2010; thus hi ...
United States v. Beckman, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12238 (6th Cir. July 13, 2015): III. Admission of Chats with Unidentified Individuals *** Beckman also claims that the chats with unidentified persons constituted inadmissible hearsay. But Beckman concedes he is jimmyab2010; …
Continue Reading

Internet Evidence & Residual Hearsay Exception — Reliability — Wikipedia (No), Blogs (Not These) — “Considering the Trustworthiness of a Document Cannot Be Punted when Analyzing Admissibility” (Good Quotes)

Kagen v. Kagen, 2015 Mich. App. LEXIS 1385 (Mich. Ct. App. July 14, 2015):  We previously remanded this matter to the circuit court for reconsideration of whether securing vaccinations for the parties' minor children was in the children's best interests. Kagen v Kagen, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Co ...
Kagen v. Kagen, 2015 Mich. App. LEXIS 1385 (Mich. Ct. App. July 14, 2015):  We previously remanded this matter to the circuit court for reconsideration of whether securing vaccinations for the parties' minor children was in the children's best interests. …
Continue Reading

Facebook Messages Authenticated by Testimony That Sender Gave Recipient His Screen Name; Icon on That Facebook Page Resembles Sender; and Messages’ Contents Describing Events Known to Both

J.B. v. State, 2015 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 736 (Ind. Ct. App. July 1, 2015): P1 J.B. appeals an adjudication that would constitute Theft, a class D felony,1 and Dangerous Possession of a Firearm, a class A misdemeanor2 if committed by an ...
J.B. v. State, 2015 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 736 (Ind. Ct. App. July 1, 2015): P1 J.B. appeals an adjudication that would constitute Theft, a class D felony,1 and Dangerous Possession of a Firearm, a class A misdemeanor2…
Continue Reading

Attorney’s Fees — Because Rule 54 Requires a Motion No Later Than 14 Days after Entry of Judgment, Motion May Be Filed Prior to Judgment — § 1927 Sanctions Require Conduct Akin to Bad Faith in 2d Circuit

16 Casa Duse, LLC v.Merkin, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11053 (2d Cir. June 29, 2015): V. Fees and Sanctions Merkin and Reichman argue that the district court made legal errors in awarding fees and costs to Casa Duse under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505, and imposing sanctions against Reichman in the form of fees and costs under ...
16 Casa Duse, LLC v.Merkin, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11053 (2d Cir. June 29, 2015): V. Fees and Sanctions Merkin and Reichman argue that the district court made legal errors in awarding fees and costs to Casa Duse under the…
Continue Reading

Rule 12(g) Doesn’t Bar Defense Available on Earlier MTD If Court Didn’t Reach Merits — Failure to Perform Contract= RICO Injury — Corp + Subs ≠ Enterprise — Providing Services & Knowledge ≠ Operation & Mgmt. — Reliance, Good Quotes

In re Aetna UCR Litig., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84600 (D.N.J. June 30, 2015): This matter comes before the Court on three separate motions: (1) plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a third amended consolidated complaint; (2) defendant Aetna's motion to dismiss the second and third amended consolidated complaint; and (3) the moti ...
In re Aetna UCR Litig., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84600 (D.N.J. June 30, 2015): This matter comes before the Court on three separate motions: (1) plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a third amended consolidated complaint; (2) defendant Aetna's motion…
Continue Reading

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence — Wayback Machine Credited over Party’s Submitted Evidence

Erickson v. Neb. Machinery Co., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87417 (N.D. Cal. July 6, 2015): In this copyright infringement suit, plaintiffs Jim Erickson and his production company allege that defendant Nebraska Machinery Company displayed ten of his photos on its website without permission. *** 1  
Erickson v. Neb. Machinery Co., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87417 (N.D. Cal. July 6, 2015): In this copyright infringement suit, plaintiffs Jim Erickson and his production company allege that defendant Nebraska Machinery Company displayed ten of his photos on its…
Continue Reading

Sanctions — Summary Judgment Granting Inherent Power Sanctions Reversed — Factual Issues as to Whether There Was Bad Faith or Willful Misconduct Required Evidentiary Hearing — Improper to Make Factual Findings on SJ Where Facts Disputed

Konop v. BMK Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11772 (9th Cir. July 8, 2015): Robert Konop appeals the district court's order affirming in part and vacating in part the bankruptcy court's award of sanctions against him. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(1), see Congrejo Invs., LLC v. Mann  ( ...
Konop v. BMK Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11772 (9th Cir. July 8, 2015): Robert Konop appeals the district court's order affirming in part and vacating in part the bankruptcy court's award of sanctions against him. We have…
Continue Reading

Text Authentication by Absence of Messages at Times Alleged Sender Is Indisposed, Name & Phone Number on Messages, Consistency of Content with Events in Alleged Sender’s Life

Matter of Detention of H.N., 2015 Wash. App. LEXIS 1433 (Wash. Ct. App. July 6, 2015): H.N. appeals the order committing her to involuntary treatment. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted as substantive evidence e-mailed screenshots of text messages that a medical expert used as part of her opinion testimony. ...
Matter of Detention of H.N., 2015 Wash. App. LEXIS 1433 (Wash. Ct. App. July 6, 2015): H.N. appeals the order committing her to involuntary treatment. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted as substantive evidence e-mailed…
Continue Reading
Previous205206207208209210211Next

Recent Posts

FRAP 38 Sanctions — Sixth Circuit Usually Declines to Impose FRAP 38 Sanctions Unless An Improper Purpose Was Behind the Appeal

FRAP 38: Permissible for Appeals Court to Affirm Sanctions But Deny FRAP 38 Sanctions for Appeal — A Defendant’s Voluntary Cessation of Complained of Behavior Does Not Moot a Case Unless It Is Clear That The Behavior Could Not Reasonably Be Expected to Recur

Rule 11: Violation of 21 Day Safe Harbor “Overlook[ed]” As Non-Prejudicial by First Circuit — “Rule 11 Monetary Sanctions Must Be Reasonable” (Good Quote) — Rule 11(c)(4) Requires Consideration of Offender’s Ability to Pay

Temporary Restraining Order = Preliminary Injunction: 3 Supreme Court Cases (TRO=PI x 3)

Rule 37(c)(1) Sanctions — Exclusion of Untimely Expert Report — Eighth Circuit’s 4-Factor Test

RICO: So Insubstantial A Claim As to Fail to Confer Subject Matter Jurisdiction

RICO: Distinctiveness Issues Most Likely to Appear When The Enterprise Is An Entity Capable of Being Sued, Like A Corporation

Supreme Court: RICO: (1) Injuries to Business or Property That Derive from a Personal Injury Are Recoverable — (2) “Injury” Is Interchangeable in Meaning with “Harm” And Other Terms Connoting Loss — (3) “The Clayton Act and § 1964(c) Are Not ‘Interchangeable’” (Good Quote)— (4) (4) “You Can’t Replace Something With Nothing” (Good Quote) — (5) The Recoverable Economic Harm Flowing from Personal Injuries, Like All Other Recoverable RICO Harm, Must be Direct — (6)” Harm Resulting from a Single Tort Is Not a Ticket to Federal Court for Treble Damages” (Good Quote)

FRAP 38 Sanctions: Eleventh Circuit Generally Declines to Impose FRAP 38 Sanctions on Pro Se Appellants Absent a History of Frivolous Litigation or an Explicit Warning

Inherent Power Sanctions for Bad Faith in (1) Misrepresenting Patent Ownership in Amended Complaint and (2) Failing to Supplement Discovery Responses to Rectify This after the Discovery Period Had Closed, Both of Which Led to Continued Litigation After One Plaintiff Had Lost Standing — The Duty To Supplement Discovery Responses under Rule 26(e) Continues Even After The Discovery Period Has Closed — Use of Inherent Power to Sanction Violation of Local Rules That Lack Sanctions Provisions (Sanction Reversed on Other Grounds)

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2025 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice