New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

A Motion for Reconsideration Is Not a Vehicle for Relitigating Old Issues, Presenting New Theories, Securing a Rehearing on the Merits or Otherwise Taking a Second Bite of the Apple — Good Quote

In re Adelphia Commc’ns Corp. Secs. & Deriv. Litig., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6823 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2015): [A] motion for reconsideration "is not a vehicle for relitigating old issues, presenting the case under new theories, securing a rehearing on the merits or otherwise taking a second bite at the apple."
In re Adelphia Commc’ns Corp. Secs. & Deriv. Litig., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6823 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2015): [A] motion for reconsideration "is not a vehicle for relitigating old issues, presenting the case under new theories, securing a rehearing on …
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions for Witness Tampering — Factors — Range of Available Sanctions

Michael v Boutwell, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136838 (N.D. Miss. Oct. 7, 2015): As stated above, there are three motions currently pending in this action: (1) Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or for summary judgment, Doc. #59; (2) Plaintiffs' m ...
Michael v Boutwell, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136838 (N.D. Miss. Oct. 7, 2015): As stated above, there are three motions currently pending in this action: (1) Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of…
Continue Reading

Does Violation of Statute That Provides No Claim Bar RICO Claim for the Violation? — Commercial Relationship vs. Enterprise — Oper. & Mgmt.: Performing Services for Other Entity vs. Enterprise — Benefits of Exhibits to Complaint on 12(b)(6)

Bible v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14503 (7th Cir. Aug. 18, 2015): Plaintiff Bryana Bible obtained a student loan under the Federal Family Education Loan Program. She defaulted in 2012 but promptly agreed to enter into a rehabilitation agreement that required her to make a series of reduced [*2]  mo ...
Bible v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14503 (7th Cir. Aug. 18, 2015): Plaintiff Bryana Bible obtained a student loan under the Federal Family Education Loan Program. She defaulted in 2012 but promptly agreed to enter …
Continue Reading

May Court Transfer Venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 Only When Subject Matter Jurisdiction Is Lacking, Or Is the Absence of Personal Jurisdiction Enough? Circuit Split

Family Wireless #1, LLCv. Auto. Techns., Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115810 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 1, 2015): 1   The Court may also transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. It states that when a court "finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court shall, if it is in the interests of justice transfer such action ...
Family Wireless #1, LLCv. Auto. Techns., Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115810 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 1, 2015): 1   The Court may also transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. It states that when a court "finds that there is…
Continue Reading

2009 Revision to Rule 15(a) Can’t Be Read to Permit Amendment of Complaint “Once As a Matter of Course … after” Motion to Dismiss If Complaint Was Already Amended Once before the Motion Was Served

U.S. ex rel. D’Agostino v. EV3, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17214 (1st Cir. Sept. 30, 2015): Plaintiff-appellant Jeffrey D'Agostino (the relator) challenges both the dismissal of his qui tam action and the antecedent denial of leave to further amend his complaint. For obvious reasons, we consider the second challenge first. That ...
U.S. ex rel. D’Agostino v. EV3, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17214 (1st Cir. Sept. 30, 2015): Plaintiff-appellant Jeffrey D'Agostino (the relator) challenges both the dismissal of his qui tam action and the antecedent denial of leave to further amend…
Continue Reading

Must the SEC Plead and Prove Scienter in a Deceit-of-Auditors Case under 17 C.F.R. § 240.13b2-2 — Circuit Split

SEC v. Goldstone, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116847 (D. N.M. Aug. 22, 2015): 5. Deceit-of-Auditors Claims. Exchange Act rule 13b2-2 "provides that directors or officers shall not make or cause to be made a materially misleading statement or omission to an accountant in connection with SEC filings, among other t ...
SEC v. Goldstone, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116847 (D. N.M. Aug. 22, 2015): 5. Deceit-of-Auditors Claims. Exchange Act rule 13b2-2 "provides that directors or officers shall not make or cause to be made a materially misleading statement or omission…
Continue Reading

Facebook Messages from Quadriplegic Authenticated by Testimony He Can Operate Cell Phone, Text & Use Facebook, Participant in Conversation Recognized His Facebook Account & Messages Matched His Manner of Communicating

United States v. Barnes, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17222 (5th Cir. Sept. 30, 2015): Martel Torres Barnes ("Barnes"), Roger Randale Jones ("Jones"), and Kentorre D. Hall ("Hall") (collectively, the "Appellants") were charged in a superseding indictment with: (1) conspiracy to possess with intent to di ...
United States v. Barnes, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17222 (5th Cir. Sept. 30, 2015): Martel Torres Barnes ("Barnes"), Roger Randale Jones ("Jones"), and Kentorre D. Hall ("Hall") (collectively, the "Appellants") were charged in a superseding indictment with: (1) conspiracy to…
Continue Reading

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence — Court May Take Notice of Fact News Articles Published But Not Substance — Same for Government Records in California

Inewsource v. Superior Court, 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3629 (Cal. Ct. App. May 26, 2015): Petitioner inewsource seeks disclosure of documents from real party in interest North County Transit District (the District) under the California Public Records Act (PRA). (Gov. Code, 6250 et seq.)[1] The documents at issue reflect th ...
Inewsource v. Superior Court, 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3629 (Cal. Ct. App. May 26, 2015): Petitioner inewsource seeks disclosure of documents from real party in interest North County Transit District (the District) under the California Public Records Act (PRA).…
Continue Reading

Are Attorney’s Fees and Not Just Costs Awardable under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(d) for a Prior Action That Was Voluntarily Dismissed and Based on Or Including the Same Claim Against the Same Defendant? — Circuit Split

Raniolo v. Southport, LLC, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116047 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 1, 2015): This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Petition and Request for Attorneys' Fees and Costs [ECF No. 24] and Defendants' Memo of Costs [ECF No. 29]. I.  FACTUAL BACKGROUND This lawsuit ...
Raniolo v. Southport, LLC, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116047 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 1, 2015): This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Petition and Request for Attorneys' Fees and Costs [ECF No. 24] and Defendants' Memo of Costs [ECF No.…
Continue Reading

RICO — Cover-Up Conspiracy Insufficiently Related to Original Conspiracy to Be Part of Same Pattern, Cannot Establish Open-Ended Continuity — Attorney Fees in Bringing RICO Claim ≠ RICO Injury — Factually Pleading Conspiracy (8(a), Not 9(b))

The Knit With v. Knitting Fever, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15575 (3d Cir. Sept. 2, 2015): The Knit With ("TKW") appeals several orders the district court entered in TKW's suit alleging various claims under state and federal law. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the district court. I.
The Knit With v. Knitting Fever, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15575 (3d Cir. Sept. 2, 2015): The Knit With ("TKW") appeals several orders the district court entered in TKW's suit alleging various claims under state and federal law. For…
Continue Reading
Previous199200201202203204205Next

Recent Posts

Spoliation: Dismissal Under Rule 37(e)(2) and Monetary Sanctions Under Rule 37(e)(1), Implicitly Reading The “Or” Between 37(e)(1) and 37(e)(2) As Conjunctive, Not Disjunctive — Clear Error Standard of Review for District Court’s Intent (= Bad Faith) Finding under 37(e)(2)(C) — Additional Monetary Sanctions Imposed on Claimants under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Rule 37(a)(5) — No Right to Jury Determination of Intent under Rule 37(e)(2) — “Substantially Justified” in Rule 37(a)(5) Has Same Meaning As In Equal Access to Justice Act and Thus Rule 11 — Meaning of “Unreasonable and Vexatious” in 7th Circuit

nherent Power Sanction of Dismissal — Preponderance of the Evidence Burden of Proof, Not Clear and Convincing Evidence (7th Circuit)

§ 1927 Sanctions — Must A Lawyer Who Unreasonably and Vexatiously Multiplies Federal Court Proceedings Be Acting “As An Attorney” When Committing the Misconduct To Be Subject to Sanction under § 1927?

Rule 37 Sanctions — Unfamiliarity With Litigation Process Does Not Excuse Intentional Disregard of Court Order — Also Affirming Rule 26(g) Sanctions on Clients and Counsel for False Representations That All Responsive Documents Had Been Produced

Supreme Court: Notice of Appeal Filed After The Original Deadline But Before Reopening by The District Court Is Timely — It Relates Forward to The Date of The Order Making The Appeal Possible — Second Notice of Appeal After Reopening Unnecessary

Rule 37 Default Judgment: Second Circuit’s Four-Factor Test for Imposing Defaults and Three-Factor Test for Lifting Them

Rule 37 Default Judgment — Tenth Circuit Multifactor Test Is Not Exhaustive But a Non-Exclusive List of “Sometimes-Helpful Criteria Or Guide Posts”— Appeal from Preliminary Injunction Mooted by Entry of Permanent Injunction — Difficulty in Collecting Damages Award May Equal Irreparable Injury — A Monetary Award For Past Conduct Does Not Preclude A Permanent Injunction Against Similar Wrongful Conduct Likely To Occur In The Future

RICO: Cover-Up Within Limitations Period of Untimely RICO Violation “Was Merely A Continuation” Of The Original Injury And Could Not Be Used “As A ‘Bootstrap’ To Salvage [The] Time-Barred Claims–Declining to Apply Pinkerton Doctrine to Civil RICO Claims

Inherent Power — Circumstantial Evidence — Fact That Bad Faith May Be Shown by Establishing That Conduct Was So Egregious It Was Necessarily Committed in Bad Faith Does Not Mean That Bad Faith Must Be The Sole Explanation for The Bad Conduct

RICO Causation: Testing Labs’ Misstatements As to Alcohol Tests’ Efficacy Not Communicated to Plaintiffs’ Employers Did Not Cause Plaintiffs’ Professional Harm

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2025 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice