New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

RICO — No Closed-Ended Continuity If Only One Victim, Even If Acts Committed over Long Period of Time — No Open-Ended If Scheme Has a Clear and Terminable Goal (Which, Here, Was Achieved)

Daedalus Capital LLC v. Vinecombe, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15808 (11th Cir. Sept. 4, 2015): Appellants Daedalus Capital, LLC (Daedalus) and Lockwood Technology Corporation (LTC) appeal the district court's order granting partial summary judgment in favor of Appellees Bradford Vinecombe (Vinecombe), former president of LTC; Bruno Rieg ...
Daedalus Capital LLC v. Vinecombe, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15808 (11th Cir. Sept. 4, 2015): Appellants Daedalus Capital, LLC (Daedalus) and Lockwood Technology Corporation (LTC) appeal the district court's order granting partial summary judgment in favor of Appellees Bradford Vinecombe…
Continue Reading

Spoliation Sanctions — Sixth Circuit Test — To Prove Relevance, Movant Must Show Destroyed Evidence Was of Nature Alleged, Not Just Satisfy Rule 401 — Meaning of Abuse of Discretion

Yoder & Frey Auctioneers, Inc. v. EquipmentFacts, LLC, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24301 (6th Cir. Dec. 22, 2014): Defendant, EquipmentFacts, LLC ("Efacts"), appeals from the judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio imposing liability and damages in a civil suit brought by Plain ...
Yoder & Frey Auctioneers, Inc. v. EquipmentFacts, LLC, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24301 (6th Cir. Dec. 22, 2014): Defendant, EquipmentFacts, LLC ("Efacts"), appeals from the judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio imposing …
Continue Reading

Sanctions — Barring Litigant from Submitting Evidence at Summary Judgment under Rules 37 and 16(f) for Disobeying Orders and Failing to Attend Scheduled Conferences

Lasisi v. Follett Higher Education Grp., Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 142 (7th Cir. Jan. 6, 2015): case ended at summary judgment. Follett moved to strike Lasisi's evidence and statement of facts as a sanction for his failure to answer discovery, as earlier recommended by the magistrate judge. The district judge accepted the recomme ...
Lasisi v. Follett Higher Education Grp., Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 142 (7th Cir. Jan. 6, 2015): case ended at summary judgment. Follett moved to strike Lasisi's evidence and statement of facts as a sanction for his failure to answer…
Continue Reading

Sanctions — Dismissal under Rule 37 Is Extreme, Reserved for Flagrant Cases of Bad Faith — 4th Circuit’s 4-Factor Test — Lesser Sanctions Should Be Considered

Kelly v. Suntrust Bank, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 124 (4th Cir. Jan. 6, 2015): Freddie J. Kelly appeals the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his action against SunTrust Bank and credit reporting agencies Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, and TransUnion LLC. The district court dismissed Ke ...
Kelly v. Suntrust Bank, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 124 (4th Cir. Jan. 6, 2015): Freddie J. Kelly appeals the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his action against SunTrust Bank and credit reporting agencies Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information…
Continue Reading

Former Employee of Adversary as Adverse Party under Rule 611(c)(2)

See Jaffe v. Bank of Am., N.A., 395 Fed. App’x 583, 588–89 (11th Cir. 2010) (“Although Ross left Bank of America four years before the trial commenced, he was a[n] . . .  employee when the alleged misrepresentations may have occurred, and Bank of America's counsel represented him personally throughout the litigation.  Thus, Ross was in fact a ...
See Jaffe v. Bank of Am., N.A., 395 Fed. App’x 583, 588–89 (11th Cir. 2010) (“Although Ross left Bank of America four years before the trial commenced, he was a[n] . . .  employee when the alleged misrepresentations may have…
Continue Reading

No RICO Continuity Where Predicates Are Part of Single, Otherwise Lawful Transaction — Outside Lawyers Don’t Operate / Manage Client — No Liability for Routine Legal Services — Contract Claim in RICO Garb (Good Quotes)

Zastrow v. Houston Auto Imports Greenway Ltd., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9918 (5th Cir. June 12, 2015): Plaintiffs-Appellants Mark Zastrow and his company Heights Autohaus (collectively, "Zastrow") appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment on their claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizatio ...
Zastrow v. Houston Auto Imports Greenway Ltd., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9918 (5th Cir. June 12, 2015): Plaintiffs-Appellants Mark Zastrow and his company Heights Autohaus (collectively, "Zastrow") appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment on their claims under…
Continue Reading

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence — Governmental vs. Non-Governmental, Including Parties’, Websites — Purpose & Extent of Notice

Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entm’t Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84978 (C.D. Cal. Jan 30, 2015): On April 29, 2014, Terry T. Gerritsen filed this action against Katja Motion Picture Corporation ("Katja"), New Line Productions, Inc. ("New Line"), and Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. ("WB") (collectively, &qu ...
Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entm’t Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84978 (C.D. Cal. Jan 30, 2015): On April 29, 2014, Terry T. Gerritsen filed this action against Katja Motion Picture Corporation ("Katja"), New Line Productions, Inc. ("New Line"), and Warner…
Continue Reading

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence — Website Information as to Origins of, and Private v. Public Ownership of, Corporation to Determine Status as State Actor under § 1983 — When Is a Corporation a State Actor? — Factors

Guo v. Independent Chinese Ctr., Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108294 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2015): In this action, Plaintiff pro se, Zhi Guo, asserts civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a pendent state law claim against Independent Chinese Pen Center, Inc. ("ICPC"), National Endowment for Dem ...
Guo v. Independent Chinese Ctr., Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108294 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2015): In this action, Plaintiff pro se, Zhi Guo, asserts civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a pendent state law claim against Independent …
Continue Reading

No Rule 11 Sanctions for Derogatory Language in Brief Not Unfounded Legally or Factually — No § 1927 Sanctions for Failure to Grant Extension to File Brief — Local Rules, Judicial Discretion Determine Due Date

Waite v VCG Clark Cnty. Collection Serv., LLC, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4934 (9th Cir. Mar. 26, 2015): Waite also contends that the district court erred in denying her motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. That motion was premised on the contention that CCCS made false, unfounded, and offensive allegations i ...
Waite v VCG Clark Cnty. Collection Serv., LLC, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4934 (9th Cir. Mar. 26, 2015): Waite also contends that the district court erred in denying her motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.…
Continue Reading

Text / Email Authentication — Conduct Pursuant to Text Exchange Sufficient to Authenticate Disputed Texts — Authentication Issue Is for Jury — Court Need Not Be Persuaded Texts Are Authentic — Texts as Admissions

Cook v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2649 (Tex. Ct. App. Mar. 20, 2015): Appellant's conviction for cocaine delivery arises out of Appellant's sale of drugs to a confidential informant. The confidential informant, Lindsey Ford, testified that she had used and sold drugs in the past and that she was familiar with who sol ...
Cook v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2649 (Tex. Ct. App. Mar. 20, 2015): Appellant's conviction for cocaine delivery arises out of Appellant's sale of drugs to a confidential informant. The confidential informant, Lindsey Ford, testified that she had used …
Continue Reading
Previous195196197198199200201Next

Recent Posts

(1) RICO Pattern: Open-Ended Continuity — The Vendetta Exception — Jury Could Reasonably Infer That Scheme Directed at One Person, With Goal of Destroying His Current and Future Business Prospects, Presented A Threat of Continued Racketeering Activity Extending Indefinitely into the Future — Lawsuit’s “Fortuitous Interruption” of Scheme ≠ Lack of Threat of Continuing Racketeering Activity — Acts of Concealment Used to Perpetuate Violations — Multiple Schemes Not Required — Jury Could Judge Defendant’s Credibility in Assessing Threat of Continuing Criminal Activity — (2) RICO Conspiracy — Two Methods of Proof: Agreement to Overall Objective Or to Commit Predicate Acts — Agreement Can Be Inferred from Conduct — Conspirator Needn’t Know All Details, Have Contact with Other Conspirators Or Participate in Every Stage

Experts: “Normally, Courts Are Loath to Outright Dismiss An Expert” (Good Quote) — Experts Are Unhelpful If They Misstate the Law [Note Premise That Testimony on Law Not Precluded Outright] — Rule 37 Sanctions Unwarranted for Unjustifiable Failure to Produce Relevant Document Already in Requester’s Possession

FRAP 38 Sanctions: (1) Pressing Objectively Frivolous Arguments, Multiple Misstatements at Oral Argument and Failure to Address What District Judge Said Warrant Award against Appellants’ Counsel (Only) — (2) “General Award” of $5,000 Warranted Where Appellee Failed to Sufficiently Document Its Fees and Expenses [Goodyear v. Haegar Issue]]

RICO: Capital Call Investment Process Increasing Equity of Those Responding to Call at Expense of Those Not Responding ≠ Collection of An Unlawful Debt

RICO [And Constitutional] Standing: Concrete Injury Requirement Not Satisfied by Alleged Intangible Injuries of Intrusion Upon Seclusion, Confusion And Emotional Distress, Public Disclosure of Private Facts, Deterred Speech On Nondefamatory Matters, Violation Of First Amendment Rights, And Compulsion

Rule 37(b) Sanctions: Striking of Answer, Default Judgment, Civil Contempt and Piercing Corporate Veil for Deliberate Disregard of Multiple Orders to Produce — Finding of Deliberate Disregard of Court Order Is Factual, Triggering Clear Error Review — Discretion Narrows When Default Sanction Involved — Fourth Circuit Factors for Rule 37 Default Sanction Are Different Than Those for Inherent Power Dismissal Sanction — Continued Defiance of Court Orders And Millions in Unpaid Judgments And Tax Liens Render Lesser Sanctions Futile

RICO: No Causation for Company Harmed by Governmental Customers Shunning It After Employee Publishes Book Admitting He Bribed Governmental Officials — Harm Too Indirect, Not from Bribery (Predicate Act) But from Customers’ Decisions to Shun and Publication of Book (Both Lawful) — Customers Injured by Bribery of Their Officials Are More Direct Plaintiffs

FRAP 38 Sanctions for Frivolous Opposition to Arbitration

Extrinsic Fraud Exception to Rooker-Feldman — Where Defendants’ Perjury, False Evidence, Flawed Legal Arguments Prevented Plaintiffs from Presenting Their Claim in State Court

Federal Jurisdiction: Party Can Waive Subject Matter Jurisdiction — While Federal Courts Must Ensure They Do Not Lack Subject Matter Jurisdiction, There Is No Duty to Find and Exercise It

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2025 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice