New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Not All Inherent Power Sanctions Require Bad Faith (8th Cir.) — Sanctions Denied under Rule 11, 1927 & Inherent Power Where Some Claims Survived 12(c) and Summary Judgment Motions

Duranseau v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 644 F. App'x 702 (8th Cir. 2016): Harvey Duranseau sued Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (PRA), alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq., and Minnesota law. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on, amo ...
Duranseau v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 644 F. App'x 702 (8th Cir. 2016): Harvey Duranseau sued Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (PRA), alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq., and Minnesota law.…
Continue Reading

Who Bears the Burden of Proof on a Motion to Enforce a Contractual Waiver of the Right to a Jury Trial? — Circuit Split

Regions Comm'l Equip. Fin., LLC v. Performance Aviation, LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154782 (S.D. Miss. Nov. 8, 2016): "[A]s the right of jury trial is fundamental, courts indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver." Aetna Ins. Co. v. Kennedy, 301 U.S. 389, 393, 57 S. Ct. 809, 81 L. Ed. 1177 ...
Regions Comm'l Equip. Fin., LLC v. Performance Aviation, LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154782 (S.D. Miss. Nov. 8, 2016): "[A]s the right of jury trial is fundamental, courts indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver." Aetna Ins. Co. v. Kennedy, 301…
Continue Reading

Is a Venue Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 Permitted for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or Only for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction? — Circuit Split — Factors Governing Transfer under § 1631

Companion Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. U.S. Bank N.A., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158389 (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2016): 17   In response to the motion to dismiss his fourth-party complaint, Burns requests, in the event the court concludes that it lacks personal jurisdiction over USBT, that the court transfer the action to the U.S. District Court fo ...
Companion Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. U.S. Bank N.A., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158389 (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2016): 17   In response to the motion to dismiss his fourth-party complaint, Burns requests, in the event the court concludes that it…
Continue Reading

Rule 37(b) Sanctions Not Imposable in Absence of Court Order That Was Violated

Williams v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9070 (11th Cir. May 18, 2016): Orlando Williams, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendants in his employment discrimination and retaliation suit. In his second a ...
Williams v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9070 (11th Cir. May 18, 2016): Orlando Williams, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law in favor of the …
Continue Reading

RICO: § 1964(c), Like Most Statutes, Doesn’t Create Private Contractual Right against Government (It’s Not an “Offer” a Plaintiff Can “Accept” by Filing Suit, Such That Dismissal = Breach) — Dismissal of RICO Claim ≠ Taking

Julian v. United States, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14233 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2016): Plaintiffs Christopher B. Julian and Renee G. Julian filed suit in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging that the government breached an implied contract and/or violated the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause when the United States Dis ...
Julian v. United States, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14233 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2016): Plaintiffs Christopher B. Julian and Renee G. Julian filed suit in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging that the government breached an implied contract …
Continue Reading

Emails Produced by Entity and Bearing Its Bates Numbers Are Authentic When Offered by Opponent — Emails That Could Be Rendered Admissible at Trial OK on Summary Judgment Per Rule 56(c)(2) — Emails as Admissions of Party Opponent, Business Records

Musket Corp. v. Suncor Energy (USA) Mktg., Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157664 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2016): Pending before the court are (1) plaintiff Musket Corporation's ("Musket") objections to and motion to strike defendant Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Marketing, Inc.'s ("Suncor") summary judgment evidence (Dkt. ...
Musket Corp. v. Suncor Energy (USA) Mktg., Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157664 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2016): Pending before the court are (1) plaintiff Musket Corporation's ("Musket") objections to and motion to strike defendant Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Marketing, Inc.'s…
Continue Reading

Is Prudential Standing Jurisdictional and Immune from Waiver? — Circuit Split — Can Prudential Standing Be Divorced from Constitutional Standing & Assessed As a Non-Jurisdictional Issue Under Rule 12(b)(6)? (Raised but Undecided)

Martinez v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20219 (3d Cir. Nov. 9, 2016): Appellant Gelver Martinez appeals from orders of the District Court dismissing his complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We will affirm. I. This case concerns [*2]  a mortgage on real property in Passaic, N ...
Martinez v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20219 (3d Cir. Nov. 9, 2016): Appellant Gelver Martinez appeals from orders of the District Court dismissing his complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We will affirm. I. This…
Continue Reading

Inherent Power — Bankruptcy Court Has Inherent Power to Sanction Litigation Abuse & Broad Equitable Powers under § 105 But Cannot Deny a Statutory Exemption Based on Debtor’s Bad Faith Conduct

Clabaugh v. Grant (In re Grant), 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17139 (10th Cir. Sept. 20, 2016): *   After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties' request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th C ...
Clabaugh v. Grant (In re Grant), 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17139 (10th Cir. Sept. 20, 2016): *   After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties' request for a decision on the briefs…
Continue Reading

Grable Jurisdiction: Reliance on FAA Regs in Negligent Aircrash Case Insufficient — Removal: Only Complete Preemption Is a Ground for Removal, Not Ordinary Preemption — 3 Types of Ordinary Preemption

Bagley v. Teirstein, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138601 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2016): The matter before the Court is t ...
Bagley v. Teirstein, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138601 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2016): The matter before the Court is the motion to remand (ECF No. 18) filed by Plaintiff James Bagley. I. Background On September 15, 2015, Plaintiff James Bagley …
Continue Reading

Voicemail Authentication — Recipient Recorded VMs on Cassette Tape Recorder & Testifies They Were Not Altered Before Recording Made & Content Is Same As He Heard When Listening to VMs Originally — Multipart 3d Cir. Authentication Test (Criminal Cases)

United States v. Credico, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157640 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2016): Defendant Justin Michael Credico is charged with making threats to law enforcement officers and their families in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 115(a)(1)(A) and (B). On October 26, 2016, at Defendant's request, the Court reopened a hearing pursuant to < ...
United States v. Credico, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157640 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2016): Defendant Justin Michael Credico is charged with making threats to law enforcement officers and their families in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 115(a)(1)(A) and (B). On…
Continue Reading
Previous147148149150151152153Next

Recent Posts

RICO and Injunctions: (1) State Court Actions Designed to Perpetuate and Monetize a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable under RICO, Even Though They Are Not Themselves Alleged to Be Predicate Acts [Note: Noerr Pennington Applies in RICO Actions] — (2) Although Civil RICO’s Text and Legislative History Fail to Reveal Any Intent to Override the Provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act, Arbitrations Are Enjoinable Under the “Effective Vindication” Doctrine Where They Operate As a Prospective Waiver of a Party’s Right to Pursue Statutory RICO Remedies — (3) Arbitration Findings May Be Given Collateral Estoppel Effect in a Civil RICO Action — (4) Injunction of Non-Corrupt State Court Litigations That Furthers a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable Under the Anti-Injunction Act’s “Expressly Authorized” Exception — (5) “The Irreparable Harm Requirement Is The Single Most Important Prerequisite For The Issuance Of A Preliminary Injunction” (Good Quote) — (6) When Injunction Is Based on “Serious Questions on the Merits” Rather Than “Likelihood of Success,” Court May Rely on Unverified Pleadings and Attached Exhibits to Assess the Merits, Unless the Opponent Has Raised Substantial Questions (Here, the Opponent Failed to Request an Evidentiary Hearing) — (7) Whether Amended Pleading Moots An Appeal Turns on Whether It Materially Changes the Substantive Basis for the Appeal — (8) Meaning of “In That” (“Used To Introduce A Statement That Explains Or Gives More Specific Information” About A Prior Statement)

RICO: Fraudulent Concealment Must Prevent Discovery of the Injury to Toll Statute of Limitations

Rule 37 Default Judgment Sanction: (1) Abuse of Discretion Review = Legal Conclusions De Novo. Factual Findings for Clear Error — (2) Client May Be Sanctioned for Misconduct of Its Counsel, Though Here Client Was Directly Involved in Bad Faith Misbehavior — (3) Is There A Difference, Under Rule 11 As Opposed to Rule 37, Concerning Whether A Client Can Be Sanctioned for Its Counsel’s Misconduct? — (4) While Sanctions of Last Resort (Dismissal/Default) Are Apt Only If Lesser Sanctions Wouldn’t Ensure Compliance, Rule 37 Doesn’t Require the Vain Gesture of First Imposing Lessert Sanctions When It Is Clear They Would be Ineffective — (5) Court’s Reconsideration of Non-Final Orders Is Governed by Rule 54(b), And Court’s Discretion under That Rule Is Governed by the Law-of-the-Case-Doctrine

RICO: (1) Special Pleading Requirements? — (2) Although Enterprise Must Be More Than a Summation of the Predicate Acts, The Predicate Acts Can Demonstrate the Existence of the Enterprise — (3) Requirement That Association-in-Fact Exist For Purposes Other Than Just to Commit Predicate Acts Merely Requires Continuity — (4) To State an Association-in-Fact Enterprise Consisting of One Natural Person and Collection of Legal Fictions Requires Factual Detail As to How They Acted Together — (5) “A § 1962(c) Enterprise Must Be More Than An Association of Individuals Or Entities Conducting the Normal Affairs of a Defendant Corporation” (Good Quote)

RICO: (1) Fee Award May Exceed Amount Recovered — Strict Proportionality Not Required — (2) Nonmonetary Benefits and Injunctive Relief Recovered Also Relevant Factors — (3) Loss on Some Claims Need Not Result in Lowered Fees, Especially When Both Arise Out of The Same Nucleus of Operative Facts

RICO: Indirect Purchasers (Car Buyers/Renters) Lack Standing to Sue Manufacturers for RICO Violations Even Though Intermediaries (Auto Dealer Direct Purchasers) Lack Any Damages

RICO: Statutory Requirement that RICO Be Liberally Construed Does Not Establish a More Liberal Pleading Standard for RICO Claims — “To Be Sure, Adequately Pleading a RICO Claim Can Be Challenging” (Good Quote) — Court May Dismiss Action Pursuant to Rule 41(b) Absent A Motion

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice