New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Does Federal or State Law Govern Waiver of Arbitration or Forum Selection Clause? (Uncertain) — Test for Waiver — Fed Law Governs Enforceability, State/Chosen Law Interpretation — Error to Deny Timely 1st Motion to Amend Not Shown to Be Moot

SGIC Strategic Global Inv. Capital, Inc. v. Burger King Europe GMBH, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18304 (5th Cir. Oct. 10, 2016): This case arises from a series of disputes over Burger King franchises located in Germany. The district court granted Defendant-Appellee's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs-Appellants' claims on grounds of forum ...
SGIC Strategic Global Inv. Capital, Inc. v. Burger King Europe GMBH, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18304 (5th Cir. Oct. 10, 2016): This case arises from a series of disputes over Burger King franchises located in Germany. The district court granted…
Continue Reading

Text/Email Evidence — Only Outgoing Messages from Party’s Phone Are Admissions — Incoming Are Hearsay [and Must Fall within an Exception or Be Offered for a Non-Hearsay Purpose]

Glispie v. State, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 736 (Ga. S.Ct. Nov. 7, 2016): In Glispie v. State, 335 Ga. App. 177 (779 SE2d 767) (2015), the Court of Appeals affirmed Jaylend Glispie's convictions for violation of the Georgia Controlled Substance Act and certain driving offenses. We granted certiorari to consider the following two que ...
Glispie v. State, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 736 (Ga. S.Ct. Nov. 7, 2016): In Glispie v. State, 335 Ga. App. 177 (779 SE2d 767) (2015), the Court of Appeals affirmed Jaylend Glispie's convictions for violation of the Georgia Controlled Substance Act…
Continue Reading

Spoliation — No Adverse Inference If No Causation Because Pertinent Claims Dismissed for Reasons Adverse Inference Wouldn’t Address or Cure

Lopez v. City of West Miami, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18582 (11th Cir. Oct. 17, 2016): Myrna Lopez appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the City of West Miami, on her claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2611, et seq., as well as the district court' ...
Lopez v. City of West Miami, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18582 (11th Cir. Oct. 17, 2016): Myrna Lopez appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the City of West Miami, on her claims…
Continue Reading

Removal — Diversity Jurisdiction — In Declaratory & Injunctive Actions, the Amount in Controversy = Value of the Object of the Litigation — Is Injunctive Relief Measured from Perspective of Plaintiff or Defendant? — Circuit Split

Poplar Avalon, LLC v. Sprintcom, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86497 (W.D. Tenn. July 5, 2016): Before the Court is Plaintiff Poplar Avalon, LLC's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) filed on June 14, 2016. Defendant Sprintcom, Inc. has responded in opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Remand is DENIED
Poplar Avalon, LLC v. Sprintcom, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86497 (W.D. Tenn. July 5, 2016): Before the Court is Plaintiff Poplar Avalon, LLC's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) filed on June 14, 2016. Defendant Sprintcom, Inc. has responded…
Continue Reading

FRAP 38 and § 1927 Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed on Appellant Raising Issue of First Impression — It Is Not Multiplicitous to Raise A Single, Narrow Issue on Appeal

Suazo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575 (11th Cir. May 10, 2016): In this appeal, we address a question of first impression in the Circuit: whether a cruise ship employee who is injured on the job, and whose employment contract contains an arbitration agreement governed by the New York Convention and Chapter 2 ...
Suazo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575 (11th Cir. May 10, 2016): In this appeal, we address a question of first impression in the Circuit: whether a cruise ship employee who is injured on the job, and …
Continue Reading

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence — State Agency Administrative Directive As Appearing on Agency Website

Chambers v. Johnpierre, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135140 (D. Conn. Sept. 30, 2016): An inmate at a Connecticut Department of Correction facility who wishes to file a grievance must follow the procedure established in Connecticut Department of Correction Administrative Directive 9.6 ("Directive"). See Administrat ...
Chambers v. Johnpierre, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135140 (D. Conn. Sept. 30, 2016): An inmate at a Connecticut Department of Correction facility who wishes to file a grievance must follow the procedure established in Connecticut Department of Correction Administrative Directive …
Continue Reading

RICO Personal Jurisdiction — Does § 1965 Provide Nationwide Jurisdiction or Only Nationwide Service? — Circuit Split — Issue: Must Plaintiff 1st Establish Personal Jurisdiction Over 1 Defendant before Court May Exercise Jurisdiction Over Nonresiden

Domain Protection LLC v. Keating, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135093 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2016): Before the court are Defendant Paul Keating's Renewed Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9), filed September 2, 2015; and Plaintiff Domain Protection's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 23), filed April 18, 2016. After carefully considering the moti ...
Domain Protection LLC v. Keating, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135093 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2016): Before the court are Defendant Paul Keating's Renewed Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9), filed September 2, 2015; and Plaintiff Domain Protection's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc.…
Continue Reading

Social Media Evidence — Pick Your User Name At Your Peril: Facebook User Name Admitted Over Objection That It Constituted Inadmissible Character Evidence

Commonwealth v. Clancy, 2017 Pa. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 673 (Pa. Super. Ct. Feb. 22, 2017): Appellant, Javonn Eric Clancy, appeals from the order entered in the Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his first petition brought pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA").1 We affirm. *** ...
Commonwealth v. Clancy, 2017 Pa. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 673 (Pa. Super. Ct. Feb. 22, 2017): Appellant, Javonn Eric Clancy, appeals from the order entered in the Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his first petition brought pursuant to…
Continue Reading

Sanctions — Spoliation — While District Court Is Generally Required to Give Reasons for Denying Sanctions, It Need Not Belabor the Obvious (Good Quote)

Saldivar v. Austin Independent School Dist., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 23389 (5th Cir. Dec. 29, 2016): PER CURIAM:* *   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in $W5t ...
Saldivar v. Austin Independent School Dist., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 23389 (5th Cir. Dec. 29, 2016): PER CURIAM:* *   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent…
Continue Reading

Appeals — Circuit Won’t Consider Args. Lacking the Reasoning, Authorities Required by FRAP 28(a)(8)(A) — RICO SOL Not Based on Last Predicate Rule — Court Construes Pro Se Filings Liberally But Isn’t Their Advocate (Good Quote)

Armstrong v Wyoming Dept. of Envt’l Quality, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 179 (10th Cir. Jan. 5, 2017): *   After examining Armstrong's brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument wouldn't materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th ...
Armstrong v Wyoming Dept. of Envt’l Quality, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 179 (10th Cir. Jan. 5, 2017): *   After examining Armstrong's brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument wouldn't materially assist in the determination…
Continue Reading
Previous137138139140141142143Next

Recent Posts

RICO and Injunctions: (1) State Court Actions Designed to Perpetuate and Monetize a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable under RICO, Even Though They Are Not Themselves Alleged to Be Predicate Acts [Note: Noerr Pennington Applies in RICO Actions] — (2) Although Civil RICO’s Text and Legislative History Fail to Reveal Any Intent to Override the Provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act, Arbitrations Are Enjoinable Under the “Effective Vindication” Doctrine Where They Operate As a Prospective Waiver of a Party’s Right to Pursue Statutory RICO Remedies — (3) Arbitration Findings May Be Given Collateral Estoppel Effect in a Civil RICO Action — (4) Injunction of Non-Corrupt State Court Litigations That Furthers a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable Under the Anti-Injunction Act’s “Expressly Authorized” Exception — (5) “The Irreparable Harm Requirement Is The Single Most Important Prerequisite For The Issuance Of A Preliminary Injunction” (Good Quote) — (6) When Injunction Is Based on “Serious Questions on the Merits” Rather Than “Likelihood of Success,” Court May Rely on Unverified Pleadings and Attached Exhibits to Assess the Merits, Unless the Opponent Has Raised Substantial Questions (Here, the Opponent Failed to Request an Evidentiary Hearing) — (7) Whether Amended Pleading Moots An Appeal Turns on Whether It Materially Changes the Substantive Basis for the Appeal — (8) Meaning of “In That” (“Used To Introduce A Statement That Explains Or Gives More Specific Information” About A Prior Statement)

RICO: Fraudulent Concealment Must Prevent Discovery of the Injury to Toll Statute of Limitations

Rule 37 Default Judgment Sanction: (1) Abuse of Discretion Review = Legal Conclusions De Novo. Factual Findings for Clear Error — (2) Client May Be Sanctioned for Misconduct of Its Counsel, Though Here Client Was Directly Involved in Bad Faith Misbehavior — (3) Is There A Difference, Under Rule 11 As Opposed to Rule 37, Concerning Whether A Client Can Be Sanctioned for Its Counsel’s Misconduct? — (4) While Sanctions of Last Resort (Dismissal/Default) Are Apt Only If Lesser Sanctions Wouldn’t Ensure Compliance, Rule 37 Doesn’t Require the Vain Gesture of First Imposing Lessert Sanctions When It Is Clear They Would be Ineffective — (5) Court’s Reconsideration of Non-Final Orders Is Governed by Rule 54(b), And Court’s Discretion under That Rule Is Governed by the Law-of-the-Case-Doctrine

RICO: (1) Special Pleading Requirements? — (2) Although Enterprise Must Be More Than a Summation of the Predicate Acts, The Predicate Acts Can Demonstrate the Existence of the Enterprise — (3) Requirement That Association-in-Fact Exist For Purposes Other Than Just to Commit Predicate Acts Merely Requires Continuity — (4) To State an Association-in-Fact Enterprise Consisting of One Natural Person and Collection of Legal Fictions Requires Factual Detail As to How They Acted Together — (5) “A § 1962(c) Enterprise Must Be More Than An Association of Individuals Or Entities Conducting the Normal Affairs of a Defendant Corporation” (Good Quote)

RICO: (1) Fee Award May Exceed Amount Recovered — Strict Proportionality Not Required — (2) Nonmonetary Benefits and Injunctive Relief Recovered Also Relevant Factors — (3) Loss on Some Claims Need Not Result in Lowered Fees, Especially When Both Arise Out of The Same Nucleus of Operative Facts

RICO: Indirect Purchasers (Car Buyers/Renters) Lack Standing to Sue Manufacturers for RICO Violations Even Though Intermediaries (Auto Dealer Direct Purchasers) Lack Any Damages

RICO: Statutory Requirement that RICO Be Liberally Construed Does Not Establish a More Liberal Pleading Standard for RICO Claims — “To Be Sure, Adequately Pleading a RICO Claim Can Be Challenging” (Good Quote) — Court May Dismiss Action Pursuant to Rule 41(b) Absent A Motion

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice