New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Removal: Given That District Court May Not Sua Sponte Remand for a Procedural Defect, Is Removal by a Forum Defendant Procedural or Jurisdictional? — Circuit Split — Domicile, Not Residence, Determines Citizenship for Diversity Purposes

Martin v. Phillips, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37792 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 16, 2017): ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and therefore have an obligation to inquire into their subject matter jurisdiction. See Kirkland v. Midland Mo ...
Martin v. Phillips, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37792 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 16, 2017): ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and therefore have an obligation to inquire into their subject matter…
Continue Reading

Who Bears the Burden of Proof as to Service When It Is Challenged after a Default Judgment Has Been Entered? — Circuit Split

McGehee v. Diversified Global Servs., LLC, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38810 (D. Tenn. Mar. 17, 2017) (R&R): Authority is split as to who bears the burden of proof when service is challenged after default judgment has been entered. It is well-settled that the plaintiff bears the burden to establish that service [*9] ...
McGehee v. Diversified Global Servs., LLC, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38810 (D. Tenn. Mar. 17, 2017) (R&R): Authority is split as to who bears the burden of proof when service is challenged after default judgment has been entered. It is…
Continue Reading

Sanctions: Due Process Satisfied If Court Exercises Personal Jurisdiction over Individual Who Is Alter Ego of Entity over Which Court Has Jurisdiction — Appeals: Contentions Not Raised in Argument Section of Opening Brief Waived

Aldmyr Sys., Inc. v. Friedman, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2338 (4th Cir. Feb. 9, 2017): PER CURIAM: Aldmyr Systems, Inc., and Zegato Solutions, Inc. (collectively "Appellants"), appeal the district court's dismissal of their complaint and the court's determination that sanctions were warranted against Appellants, th ...
Aldmyr Sys., Inc. v. Friedman, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2338 (4th Cir. Feb. 9, 2017): PER CURIAM: Aldmyr Systems, Inc., and Zegato Solutions, Inc. (collectively "Appellants"), appeal the district court's dismissal of their complaint and the court's determination that sanctions…
Continue Reading

RICO Conspiracy: Neither Suspicions about Nor Investigation into Miscreant’s Conduct = Conspiracy, Which Requires More Than Knowledge & Presence — Pleading: Importance of Including a General Denial in Answer (Good Language to Quote)

Aguilar v. PNC Bank, N.A., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2150 (8th Cir. Feb. 7, 2017): Ninety-two plaintiffs1 filed suit against PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC), alleging, among other things, (1) violations of Missouri's Uniform Fiduciaries Law (UFL); (2) aiding and abetting the breach of ...
Aguilar v. PNC Bank, N.A., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2150 (8th Cir. Feb. 7, 2017): Ninety-two plaintiffs1 filed suit against PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC), alleging, among other things, (1) violations of Missouri's Uniform Fiduciaries Law (UFL); (2) aiding and…
Continue Reading

Internet Evidence — Municipal Government Program Accessed via Wayback Machine — Implicit Judicial Notice of Program’s Self-Description on Its Website as of 2011

Ferone v. Colvin, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181826 (S.D.N.Y. June 17, 2016) (R&R): I. Introduction   Plaintiff, Nanette L. Ferone, brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a fina ...
Ferone v. Colvin, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181826 (S.D.N.Y. June 17, 2016) (R&R): I. Introduction   Plaintiff, Nanette L. Ferone, brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review …
Continue Reading

Evidence-Summarizing Charts under Fed. R. Evid. 1006 — Non-Voluminous Information (Texts) May Be Deemed Voluminous When It Cannot Conveniently Be Examined in Court and Is Pulled from Vast Fields of Information

Osborne, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 59 (11th Cir. Jan. 4, 2017):  PER CURIAM: Appellant Damien Bernard Osborne challenges his conviction for armed bank robbery, following a three-day jury trial. He raises arguments that the district court improperly admitted two categories of evidence: (1) text messages between a cell-phone number attributed ...
Osborne, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 59 (11th Cir. Jan. 4, 2017):  PER CURIAM: Appellant Damien Bernard Osborne challenges his conviction for armed bank robbery, following a three-day jury trial. He raises arguments that the district court improperly admitted two categories…
Continue Reading

Sua Sponte Rule 11 Sanctions — More Exacting Abuse of Discretion Review — Akin-to-Contempt Standard (2d Circuit) — Deception of the Court by Omission

Revellino & Byczek, LLP v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4508 (2d Cir. Mar. 15 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the district court is AFFIRMED. Appellants Anthony Mahoney and the law ...
Revellino & Byczek, LLP v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4508 (2d Cir. Mar. 15 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the district court…
Continue Reading

RICO: Non-Specific Allegations of Relationship and Continuity Fail to Plausibly Allege Pattern — No Conspiracy If No Substantive Violation — Diversity: No Right to Have Jury Determine Domicile

Yagman v. Gabbert, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5019 (9th Cir. Mar. 21, 2017): *   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Plaintiff-Appellant Stephen Yagman appeals the district court's dismissal of his Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ...
Yagman v. Gabbert, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5019 (9th Cir. Mar. 21, 2017): *   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Plaintiff-Appellant Stephen Yagman appeals the district court's…
Continue Reading

Blog Admissibility: Comments Section of Blog and Other Statements Made on Internet Introduced by Third Party Are Inadmissible for Their Truth

Gibson v. Swingle, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1337 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2017): Richard Gibson, an attorney, filed this action alleging Justin Swingle invaded his privacy and defamed him in Internet posts. The trial court granted summary judgment to Gibson and issued a permanent injunction enjoining Swingle from posting an ...
Gibson v. Swingle, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1337 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2017): Richard Gibson, an attorney, filed this action alleging Justin Swingle invaded his privacy and defamed him in Internet posts. The trial court granted summary judgment …
Continue Reading

Spoliation — No Adverse Inference Instruction for Video Recorded over in Ordinary Course of Business Where It Did Not Depict the Relevant Incident and Opponent Failed to Issue a Timely Request for Production [or Preservation] of It (Pre-37(e))

Parrish v. Dollar Gen. Corp., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3568 (6th Cir. Feb. 27, 2017): This case involves the review of three decisions by the trial court: a denial of a motion to continue because of alleged nondisclosure of a material witness, a decision not to admonish the jury to disregard statements made by Dollar General's counsel ...
Parrish v. Dollar Gen. Corp., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3568 (6th Cir. Feb. 27, 2017): This case involves the review of three decisions by the trial court: a denial of a motion to continue because of alleged nondisclosure of a…
Continue Reading
Previous134135136137138139140Next

Recent Posts

RICO and Injunctions: (1) State Court Actions Designed to Perpetuate and Monetize a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable under RICO, Even Though They Are Not Themselves Alleged to Be Predicate Acts [Note: Noerr Pennington Applies in RICO Actions] — (2) Although Civil RICO’s Text and Legislative History Fail to Reveal Any Intent to Override the Provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act, Arbitrations Are Enjoinable Under the “Effective Vindication” Doctrine Where They Operate As a Prospective Waiver of a Party’s Right to Pursue Statutory RICO Remedies — (3) Arbitration Findings May Be Given Collateral Estoppel Effect in a Civil RICO Action — (4) Injunction of Non-Corrupt State Court Litigations That Furthers a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable Under the Anti-Injunction Act’s “Expressly Authorized” Exception — (5) “The Irreparable Harm Requirement Is The Single Most Important Prerequisite For The Issuance Of A Preliminary Injunction” (Good Quote) — (6) When Injunction Is Based on “Serious Questions on the Merits” Rather Than “Likelihood of Success,” Court May Rely on Unverified Pleadings and Attached Exhibits to Assess the Merits, Unless the Opponent Has Raised Substantial Questions (Here, the Opponent Failed to Request an Evidentiary Hearing) — (7) Whether Amended Pleading Moots An Appeal Turns on Whether It Materially Changes the Substantive Basis for the Appeal — (8) Meaning of “In That” (“Used To Introduce A Statement That Explains Or Gives More Specific Information” About A Prior Statement)

RICO: Fraudulent Concealment Must Prevent Discovery of the Injury to Toll Statute of Limitations

Rule 37 Default Judgment Sanction: (1) Abuse of Discretion Review = Legal Conclusions De Novo. Factual Findings for Clear Error — (2) Client May Be Sanctioned for Misconduct of Its Counsel, Though Here Client Was Directly Involved in Bad Faith Misbehavior — (3) Is There A Difference, Under Rule 11 As Opposed to Rule 37, Concerning Whether A Client Can Be Sanctioned for Its Counsel’s Misconduct? — (4) While Sanctions of Last Resort (Dismissal/Default) Are Apt Only If Lesser Sanctions Wouldn’t Ensure Compliance, Rule 37 Doesn’t Require the Vain Gesture of First Imposing Lessert Sanctions When It Is Clear They Would be Ineffective — (5) Court’s Reconsideration of Non-Final Orders Is Governed by Rule 54(b), And Court’s Discretion under That Rule Is Governed by the Law-of-the-Case-Doctrine

RICO: (1) Special Pleading Requirements? — (2) Although Enterprise Must Be More Than a Summation of the Predicate Acts, The Predicate Acts Can Demonstrate the Existence of the Enterprise — (3) Requirement That Association-in-Fact Exist For Purposes Other Than Just to Commit Predicate Acts Merely Requires Continuity — (4) To State an Association-in-Fact Enterprise Consisting of One Natural Person and Collection of Legal Fictions Requires Factual Detail As to How They Acted Together — (5) “A § 1962(c) Enterprise Must Be More Than An Association of Individuals Or Entities Conducting the Normal Affairs of a Defendant Corporation” (Good Quote)

RICO: (1) Fee Award May Exceed Amount Recovered — Strict Proportionality Not Required — (2) Nonmonetary Benefits and Injunctive Relief Recovered Also Relevant Factors — (3) Loss on Some Claims Need Not Result in Lowered Fees, Especially When Both Arise Out of The Same Nucleus of Operative Facts

RICO: Indirect Purchasers (Car Buyers/Renters) Lack Standing to Sue Manufacturers for RICO Violations Even Though Intermediaries (Auto Dealer Direct Purchasers) Lack Any Damages

RICO: Statutory Requirement that RICO Be Liberally Construed Does Not Establish a More Liberal Pleading Standard for RICO Claims — “To Be Sure, Adequately Pleading a RICO Claim Can Be Challenging” (Good Quote) — Court May Dismiss Action Pursuant to Rule 41(b) Absent A Motion

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice