New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Supreme Court: Hague Convention on Service Abroad Permits Service by Mail If the Destination Country Does Not Object

Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3212 (U.S. May 22, 2017): This case concerns the scope of the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial [*6]  and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters, Nov. 15, 1965 (Hague Service Convention), 20 U. S. T. 361, T. I. A. S. No. 6638. The purpose of that multilateral tr ...
Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3212 (U.S. May 22, 2017): This case concerns the scope of the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial [*6]  and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters, Nov. 15, 1965 (Hague…
Continue Reading

$2.5 Million in Attorney’s Fees Properly Awarded under 35 U.S.C. § 285 Even Though Sanctions Rightly Denied under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Inherent Power

Nova Chemicals Corp. (Canada) v. Dow Chemical Co., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8338 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2017): NOVA Chemicals Corp. (Canada) and NOVA Chemicals Inc. (Delaware) (collectively, "NOVA") appeal the district court's award of approximately $2.5 million in attorney fees to Dow Chemical Co. ("Dow") unde ...
Nova Chemicals Corp. (Canada) v. Dow Chemical Co., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8338 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2017): NOVA Chemicals Corp. (Canada) and NOVA Chemicals Inc. (Delaware) (collectively, "NOVA") appeal the district court's award of approximately $2.5 million in attorney …
Continue Reading

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence — Federal Court May Take Judicial Notice of State Court Dockets and Pleadings Available on the Internet

Hall v. CSP-Los Angeles, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72931 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2017): REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United Stat ...
Hall v. CSP-Los Angeles, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72931 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2017): REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge, pursuant to…
Continue Reading

RICO Statute of Limitations: Injury Occurs When Amount of Damages Is Clear, Definite — Investment Injury for Which Investor Has No Contractual or Legal Remedies Accrues at Time of Investment — Standards for Actual/Inquiry Notice, Equitable Tolling

Rosenshein v. Meshel, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6960 (2d Cir. April 21, 2017): UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment entered on August 29, 2016, is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff Arnold Rosenshein, a real estate investor, sued defendants under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza ...
Rosenshein v. Meshel, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6960 (2d Cir. April 21, 2017): UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment entered on August 29, 2016, is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff Arnold Rosenshein, a real estate investor, …
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions — Vexatious Litigant Injunction — Factors — Apt in “Extraordinary Circumstances,” Even If Other Rules Apply — Repeated Litigation of Same Issues without Any Objective Good Faith Hope of Winning

Armatas v. Maroulleti, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8628 (2d Cir. May 17, 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the orders of the district court are AFFIRMED in part, and the appeal is DISMISSED in p ...
Armatas v. Maroulleti, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8628 (2d Cir. May 17, 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the orders of the district court are AFFIRMED in part, and the appeal is…
Continue Reading

Rule 11 Sanctions: Appellate Jurisdiction — Once All Issues Relating to Order Adjudicated, Premature Notice of Appeal Ripens (All Details of Non-Monetary Sanctions Need Not Be Settled) — Law School Lectures as Sanction

Salmon v Nutra Pharma Corp., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7544 (10th Cir. April 28, 2017): *   After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. ...
Salmon v Nutra Pharma Corp., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7544 (10th Cir. April 28, 2017): *   After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this…
Continue Reading

Supreme Court: Arbitration — Rule That Inhibits Entering Arbitration Agreement (Requires Power of Attorney to Specifically OK Jury Waiver) Violates FAA — Rule “Applicable to Arbitration Agreements and Black Swans” (Good Quotes)

Kindred Nursing Ctrs. LP v. Clark, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2948 (U.S. May 15, 2017): The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA or Act) requires courts to place arbitration agreements [*5]  "on equal footing with all other contracts." DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 577 U. S. ___, ___, 136 S. Ct. 463, 468, 19 ...
Kindred Nursing Ctrs. LP v. Clark, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2948 (U.S. May 15, 2017): The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA or Act) requires courts to place arbitration agreements [*5]  "on equal footing with all other contracts." DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia,…
Continue Reading

Instagram Authentication — Contents, Including Photos with Kids, Sufficient Evidence of Authenticity — Burden on Opponent to Show Hacking — “To Agree Evidence Is Weak Is Not to Agree It Is Speculative or Untenable” (Good Quote)

People v. Taylor, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3247 (Cal. Ct. App. May 12, 2017): Following a joint trial, a jury convicted Ruben Ramon Guajardo, the shooter, and his cousin Gino Wayne Taylor, an aider ...
People v. Taylor, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3247 (Cal. Ct. App. May 12, 2017): Following a joint trial, a jury convicted Ruben Ramon Guajardo, the shooter, and his cousin Gino Wayne Taylor, an aider and abettor, of the first …
Continue Reading

Cumulative Racist Text Messages Excluded under Rule 403 in Employment Discrimination Trial — Attempted Spoliation of Texts Excluded as Irrelevant Where Contents “Repeated for the Jury Ad Nauseam”

Phoenix v. Coatesville Area Sch. Dist., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4871 (3d Cir. Mar. 20, 2017): *   This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. In an employment discrimination action alleging constructive discharge on the basis of race, Jahmal Phoen ...
Phoenix v. Coatesville Area Sch. Dist., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4871 (3d Cir. Mar. 20, 2017): *   This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. In an employment …
Continue Reading

Rule 11, §1927 and Inherent Power Sanctions — Standards — Vexatious Litigant Injunctions Typically Used for Egregious Abuse of the Judicial Process — Mere Lack of Merit Insufficient for Imposition of Sanctions (Good Quotes)

Sorenson v. Wolfson, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4591 (2d Cir. Mar. 16, 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the district court is AFFIRMED. Appellant Stanley Wolfson appeals from the district court ...
Sorenson v. Wolfson, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4591 (2d Cir. Mar. 16, 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the district court is AFFIRMED. Appellant Stanley Wolfson appeals from…
Continue Reading
Previous130131132133134135136Next

Recent Posts

RICO Causation: Parents of Children with Disabilities Deprived In-Person Education and Services during the Pandemic Were Not Causally Injured by Teachers’ False Assurances to Federal Authorities That IDEA-Complaint Policies Were in Place, Which Caused Funds to Issue But Not to the Benefit of the Disabled Children — Damages Too Indirect — Proper Plaintiff Is U.S. Government — Private Injunctive Relief Under RICO Uncertain in Third Circuit

Sanctions: Rule 37(b)(2) Dismissal — Sixth Circuit Factors

Inherent Power Sanctions — Extrajudicial Misconduct: Sanctions Power Extends to Conduct Intended to Sabotage Court’s Ability to Adjudicate the Case Before It, Here, By Commencing State Court Actions Seeking to Enjoin the Federal Plaintiffs from Proceeding with Their Federal Litigation — Sanctions Fee Awards: The Factors Used For Calculating A Fee Award To A Prevailing Party Do Not Govern — Under Goodyear, the Relevant Inquiry Is Whether There Is A Sufficient Causal Link Between The Sanctioned Misconduct And The Fees Awarded

RICO: Members of Association-in-Fact Enterprise Must Act with a Common Purpose—Mere Allegation That Various Defendants Agreed at Different Times to Engage in Various Fraudulent Schemes Does Not Plausibly Support the Essential Inference, That They Acted with s Sufficiently Common Purpose

RICO Causation: (1) State’s Misrepresentation to Federal Government That It Was Providing Plaintiffs with Mandated Special Education Did Not Cause Plaintiffs’ Injury Because The Failure to Provide The Education Was Not Caused by the Fraud on the Federal Government — (2) The Three Factors for Assessing RICO Causation — (3) Limits of the Second Circuit’s Decision in Alix v. McKinsey That Causation Can Be Established Where A Fraud On The Judiciary “Or Other Governmental Entity” Resulted In A Resource Going To Someone Less Deserving

Rule 41(b): Five Factors to Be Weighed in Deciding Whether Dismissal Is Appropriate (Second Circuit) — Is A Finding of Bad Faith or Fault Required if Dismissal Is Without Prejudice? — Undecided If Truly Without Prejudice But It Is Required If the Without Prejudice Dismissal Will Act as a Dismissal on the Merits (Here, Because of the Statute of Limitations) — Failure To Consider A Lesser Sanction Than Dismissal Is Generally An Abuse Of Discretion

Spoliation Sanctions/Mootness: Stipulation Resolving “All Pending Discovery Disputes,” Which Are Enumerated, Does Not Moot Subsequent Sanctions Motion for ESI Spoliation — Postjudgment Sanctions Order Is Appealable When District Court Has Finally Disposed of Both Liability and Amount

Rule 37 Default Judgment Sanction: (1) Default Judgment Appropriate Only As a Last Resort, When Less Drastic Sanctions Would Not Ensure Compliance with the Court’s Orders — (2) Default Judgment Sanction Requires Willful or Bad Faith Failure to Obey Discovery Order — (3) Fugitive Defendant’s Failure to Appear at Court-Ordered, Remote Deposition Despite Court Warning That Sanctions Could Follow Disobedience Warrants Default Judgment — (4) District Court Afforded Wide Discretion in Interpreting Its Own Orders — (5) Filing a Notice of Appeal from a Non-Appealable Order (Here, a Discovery Order) Does Not Deprive the District Court of Jurisdiction over the Case

RICO and Injunctions: (1) State Court Actions Designed to Perpetuate and Monetize a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable under RICO, Even Though They Are Not Themselves Alleged to Be Predicate Acts [Note: Noerr Pennington Applies in RICO Actions] — (2) Although Civil RICO’s Text and Legislative History Fail to Reveal Any Intent to Override the Provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act, Arbitrations Are Enjoinable Under the “Effective Vindication” Doctrine Where They Operate As a Prospective Waiver of a Party’s Right to Pursue Statutory RICO Remedies — (3) Arbitration Findings May Be Given Collateral Estoppel Effect in a Civil RICO Action — (4) Injunction of Non-Corrupt State Court Litigations That Furthers a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable Under the Anti-Injunction Act’s “Expressly Authorized” Exception — (5) “The Irreparable Harm Requirement Is The Single Most Important Prerequisite For The Issuance Of A Preliminary Injunction” (Good Quote) — (6) When Injunction Is Based on “Serious Questions on the Merits” Rather Than “Likelihood of Success,” Court May Rely on Unverified Pleadings and Attached Exhibits to Assess the Merits, Unless the Opponent Has Raised Substantial Questions (Here, the Opponent Failed to Request an Evidentiary Hearing) — (7) Whether Amended Pleading Moots An Appeal Turns on Whether It Materially Changes the Substantive Basis for the Appeal — (8) Meaning of “In That” (“Used To Introduce A Statement That Explains Or Gives More Specific Information” About A Prior Statement)

RICO: Fraudulent Concealment Must Prevent Discovery of the Injury to Toll Statute of Limitations

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice