New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Inherent Power Sanctions: Bad Faith Personal to Offender (Partner v Firm)—Reckless-Plus or Willful Blindness OK—Out-of-State Non-Appearing Lawyer, Non-Lawyer Subject to Jurisdiction—Clear & Convincing Evidence—Standing—What Is Clearly Erroneous

JTR Enters., LLC v. Columbian Emeralds, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11248 (11th Cir. June 23, 2017): JTR Enterprises, LLC ("JTR"), a company run by Jay Miscovich that was ostensibly engaged in treasure hunting, brought an admiralty action in the Southern District Court of Florida seeking title to emeralds that Miscovich and ...
JTR Enters., LLC v. Columbian Emeralds, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11248 (11th Cir. June 23, 2017): JTR Enterprises, LLC ("JTR"), a company run by Jay Miscovich that was ostensibly engaged in treasure hunting, brought an admiralty action in the Southern …
Continue Reading

Email Authentication, Admissibility: 901(a) Satisfied by Showing Email Sent from Secret Account Known Only to Sender/Recipient & Contained Info Only They Knew — Use of Translator ≠ Hearsay Except Rarely (Nonexclusive Factors Given)

United States v. Zhu, 854 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2016): Kaixiang Zhu was convicted by a jury of conspiring to commit immigration fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 371, and aiding and abetting fraud and misuse of immigration documents, see
United States v. Zhu, 854 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2016): Kaixiang Zhu was convicted by a jury of conspiring to commit immigration fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 371, and aiding and abetting fraud and misuse of immigration documents, see 18 …
Continue Reading

Attorney-Client Privilege: Communications between Attorney and 3d Party (Collection Agency) Hired by the Corporate Client Are Privileged Where 3d Party Was Specifically Hired to Find Counsel for Corporation & Is Thus Corporation’s Agent

Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Assocs., PC, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9333 (D.C. Cir. May 30, 2017): In order to pursue a Master's degree in Computer Graphics, Demetra Baylor ("Appellant") took out six student loans. Several years after her graduation, Mitchell Rubenstein & Associates, P.C. ("Appellee") came callin ...
Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Assocs., PC, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9333 (D.C. Cir. May 30, 2017): In order to pursue a Master's degree in Computer Graphics, Demetra Baylor ("Appellant") took out six student loans. Several years after her graduation,…
Continue Reading

Twitter Admissibility — Third Party Tweets May Be Relevant to Show Tweeter’s State of Mind But Exclusion Is Harmless If Tweeter Admits the Equivalent on the Stand

Williams v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 5490 (Tex. Ct. App. June 15, 2017): Appellant Robert Marquis Lamar Williams appeals his conviction for murder2  of his three-year-old daughter, Anastasia. In two points, he contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the convict ...
Williams v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 5490 (Tex. Ct. App. June 15, 2017): Appellant Robert Marquis Lamar Williams appeals his conviction for murder2  of his three-year-old daughter, Anastasia. In two points, he contends that the evidence is insufficient…
Continue Reading

§ 1927 Sanctions OK for Repeatedly Asserting Non-Existent Facts on SJ — Taxing Costs: Video, Steno Records Serve Different Purposes, Both Allowed — Cost of Deps That Would’ve Been Needed If Case Tried OK Though Not Used on Successful SJ Motion

Maiteki v. Marten Transp., Ltd., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5366 (10th Cir. Mar. 28, 2017): *   After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ...
Maiteki v. Marten Transp., Ltd., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5366 (10th Cir. Mar. 28, 2017): *   After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this…
Continue Reading

Disqualification—(1) Order Granting or Denying a Motion to Disqualify Counsel in a Civil Case Is Not Immediately Appealable & (2) Party Lacks Standing to Disqualify Opponent’s Counsel Absent Showing That The Representation Harmed It

Two Decisions, Same Case, Two Years Apart: (1) Schneider v. Cnty. of Will, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 23265 (7th Cir. Jan. 22, 2015): IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Generally, an appeal may not be taken in a civil case until a final judg ...
Two Decisions, Same Case, Two Years Apart: (1) Schneider v. Cnty. of Will, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 23265 (7th Cir. Jan. 22, 2015): IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Generally, an appeal may not…
Continue Reading

YouTube Admissibility — Third Party Statements on Video = Hearsay

Patton v. Warden, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93574 (S.D. Ohio June 19, 2017): REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS This habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the Court for decision on the merits. Upon initial review of the Petition (ECF No. 1), the Court ordered the State to answer the Petition and set a date t ...
Patton v. Warden, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93574 (S.D. Ohio June 19, 2017): REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS This habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the Court for decision on the merits. Upon initial review of the Petition…
Continue Reading

Supreme Court—Specific Jurisdiction: State Court Lacks Personal Jur. over Defendant re Nonresidents’ Claims Identical to Those of Residents’, Absent Connection between Forum & Claims — Must Sue in State with Gen. Jur. or Maybe Federal Court

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3873 (U.S. June 19, 2017): More than 600 plaintiffs, most of whom are not California residents, filed this civil [*6]  action in a California state court against Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS), asserting a variety of state-law claims based on injuries allegedly caused by ...
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3873 (U.S. June 19, 2017): More than 600 plaintiffs, most of whom are not California residents, filed this civil [*6]  action in a California state court against Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS),…
Continue Reading

Blog Admissibility: Third-Party Blog Posts Are Hearsay

Spellman v. Benjamin Moore & Co., 2016 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 18216 (Ct. Com. Pl. Oct. 7, 2016): This appeal follows a jury trial concluded in May of 2016, in which the jury found in favor of Defendant, Benjamin Moore & Co., on Plaintiffs' claims against Benjamin Moore & Co. for alleged fraudulent misrepresentation, ...
Spellman v. Benjamin Moore & Co., 2016 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 18216 (Ct. Com. Pl. Oct. 7, 2016): This appeal follows a jury trial concluded in May of 2016, in which the jury found in favor of Defendant, …
Continue Reading

Spoliation of Tangible Evidence — Bad Faith Still Required for Adverse Inference Instruction in Tenth Circuit

Rife v Okla. Dep’t of Public Safety, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1117 (10th Cir. April 12, 2017) (note: this opinion amends the opinion excerpted in our posting of February 21, 2017): ORDER This matter is before the court on appellees McCurtain County Jail Trust, Chad Dale and Jonathon Will ...
Rife v Okla. Dep’t of Public Safety, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1117 (10th Cir. April 12, 2017) (note: this opinion amends the opinion excerpted in our posting of February 21, 2017): ORDER This matter is before the court…
Continue Reading
Previous125126127128129130131Next

Recent Posts

RICO: Statutory Requirement that RICO Be Liberally Construed Does Not Establish a More Liberal Pleading Standard for RICO Claims — “To Be Sure, Adequately Pleading a RICO Claim Can Be Challenging” (Good Quote) — Court May Dismiss Action Pursuant to Rule 41(b) Absent A Motion

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

There Is No Good-Faith Defense For Issuing An Overly Burdensome Subpoena

Purposes of Rule 37 and Section 1927 Sanctions

While Rule 11 Doesn’t Apply to Appellate Proceedings (Unless It Has Been Incorporated in Local Appellate Rules), Rule 11 Caselaw Is Looked to for Guidance in Interpreting Applicable Sanctions Powers on Appeal

Rule 11 Sanctions & Appellate Review: Abuse of Discretion Standard Applies Unless Sanctions Are Based Solely (Not Just in Part) on Legal Issues, in Which Case Review Is De Novo

Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions for Altering Expert’s 26(a)(2)(B) Report — Without the Expert’s Knowledge or Approval — by Converting It from PDF to Word, Changing Headings and Other Formatting, and Omitting a Page of Relevant Text and Appendices, Even Though Expert Testified That The Overall Substance of the Report Was Unchanged — Rule 37(b)(2)(A) Sanctions May Be Reversed If Failure to Comply with Discovery Order Was Due to Misunderstanding or Inability to Comply

Spoliation: Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) Imposes a Higher Standard — Intent — Than Fourth Circuit Law Previously Applied to Spoliation of Electronically-Stored Information (And Still Does As to Non-ESI) — Willfulness vs. Intent

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice