New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Complex Lit Blog

Rule 41(b) Sanctions: Dismissal for Single Failure to Attend Pretrial Conference Reversed — Pattern of Contumacious Conduct, Consideration of Lesser Sanctions, Warning Or, At Least<A Record Showing Relevant Factors Weight Required

Vivaldi Servicios de Seguridad, Inc. v. Maiso Grp., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 3461, 2024 WL 615605 (1st Cir. Feb. 14, 2024): *1 May a district court dismiss a case for counsel’s unexcused failure to appear at the final pretrial confer ...
Vivaldi Servicios de Seguridad, Inc. v. Maiso Grp., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 3461, 2024 WL 615605 (1st Cir. Feb. 14, 2024): *1 May a district court dismiss a case for counsel’s unexcused failure to appear at the final pretrial…
Continue Reading

Pro Se Litigant Sanctioned $10,000 For Filing Brief (Prepared by a “Consultant”) Containing AI-Generated Fictitious Cases

Kruse v. Karlen, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 62 (Mo. Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2024): Opinion Introduction Jonathan R. Karlen ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's grant of final summary judgment to Molly Kruse ("Respon ...
Kruse v. Karlen, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 62 (Mo. Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2024): Opinion Introduction Jonathan R. Karlen (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of final summary judgment to Molly Kruse (“Respondent”). Due to numerous fatal briefing deficiencies…
Continue Reading

Arbitration: Whether Allegedly Non-Party Parent Corp. Compelled to Arbitrate Must Be Tried to Resolve Fact Issues Over Nomenclature And “Implicitly Agreed To Be Mutually Bound” By Arbitration Clause

James v. RPS Holdings, LLC, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1283 Opinion   PER CURIAM: The issue in this case arises from a motion to compel arbitration in a putative class action. We consider whether there was a gen ...
James v. RPS Holdings, LLC, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1283 Opinion   PER CURIAM: The issue in this case arises from a motion to compel arbitration in a putative class action. We consider whether there was a genuine issue of…
Continue Reading

Experts: Opinion Based on Specified Literature Properly Excluded As Irrelevant After District Judge Read The Literature And Correctly Concluded It Did Not Say What The Expert Claimed — Correlation Is Not Causation

Md. Shall Issue, Inc. v. Anne Arundel Cnty., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1499 (4th Cir. Jan. 23, 2024) Deaths by suicide have increased nationally over recent years, and now roughly 48,000 people die annually from suicide. And over 50% of those suicides w ...
Md. Shall Issue, Inc. v. Anne Arundel Cnty., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1499 (4th Cir. Jan. 23, 2024) Deaths by suicide have increased nationally over recent years, and now roughly 48,000 people die annually from suicide. And over 50% of…
Continue Reading

ChatGBT Evidence Excluded As “Notorious for Inventing False Information About Market Rates”

M.B. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13836 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2024) (R&R) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge. TO THE HONORABLE J ...
M.B. v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13836 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2024) (R&R) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge. TO THE HONORABLE JOHN P. CRONAN: On behalf of her son K.B., M.B.…
Continue Reading

Federal Post-Judgment Interest Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(4), Applies to Adversary Proceedings in Bankruptcy, Unless a More Particular Provision of the Bankruptcy Code Dictates A Different Result (Issue of First Impression in Fifth Circuit)

Carmichael v. Balke (In re Imperial Petro. Recovery Corp.), 84 F.4th 264 (5th Cir. 2023): [*268]  Per Curiam: This appeal arises from an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. ...
Carmichael v. Balke (In re Imperial Petro. Recovery Corp.), 84 F.4th 264 (5th Cir. 2023): [*268]  Per Curiam: This appeal arises from an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. I. This litigation stems…
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions — Dismissal with Prejudice Appropriate for Threats of Violence Or Other Insubordination That Disables The Judiciary From Functioning

Freeman v. Anderson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 31213 (7th Cir. Nov.  22, 2023) (unpublished): ORDER Dismissal of a lawsuit, although a severe sanction, is sometimes warranted. The district court properly dismissed this suit file ...
Freeman v. Anderson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 31213 (7th Cir. Nov.  22, 2023) (unpublished): ORDER Dismissal of a lawsuit, although a severe sanction, is sometimes warranted. The district court properly dismissed this suit filed by Sovereignty Joeseph Helmueller Sovereign Freeman…
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions Appropriate to Punish Violation of Vexatious Litigant Injunction

Johnson v. Taco Bell Corp., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 31370 (6th Cir. Nov. 27, 2023): ORDER Alfred A. Johnson, Sr., a pro se Ohio prisoner, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his civil action and imposition of filing restric ...
Johnson v. Taco Bell Corp., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 31370 (6th Cir. Nov. 27, 2023): ORDER Alfred A. Johnson, Sr., a pro se Ohio prisoner, appeals the district court’s summary dismissal of his civil action and imposition of filing restrictions.…
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions Require Willful Disobedience of Court Order Or Act Taken in Bad Faith, Vexatiously, Wantonly or For Oppressive Reasons — Finding of Bad Faith Warranted for Knowingly or Recklessly Raising Frivolous Argument Or Arguing Meritorious Claim for Purposes of Harassing Opponent

Rooter Hero Phx., Inc. v. Beebe, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 32661 (9th Cir Dec. 11, 2023) (unpublished): MEMORANDUM* Plaintiffs Rooter Hero Phoenix, Inc. and Call Pro's, Inc. appeal the distr ...
Rooter Hero Phx., Inc. v. Beebe, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 32661 (9th Cir Dec. 11, 2023) (unpublished): MEMORANDUM* Plaintiffs Rooter Hero Phoenix, Inc. and Call Pro’s, Inc. appeal the district court’s order imposing monetary sanctions on their counsel under …
Continue Reading

FRAP 38 And 28 U.S.C. § 1927 Sanctions on Appeal — “Having A Steep Hill To Climb On Appeal Does Not Make An Appeal Frivolous” (Good Quote)

Buck v. Compton, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 33988 (6th Cir. Dec. 20, 2023): *1 Thomas Buck, a former financial advisor, defrauded several of his clients, including Janice Compton. Following Buck’s criminal conviction for fraud, Compton ...
Buck v. Compton, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 33988 (6th Cir. Dec. 20, 2023): *1 Thomas Buck, a former financial advisor, defrauded several of his clients, including Janice Compton. Following Buck’s criminal conviction for fraud, Compton sued Buck, and the parties…
Continue Reading
Previous9101112131415Next

Recent Posts

Rule 37 Default Judgment Sanction: (1) Abuse of Discretion Review = Legal Conclusions De Novo. Factual Findings for Clear Error — (2) Client May Be Sanctioned for Misconduct of Its Counsel, Though Here Client Was Directly Involved in Bad Faith Misbehavior — (3) Is There A Difference, Under Rule 11 As Opposed to Rule 37, Concerning Whether A Client Can Be Sanctioned for Its Counsel’s Misconduct? — (4) While Sanctions of Last Resort (Dismissal/Default) Are Apt Only If Lesser Sanctions Wouldn’t Ensure Compliance, Rule 37 Doesn’t Require the Vain Gesture of First Imposing Lessert Sanctions When It Is Clear They Would be Ineffective — (5) Court’s Reconsideration of Non-Final Orders Is Governed by Rule 54(b), And Court’s Discretion under That Rule Is Governed by the Law-of-the-Case-Doctrine

RICO: (1) Special Pleading Requirements? — (2) Although Enterprise Must Be More Than a Summation of the Predicate Acts, The Predicate Acts Can Demonstrate the Existence of the Enterprise — (3) Requirement That Association-in-Fact Exist For Purposes Other Than Just to Commit Predicate Acts Merely Requires Continuity — (4) To State an Association-in-Fact Enterprise Consisting of One Natural Person and Collection of Legal Fictions Requires Factual Detail As to How They Acted Together — (5) “A § 1962(c) Enterprise Must Be More Than An Association of Individuals Or Entities Conducting the Normal Affairs of a Defendant Corporation” (Good Quote)

RICO: (1) Fee Award May Exceed Amount Recovered — Strict Proportionality Not Required — (2) Nonmonetary Benefits and Injunctive Relief Recovered Also Relevant Factors — (3) Loss on Some Claims Need Not Result in Lowered Fees, Especially When Both Arise Out of The Same Nucleus of Operative Facts

RICO: Indirect Purchasers (Car Buyers/Renters) Lack Standing to Sue Manufacturers for RICO Violations Even Though Intermediaries (Auto Dealer Direct Purchasers) Lack Any Damages

RICO: Statutory Requirement that RICO Be Liberally Construed Does Not Establish a More Liberal Pleading Standard for RICO Claims — “To Be Sure, Adequately Pleading a RICO Claim Can Be Challenging” (Good Quote) — Court May Dismiss Action Pursuant to Rule 41(b) Absent A Motion

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

There Is No Good-Faith Defense For Issuing An Overly Burdensome Subpoena

Purposes of Rule 37 and Section 1927 Sanctions

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice