New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Joseph Hage Aaronson

New York State Spoliation Law — Adverse Inference OK for Negligence — Lack of Lit. Hold ≠ Gross Negligence Per Se — Ct. App. Not Bound by App. Div.’s Characterization in Certification Order

Pegasus Aviation I, Inc., v. Varg Logistica S.A., 26 N.Y.3d 543, 46 N.E.3d 601, 26 N.Y.S.3d 218 (2015): A party that seeks sanctions for spoliation of evidence must show that the party having control over the evidence possessed an obligation …
Continue Reading

Experts — 26(e) ≠ Extension of Deadline to “Deliver Lion’s Share of Expert Info” or Right to Submit “New Rather Than Supplementary” Opinions — 4 Factors to Judge Whether Exclusion OK — Continuance Usually Preferable — Good Quotes

Matter of the Complaint of C.F. Bean LLC (C.F. Bean LLC v. Suzuki Motor Corp.), 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19997 (5th Cir. Nov. 4, 2016): This appeal involves a third-party complaint alleging maritime products liability. In 2012, Mark Barhanovich was…
Continue Reading

Rule 11 Safe Harbor — Filing Rule 11 Motion after Magistrate Judge’s R&R & before District Judge’s Adoption Is Timely — Plaintiff Retains Right to Withdraw Challenged Claim until Adoption

Margetis v. Furgeson, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20293 (5th Cir. Nov. 10, 2016): PER CURIAM:* *   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the…
Continue Reading

Rule 37(c)(1) Sanctions: Barring Plaintiff Who Failed to Disclose Damages Computation Per 26(a)(1) from Contesting Defendant’s Computation of Profits — 7th Am. Guarantees Right to Jury Trial But Not to Bench Trial, Even If Claim Is Equitable

Anhing Corp. v. Viet Phu, Inc., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19967 (9th Cir. Nov. 4, 2016): *   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. In No. 14-56664, plaintiff…
Continue Reading

Text [Email] Evidence — Messages Admitted to Show Tone (Flirtatious, Conversational) and Nature of Relationship Are Not Received for the Truth of Their Contents, Thus Not Hearsay

Hankins v. Commonwealth, 2016 Va. App. LEXIS 249 (Va. Ct. App. Sept. 27, 2016): *   Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. Gary Stephen Hankins ("appellant") appeals his felony convictions of six counts of taking …
Continue Reading

Arbitration — FAA Requirement That Motion to Vacate Be Served within 3 Months of Award Is Subject to Equitable Tolling (Circuit Split) — Award Vacated Because Panel Chair Lied About Credentials

Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Mkts., Inc., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19930 (9th Cir. Nov. 4, 2016): Move, Inc. (Move) appeals the district court's order dismissing its action and denying its motion to vacate an arbitration award pursuant to the…
Continue Reading

Rule 37 Dismissal Sanction Requires Wilfulness, Bad Faith, Fault — 4 Factors — 2 Years’ Noncompliance = Inference of Wilfulness — Order May Inc. Doc. Requests — Boilerplate Clam of Search Doesn’t Demonstrate Adequacy or Explain Missing Docs

Bhagwanani v. Brown, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19892 (2d Cir. Nov. 4, 2016): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the August 28, 2015 judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Plaintiffs appeal from…
Continue Reading
Previous159160161162163164165Next

Recent Articles

Rule 37 Discovery Sanctions: Ninth Circuit’s Five-Factor Test for Gauging Appropriateness of Dismissal — The Limited Utility of Rule 12(f) Motions to Strike

RICO: Employer Suffered Harm to Business or Propoerty When Kickbacks Paid to Employees in Real Estate Transactions Done for Employer — Expert Testimony Sufficient to Prove Harm — Proof That Employer Paid Above-Market Prices Not Essential — Non-Disclosure of Certain Damages in Initial Disclosures Cured by Expert Report, Which Also Rendered Initial Non-Disclosure Harmless

Spoliation: Dismissal Under Rule 37(e)(2) and Monetary Sanctions Under Rule 37(e)(1), Implicitly Reading The “Or” Between 37(e)(1) and 37(e)(2) As Conjunctive, Not Disjunctive — Clear Error Standard of Review for District Court’s Intent (= Bad Faith) Finding under 37(e)(2)(C) — Additional Monetary Sanctions Imposed on Claimants under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Rule 37(a)(5) — No Right to Jury Determination of Intent under Rule 37(e)(2) — “Substantially Justified” in Rule 37(a)(5) Has Same Meaning As In Equal Access to Justice Act and Thus Rule 11 — Meaning of “Unreasonable and Vexatious” in 7th Circuit

Inherent Power Sanction of Dismissal — Preponderance of the Evidence Burden of Proof, Not Clear and Convincing Evidence (7th Circuit)

§ 1927 Sanctions — Must A Lawyer Who Unreasonably and Vexatiously Multiplies Federal Court Proceedings Be Acting “As An Attorney” When Committing the Misconduct To Be Subject to Sanction under § 1927?

Rule 37 Sanctions — Unfamiliarity With Litigation Process Does Not Excuse Intentional Disregard of Court Order — Also Affirming Rule 26(g) Sanctions on Clients and Counsel for False Representations That All Responsive Documents Had Been Produced

Supreme Court: Notice of Appeal Filed After The Original Deadline But Before Reopening by The District Court Is Timely — It Relates Forward to The Date of The Order Making The Appeal Possible — Second Notice of Appeal After Reopening Unnecessary

Rule 37 Default Judgment: Second Circuit’s Four-Factor Test for Imposing Defaults and Three-Factor Test for Lifting Them

Rule 37 Default Judgment — Tenth Circuit Multifactor Test Is Not Exhaustive But a Non-Exclusive List of “Sometimes-Helpful Criteria Or Guide Posts”— Appeal from Preliminary Injunction Mooted by Entry of Permanent Injunction — Difficulty in Collecting Damages Award May Equal Irreparable Injury — A Monetary Award For Past Conduct Does Not Preclude A Permanent Injunction Against Similar Wrongful Conduct Likely To Occur In The Future

RICO: Cover-Up Within Limitations Period of Untimely RICO Violation “Was Merely A Continuation” Of The Original Injury And Could Not Be Used “As A ‘Bootstrap’ To Salvage [The] Time-Barred Claims–Declining to Apply Pinkerton Doctrine to Civil RICO Claims

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2025 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice