New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Joseph Hage Aaronson

RICO: No Injury Where Landlord Breached Statutory Duty to List on Lease Address of Bank in Which Security Deposits Held But Gave Plaintiffs Everything They Were Owed — To Allege that a Fact Is or Is Not True Is Not a Factual Claim at All (Good Quote)

Wall v. Michigan Rental, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4094 (6th Cir. Mar. 6, 2017): What started out as a landlord-tenant dispute has become a lawsuit under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Mariah Wall, Christopher Boston, and Craig…
Continue Reading

Noerr-Pennington Doctrine Protects Actions before Courts and Administrative Agencies, Pre-Litigation Threat Letters and Settlement Offers and “Concerted Efforts Incident to Litigation” — Sham Exception Requires Objective Baselessness

Singh v. NYCTL 2009-A Trust, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4961 (2d Cir. Mar. 21, 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED…
Continue Reading

Removal: Given That District Court May Not Sua Sponte Remand for a Procedural Defect, Is Removal by a Forum Defendant Procedural or Jurisdictional? — Circuit Split — Domicile, Not Residence, Determines Citizenship for Diversity Purposes

Martin v. Phillips, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37792 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 16, 2017): ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and therefore have an obligation to inquire into their subject matter…
Continue Reading

Sanctions: Due Process Satisfied If Court Exercises Personal Jurisdiction over Individual Who Is Alter Ego of Entity over Which Court Has Jurisdiction — Appeals: Contentions Not Raised in Argument Section of Opening Brief Waived

Aldmyr Sys., Inc. v. Friedman, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2338 (4th Cir. Feb. 9, 2017): PER CURIAM: Aldmyr Systems, Inc., and Zegato Solutions, Inc. (collectively "Appellants"), appeal the district court's dismissal of their complaint and the court's determination that sanctions…
Continue Reading

RICO Conspiracy: Neither Suspicions about Nor Investigation into Miscreant’s Conduct = Conspiracy, Which Requires More Than Knowledge & Presence — Pleading: Importance of Including a General Denial in Answer (Good Language to Quote)

Aguilar v. PNC Bank, N.A., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2150 (8th Cir. Feb. 7, 2017): Ninety-two plaintiffs1 filed suit against PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC), alleging, among other things, (1) violations of Missouri's Uniform Fiduciaries Law (UFL); (2) aiding and…
Continue Reading

Evidence-Summarizing Charts under Fed. R. Evid. 1006 — Non-Voluminous Information (Texts) May Be Deemed Voluminous When It Cannot Conveniently Be Examined in Court and Is Pulled from Vast Fields of Information

Osborne, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 59 (11th Cir. Jan. 4, 2017):  PER CURIAM: Appellant Damien Bernard Osborne challenges his conviction for armed bank robbery, following a three-day jury trial. He raises arguments that the district court improperly admitted two categories…
Continue Reading
Previous144145146147148149150Next

Recent Articles

§ 1927 Sanctions — Must A Lawyer Who Unreasonably and Vexatiously Multiplies Federal Court Proceedings Be Acting “As An Attorney” When Committing the Misconduct To Be Subject to Sanction under § 1927?

Rule 37 Sanctions — Unfamiliarity With Litigation Process Does Not Excuse Intentional Disregard of Court Order — Also Affirming Rule 26(g) Sanctions on Clients and Counsel for False Representations That All Responsive Documents Had Been Produced

Supreme Court: Notice of Appeal Filed After The Original Deadline But Before Reopening by The District Court Is Timely — It Relates Forward to The Date of The Order Making The Appeal Possible — Second Notice of Appeal After Reopening Unnecessary

Rule 37 Default Judgment: Second Circuit’s Four-Factor Test for Imposing Defaults and Three-Factor Test for Lifting Them

Rule 37 Default Judgment — Tenth Circuit Multifactor Test Is Not Exhaustive But a Non-Exclusive List of “Sometimes-Helpful Criteria Or Guide Posts”— Appeal from Preliminary Injunction Mooted by Entry of Permanent Injunction — Difficulty in Collecting Damages Award May Equal Irreparable Injury — A Monetary Award For Past Conduct Does Not Preclude A Permanent Injunction Against Similar Wrongful Conduct Likely To Occur In The Future

RICO: Cover-Up Within Limitations Period of Untimely RICO Violation “Was Merely A Continuation” Of The Original Injury And Could Not Be Used “As A ‘Bootstrap’ To Salvage [The] Time-Barred Claims–Declining to Apply Pinkerton Doctrine to Civil RICO Claims

Inherent Power — Circumstantial Evidence — Fact That Bad Faith May Be Shown by Establishing That Conduct Was So Egregious It Was Necessarily Committed in Bad Faith Does Not Mean That Bad Faith Must Be The Sole Explanation for The Bad Conduct

RICO Causation: Testing Labs’ Misstatements As to Alcohol Tests’ Efficacy Not Communicated to Plaintiffs’ Employers Did Not Cause Plaintiffs’ Professional Harm

Supreme Court: Standing — When The Government Prohibits Or Impedes Company A from Using Company B’s Product, Both Are Objects of the Government’s Action And Have Standing to Contest It — “To Demonstrate Standing, Plaintiffs Must Answer A Basic Question—‘What’s It To You?’” (Good Quote) — Expert Evidence Not Required to Establish Standing — “Judges Are Not Required To Exhibit A Naiveté From Which Ordinary Citizens Are Free’” (Good Quote)

Rule 37(d) Sanctions — For Failure to Serve Answers, Objections, Or Written Response to Discovery Requests — Are Not Limited to Intentional Misconduct; Even Innocent Mistakes May Be Covered

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2025 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice