New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Joseph Hage Aaronson

Rule 11 Sanctions — If a Party Forms a Belief Based on a Reasonable Inquiry Limited by a Prospective Adversary’s Withholding of Information, Asserts That Its Position “Will Likely Have Evidentiary Support,” Party Has Satisfied Rule 11

Amgen Inc.v. Hospira, Inc., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14747 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2017): Amgen Inc. ("Amgen") appeals an order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denying Amgen's motion to compel discovery from Hospira, Inc.…
Continue Reading

RICO: Failure to Allege Violations of Predicate Acts Listed in § 1961(1) Dooms Claim — Judicial Recusal: Fact Judge’s Son Is Non-Partner Lawyer at Firm Before Her Doesn’t Require Recusal

Brown v. Burch, Porter & Johnson, PLLC, 2016 WL 9448027 (6th Cir. Nov. 21, 2016):   *1 Pro se litigant Kim Brown appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act…
Continue Reading

Social Media Authentication — Facebook Message Excluded for Failure to Present Evidence of Distinctive Characteristics Linking Contents Linking to Alleged Sender — Methods of Twitter & Facebook Authentication

Richardson v State, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 286 (Ind. Ct. App. July 6, 2017): P1 Appellant-Defendant, Terrance L. Richardson (Richardson), appeals his conviction for murder, a felony, Ind. Code § 35-42-1-1. P2 We affirm. ISSUES P3 Richardson raises two issues…
Continue Reading

Judicial Notice of Internet Evidence: Attorney Affidavit of Search of Government Website Sufficient to Authenticate Printout on Summary Judgment — Testimony Chat Log Fully and Fairly Reproduces Chats Also Sufficient

Brown v. JNH Invs., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117889 (E.D. Tex. July 7, 2017):  [*1] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONOF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendants JNH Investments, Inc., J and H Investments Group, LLC, John Alsenih, and…
Continue Reading

Emails May Be Authenticated Circumstantially—Party’s Emails Are Admissions, 3rd Parties’ OK for Context — Wayback Machine Authenticable by Custodian Testimony, and Other Website Printouts by Testimony from Person Who Downloaded It

United States v. Gasperini, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114166 (E.D.N.Y. July 21, 2017): Defendant Fabio Gasperini is charged with two counts of computer intrusion, one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, one count of wire fraud, and one count …
Continue Reading

Inherent Power Sanctions: Evidence Preclusion, Attorneys’ Fees for Extrajudicial Conduct Aimed at Jury Pool & Potential Witnesses (Website, Ringless Voicemails) & Ethical Violations of Lawyer-Party (Lack of Candor to the Court & Obstruction)

Diamond Consortium, Inc. v Manookian, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122625 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2017): Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Order to Show Cause (Potential Contempt of Court and Sanctions) (the "Emergency Motion") (Dkt. 269), the…
Continue Reading

Rule 11 Sanctions — Safe Harbor Must Be Honored Only Once Per Motion — If Denied without Prejudice, Motion May Be Renewed without Additional Safe Harbor — Needn’t Be 100% Identical 2d Time But Must Be Essentially the Same Motion (Case Law Split)

Merritt v. Lake Jovita Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 2010 WL 11507746 (M.D. Fla. May 11, 2010): *1 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants Lyons Heritage Pasco, LLC, Lyons Land Pasco, LLC, Bobby Lyons, and Morris Needles’ (the “Lyons Defendants”) Motion for Relief…
Continue Reading
Previous132133134135136137138Next

Recent Articles

FRAP 38 and Pro Se Litigants — Observations, Not Sanctions, For Non-Existent Quotations

Rule 37(c)(1) Exclusion Sanction: Under R&R Sails, A Discovery Sanction Is Not Claim Dispositive Just Because It Makes It “Much More Difficult, Perhaps Almost Impossible” For A Party To Proceed With Its Claim Or Argument — The Sanction Must Be Fatal — Only Then Is Proof of Willfulness, Fault Or Bad Faith Required — To The Extent The Imposition Of Sanctions Turns On The Resolution Of An Issue Of Law, Review Is De Novo

Supreme Court: Party Moving to Set Aside Void Judgment Under Rule 60(b)(4) Must Do So Within A Reasonable Time Per Rule 60(c)(1)

Supreme Court: Erie/Rule 8/Rule 11: Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Conflicts with and Overrides Delaware’s Affidavit of Merit in Medical Malpractice Actions — A Valid Rule of Civil Procedure Displaces Contrary State Law Even If The State Law Is Substantive — Rule 11’s Proviso That “[U]nless A Rule Or Statute Specifical States Otherwise, A Pleading Need Not Be Verified Or Accompanied By An Affidavit” Refers to Rules Or Statutes Requiring Represented Parties To Verify Pleading Or Sign Affidavits — It Has Nothing To Do With Affidavits From Third Parties — Good Quote: Drawing A Negative Inference from Text Is Sometimes the Best Way To Understand It

RICO Statute of Limitations — Storm Warnings, Not Thunder and Lightning (Good Quote)

Rule 37 Discovery Sanctions: Ninth Circuit’s Five-Factor Test for Gauging Appropriateness of Dismissal — The Limited Utility of Rule 12(f) Motions to Strike

RICO: Employer Suffered Harm to Business or Property When Kickbacks Paid to Employees in Real Estate Transactions Done for Employer — Expert Testimony Sufficient to Prove Harm — Proof That Employer Paid Above-Market Prices Not Essential — Non-Disclosure of Certain Damages in Initial Disclosures Cured by Expert Report, Which Also Rendered Initial Non-Disclosure Harmless

Spoliation: Dismissal Under Rule 37(e)(2) and Monetary Sanctions Under Rule 37(e)(1), Implicitly Reading The “Or” Between 37(e)(1) and 37(e)(2) As Conjunctive, Not Disjunctive — Clear Error Standard of Review for District Court’s Intent (= Bad Faith) Finding under 37(e)(2)(C) — Additional Monetary Sanctions Imposed on Claimants under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Rule 37(a)(5) — No Right to Jury Determination of Intent under Rule 37(e)(2) — “Substantially Justified” in Rule 37(a)(5) Has Same Meaning As In Equal Access to Justice Act and Thus Rule 11 — Meaning of “Unreasonable and Vexatious” in 7th Circuit

Inherent Power Sanction of Dismissal — Preponderance of the Evidence Burden of Proof, Not Clear and Convincing Evidence (7th Circuit)

§ 1927 Sanctions — Must A Lawyer Who Unreasonably and Vexatiously Multiplies Federal Court Proceedings Be Acting “As An Attorney” When Committing the Misconduct To Be Subject to Sanction under § 1927?

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2026 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice