New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Joseph Hage Aaronson

Rule 41(d) Dismissal Sanction: Factors — Wasting Time, Money & Effort Pursuing Cooperation = Prejudice from Plaintiff’s Failure to Prosecute — Abuse of Discretion Standard (Sixth Circuit)

Crawford v. Beaumont, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18887 (6th Cir. Sept. 12, 2017): Anitra E. Crawford, a Michigan resident proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing her civil rights case filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.…
Continue Reading

Rule 37(c)(1) Sanctions: Failure to Disclose Witness Bars Use of Declaration on SJ—Alternatively, Must Document Where Wit.’s Name Came Up in Discovery—Abuse of Discretion Standard (7th Cir.)—Exclusion OK Where No Alternative Proposed

King v. Ford Motor Co., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19013 (7th Cir. Oct. 2, 2017): LaWanda King worked for many years as an assembler in Ford Motor Company's vehicle assembly plants. After transferring to its Chicago plant in 2010, though,…
Continue Reading

RICO: Innocuous Wire Transactions Used to Build Trust = Wire Fraud — Intrabank Transfer May Be Bookkeeping Entry, Not Sufficiently Plead —Analysis in Unappealed Order Granting Prior Dismissal Disregarded — Denial of Leave to Amend Strictly Reviewed

Bui v. Ton Phi, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20304 (9th Cir. Oct. 17, 2017): Mai Ngoc Bui appeals the district court's grant of Defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations [*2]  (RICO) claim from her…
Continue Reading

Experts: CEO Opinion Based on CEO Experience=701 But If Tech’l Knowl. Used = 702 — 37(c)(1) Sanction for No Expert Rep’t: 4 Factors — Still Prejudiced If You Know the Unreported Opinion — Waiver by Not Defending All Claims Attacked

Dynamic Concepts, Inc. v. Tri-State Surgical Supply & Equipment Ltd., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22348 (2d Cir. Nov. 8, 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgments and orders of the…
Continue Reading

FRAP 12.1 Allows Limited Remand So That District Court Can Implement Prior Indicative Ruling — Actual Prior Indicative Ruling under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1 Unnecessary If District Court’s Views Clear

Mendia v. Garcia, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22102 (9th Cir. Nov. 3, 2017):     Bernardo Mendia, a naturalized U.S. citizen, was detained in county jail when Immigration and Customs [*3]  Enforcement ("ICE") agents John Garcia and Ching Chang lodged an immigration…
Continue Reading

12(b)(6) Motions: SEC Filings and News Articles Judicially Noticeable to Show What Was Available to the Market (Securities Action), Not for Truth — Are Forms 4 Noticeable Absent Allegations of Stock Sales? Case Law Split

Shenwick v. Twitter, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170901 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2017): Twitter is a social media company that, like other social media companies, depends on advertising revenue. Accordingly, how many users Twitter has, and whether those…
Continue Reading

RICO: Causal Chain Too Attenuated for Third Party Payors to Sue for Improper Off-Label Uses — Need to Attach Expert Report (Here, Regression Analysis) to Complaint to Save It If Nothing Comparable Exists In Published Literature

Sidney Hillman Health Ctr. of Rochester v. Abbott Labs., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19925 (7th Cir. Oct. 12, 2017): The Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of Depakote (divalproex [*2]  sodium) to treat seizures, migraine headaches, and some…
Continue Reading

Rule 37(c)(1) Sanctions: If Exclusion = Dismissal, Must Consider Lesser Sanctions — 37(b) + 37(c)(1) Factors — Meaning of Abuse of Discretion (10th Cir.); Court Must Explain Decision—If Fees Awarded after Appeal Noticed, Must Notice Again or Amend

HCG Platinum, LLC v. Preferred Prod. Placement Corp., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20229 (10th Cir. Oct. 17, 2017): HCG Platinum, LLC ("HCG") and Preferred Product Placement Corporation ("PPPC") entered into a Manufacturer's Representative Agreement ("Marketing Agreement"), under which PPPC agreed…
Continue Reading
Previous122123124125126127128Next

Recent Articles

nherent Power Sanction of Dismissal — Preponderance of the Evidence Burden of Proof, Not Clear and Convincing Evidence (7th Circuit)

§ 1927 Sanctions — Must A Lawyer Who Unreasonably and Vexatiously Multiplies Federal Court Proceedings Be Acting “As An Attorney” When Committing the Misconduct To Be Subject to Sanction under § 1927?

Rule 37 Sanctions — Unfamiliarity With Litigation Process Does Not Excuse Intentional Disregard of Court Order — Also Affirming Rule 26(g) Sanctions on Clients and Counsel for False Representations That All Responsive Documents Had Been Produced

Supreme Court: Notice of Appeal Filed After The Original Deadline But Before Reopening by The District Court Is Timely — It Relates Forward to The Date of The Order Making The Appeal Possible — Second Notice of Appeal After Reopening Unnecessary

Rule 37 Default Judgment: Second Circuit’s Four-Factor Test for Imposing Defaults and Three-Factor Test for Lifting Them

Rule 37 Default Judgment — Tenth Circuit Multifactor Test Is Not Exhaustive But a Non-Exclusive List of “Sometimes-Helpful Criteria Or Guide Posts”— Appeal from Preliminary Injunction Mooted by Entry of Permanent Injunction — Difficulty in Collecting Damages Award May Equal Irreparable Injury — A Monetary Award For Past Conduct Does Not Preclude A Permanent Injunction Against Similar Wrongful Conduct Likely To Occur In The Future

RICO: Cover-Up Within Limitations Period of Untimely RICO Violation “Was Merely A Continuation” Of The Original Injury And Could Not Be Used “As A ‘Bootstrap’ To Salvage [The] Time-Barred Claims–Declining to Apply Pinkerton Doctrine to Civil RICO Claims

Inherent Power — Circumstantial Evidence — Fact That Bad Faith May Be Shown by Establishing That Conduct Was So Egregious It Was Necessarily Committed in Bad Faith Does Not Mean That Bad Faith Must Be The Sole Explanation for The Bad Conduct

RICO Causation: Testing Labs’ Misstatements As to Alcohol Tests’ Efficacy Not Communicated to Plaintiffs’ Employers Did Not Cause Plaintiffs’ Professional Harm

Supreme Court: Standing — When The Government Prohibits Or Impedes Company A from Using Company B’s Product, Both Are Objects of the Government’s Action And Have Standing to Contest It — “To Demonstrate Standing, Plaintiffs Must Answer A Basic Question—‘What’s It To You?’” (Good Quote) — Expert Evidence Not Required to Establish Standing — “Judges Are Not Required To Exhibit A Naiveté From Which Ordinary Citizens Are Free’” (Good Quote)

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2025 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice