New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Joseph Hage Aaronson

Sanctions: Rule 37 Does Not Require the Vain Gesture of Imposing Ineffective Lesser Sanctions before Dismissal Where Futility and Willfulness or Bad Faith Are Clear (Good Quote) — Meaning of Abuse of Discretion in Third Circuit

Fortson v. City of Baldwin, 2017 WL 4685532 (3d Cir. Oct. 19, 2017): PER CURIAM: Major and Laura Fortson, two individuals proceeding pro se, appeal the district court’s dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as a sanction …
Continue Reading

Supreme Court: Appeals — Timeliness — Filing Deadline Set by Statute Is Jurisdictional, Not If Set by Rule — Then Can Be Waived — Equitable Exceptions Also Possible (Reasoning Not Limited to Appeals)

Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs., 2017 U.S. LEXIS 6765 (U.S. Nov. 8, 2017): This case presents a question of time, specifically, time to file a notice of appeal from a district court’s judgment. In Bowles v. Russell, 551 U. …
Continue Reading

RICO: “The point of Rule 9(b) Is Precisely to Prevent Defendant-Clumping … by Requiring the Plaintiff to Allege Each Defendant’s Specific Participation in the Fraud” (Good Quote) — Use of RICO Case Statement on 12(b)(6) OK

Emess Capital, LLC v. Rothstein, 2011 WL 13214302 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 9, 2011) (R&R): *1 This matter is before the Court for a Report and Recommendations on two dispositive motions: (1) Defendant TD Bank N.A.’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13)…
Continue Reading

RICO: Injury from 1 Predicate Act Enough — Mail Fraud: Must ID a Mailing; 9(b)/Iqbal Caution — No Causation If Injury Could Occur w/o Predicate Act Or Is Not Directly Tied to Predicate Act — Only Bank Can Sue for Financial Institution Fraud

Empire Merchants, LLC v. Reliable Churchill LLLP, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186669 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2017): Plaintiff, Empire Merchants, LLC ("Empire"), is a liquor [*2]  wholesaler operating in New York City. Empire brings this action against numerous defendants, including a…
Continue Reading

Protective Orders: Which In-House Counsel Should Be Barred from Highly Confidential Info? — Corp. Secretary, Board Attendee, Member of Sr. Mgmt. Committee Too Senior, Interactions with Decisionmakers Too Risky — Website of Party = Admission & 803(6)

Silversun Indus. v. PPG Indus., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183647 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 6, 2017): INTRODUCTION Defendant, PPG, is a Forbes 500, multi-billion dollar, world-wide company, in the business of supplying paints, paint coatings, optical products, and specialty materials. Defendant,…
Continue Reading

Rule 41(d) Dismissal Sanction: Factors — Wasting Time, Money & Effort Pursuing Cooperation = Prejudice from Plaintiff’s Failure to Prosecute — Abuse of Discretion Standard (Sixth Circuit)

Crawford v. Beaumont, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18887 (6th Cir. Sept. 12, 2017): Anitra E. Crawford, a Michigan resident proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing her civil rights case filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.…
Continue Reading

Rule 37(c)(1) Sanctions: Failure to Disclose Witness Bars Use of Declaration on SJ—Alternatively, Must Document Where Wit.’s Name Came Up in Discovery—Abuse of Discretion Standard (7th Cir.)—Exclusion OK Where No Alternative Proposed

King v. Ford Motor Co., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19013 (7th Cir. Oct. 2, 2017): LaWanda King worked for many years as an assembler in Ford Motor Company's vehicle assembly plants. After transferring to its Chicago plant in 2010, though,…
Continue Reading

RICO: Innocuous Wire Transactions Used to Build Trust = Wire Fraud — Intrabank Transfer May Be Bookkeeping Entry, Not Sufficiently Plead —Analysis in Unappealed Order Granting Prior Dismissal Disregarded — Denial of Leave to Amend Strictly Reviewed

Bui v. Ton Phi, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20304 (9th Cir. Oct. 17, 2017): Mai Ngoc Bui appeals the district court's grant of Defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations [*2]  (RICO) claim from her…
Continue Reading

Experts: CEO Opinion Based on CEO Experience=701 But If Tech’l Knowl. Used = 702 — 37(c)(1) Sanction for No Expert Rep’t: 4 Factors — Still Prejudiced If You Know the Unreported Opinion — Waiver by Not Defending All Claims Attacked

Dynamic Concepts, Inc. v. Tri-State Surgical Supply & Equipment Ltd., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22348 (2d Cir. Nov. 8, 2017): SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgments and orders of the…
Continue Reading
Previous111112113114115116117Next

Recent Articles

RICO: Fraudulent Concealment Must Prevent Discovery of the Injury to Toll Statute of Limitations

Rule 37 Default Judgment Sanction: (1) Abuse of Discretion Review = Legal Conclusions De Novo. Factual Findings for Clear Error — (2) Client May Be Sanctioned for Misconduct of Its Counsel, Though Here Client Was Directly Involved in Bad Faith Misbehavior — (3) Is There A Difference, Under Rule 11 As Opposed to Rule 37, Concerning Whether A Client Can Be Sanctioned for Its Counsel’s Misconduct? — (4) While Sanctions of Last Resort (Dismissal/Default) Are Apt Only If Lesser Sanctions Wouldn’t Ensure Compliance, Rule 37 Doesn’t Require the Vain Gesture of First Imposing Lessert Sanctions When It Is Clear They Would be Ineffective — (5) Court’s Reconsideration of Non-Final Orders Is Governed by Rule 54(b), And Court’s Discretion under That Rule Is Governed by the Law-of-the-Case-Doctrine

RICO: (1) Special Pleading Requirements? — (2) Although Enterprise Must Be More Than a Summation of the Predicate Acts, The Predicate Acts Can Demonstrate the Existence of the Enterprise — (3) Requirement That Association-in-Fact Exist For Purposes Other Than Just to Commit Predicate Acts Merely Requires Continuity — (4) To State an Association-in-Fact Enterprise Consisting of One Natural Person and Collection of Legal Fictions Requires Factual Detail As to How They Acted Together — (5) “A § 1962(c) Enterprise Must Be More Than An Association of Individuals Or Entities Conducting the Normal Affairs of a Defendant Corporation” (Good Quote)

RICO: (1) Fee Award May Exceed Amount Recovered — Strict Proportionality Not Required — (2) Nonmonetary Benefits and Injunctive Relief Recovered Also Relevant Factors — (3) Loss on Some Claims Need Not Result in Lowered Fees, Especially When Both Arise Out of The Same Nucleus of Operative Facts

RICO: Indirect Purchasers (Car Buyers/Renters) Lack Standing to Sue Manufacturers for RICO Violations Even Though Intermediaries (Auto Dealer Direct Purchasers) Lack Any Damages

RICO: Statutory Requirement that RICO Be Liberally Construed Does Not Establish a More Liberal Pleading Standard for RICO Claims — “To Be Sure, Adequately Pleading a RICO Claim Can Be Challenging” (Good Quote) — Court May Dismiss Action Pursuant to Rule 41(b) Absent A Motion

Electronic Spoliation/Rule 37(e): (1) Finding of Recklessness But Neither Gross Negligence Nor Willfulness in Loss of Video Evidence Precludes Rule 37(e)(2)’s Severest Sanctions Because (i) No Intent to Deprive and (ii) Rule 37(e)(2) Displaces District Court’s Power to Invoke Inherent Power to Impose Those Sanctions — (2) Appellate Review = Abuse of Discretion, With The Caveat That Whether The District Court Applied The Correct Legal Standards Is Reviewed De Novo — (3) Inherent Power Is Often Available As An Alternate Source of Sanctioning Power But Can Be Limited by Rule or Statute, Something Which Courts Do Not Lightly Presume — (4) The Text of Rule 37(e)(2), As Confirmed by the Advisory Committee Note, Displaces Inherent Power to Impose the Sanctions Specified in the Rule or Any More Severe Sanctions — (5) “Intent to Deprive” in Rule 37(e)(2) = “The Willful Destruction Of Evidence With The Purpose Of Avoiding Its Discovery By An Adverse Party” — (6) Appellate Standing Conferred by Virtue of Issuance of Sanctions Regardless of Merits Outcome — (7) Value of Advisory Committee Notes in Interpreting Rules Enacted without Change Despite General Reticence to Rely on Legislative History

RICO: (1) Plaintiff Need Not Suffer Injury from Each Predicate Act to Establish Standing, And The Pattern May Include Predicates As to Which No Plaintiff Has Standing — (2) 7 Elements of a Civil RICO Claim (2d Circuit Articulation) Which Must Be Established As to Each Defendant — (3) Requirements of an Association-in-Fact Enterprise — (4) Each Defendant Must Personally Commit 2 or More Predicate Acts — (5) Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Horizontal and Vertical Elements — (6) No Requirement That All Members of a RICO Enterprise Joined at Inception — Can Join Over Time/Others Can Quit — (7) Cannot Charge 2 Predicate Acts Where One Action Violates Two Statutes — (8) A Footnote to Consider for Briefs: “Unless Otherwise Noted, When Quoting Judicial Decisions This Order Accepts All Alterations And Omits All Citations, Footnotes, And Internal Quotation Marks.”

For An Appeal to Be Timely, A Motion for Reconsideration in The District Court (A Rule 59(e) Motion) Must Be Filed, And Not Just Served within 30 Days of The Decision, to Toll The 30-Day Period for Filing An Appeal

There Is No Good-Faith Defense For Issuing An Overly Burdensome Subpoena

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice