New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
Commercial Litigation and Arbitration
« Back to Complex Lit Blog

Facebook Post Authenticated by Its Content, Timing, Appended Name, Witness Testimony She Recognizes Page as Alleged Author’s & Fact Page Is Password Protected — There Are as Many Ways to Try a Case as There Are Trial Lawyers (Good Quote)

Download PDF

State v. Fawver, 2015 Wash. App. LEXIS 1208 (Wash. Ct. App. June 9, 2015):

Corey Fawver challenges his convictions for first degree burglary and second degree assault, alleging both that his counsel's performance was flawed and the evidence did not support the assault conviction. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

The incident in question arose after Mr. Fawver was forcefully thrown out of a New Year's Party at the residence of Christopher Pierce in Deer Park. Pierce punched and pushed Fawver out of the event in the early hours of January 1, 2013. Fawver left on foot and texted a friend that he had been "jumped" at the party.

Three friends arrived in a truck to pick up Fawver; they were followed in another car by two other men. The six men drove in the two vehicles back to Pierce's residence, arriving around 3:00 a.m. Several of the men, armed with baseball bats, [*2]  entered the residence and a melee ensued. Many of the partygoers fought back against the invaders. Two of them identified Fawver as being among the group wielding baseball bats.

Pierce eventually was discovered outside, bleeding from head and face injuries. Among his injuries, he was discovered to have subdural hematomas and star-shaped skull fracture consistent with a blunt force injury. Pierce, who did not want to cooperate with investigators, was found to have a blood alcohol level of .17. Fawver, who was interviewed by police three months after the incident, told them that he also had been very intoxicated that evening.

Mr. Fawver and another man eventually were jointly charged with first degree burglary and second degree assault; each charge also was alleged to have been committed with a deadly weapon other than a firearm. The charging theory on the assault count was that the two men had assaulted Pierce "with a deadly weapon, to-wit: a baseball bat." Clerk's Papers (CP) at 1-2. Mr. Fawver's matter proceeded to a separate jury trial without the co-defendant.

Detective Michael Drapeau testified that he "screen grabbed" images from the Facebook page of Mr. Corey Fawver. One posting, shared with the jury, was [*3]  from January 1, 2013. Mr. Fawver's name and picture accompanied the post. The post was admitted as an exhibit without objection. It read: "Wow What a fun Night ppl [people] in dp [Deer Park] are not bad as they think they are." Exhibit 1, see Report of Proceedings (RP) at 140.

The defense presented evidence that Mr. Fawver had not wanted to return to the scene with his friends and had not wielded a weapon. Mr. Fawver did not testify. Defense counsel argued the case to the jury on a theory that his client reluctantly had been present but had not taken part in the fight. The jury was instructed, in relevant part, that to convict Mr. Fawver of second degree assault, it had to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he "assaulted Christopher Pierce with a deadly weapon." CP at 63. The jury also was instructed on the definition of a "deadly weapon" and on accomplice liability. CP at 67, 69.

The jury convicted Mr. Fawver on both counts and also concluded that the crimes were committed with a deadly weapon. Given Mr. Pierce's active participation in the offense, the court imposed an exceptional sentence below the standard range of 3 months to be served consecutively to the 36 months required by the deadly weapon enhancements. [*4]  Mr. Fawver then timely appealed to this court. The State did not cross appeal the exceptional sentence.

ANALYSIS

Mr. Fawver's appeal challenges both his counsel's performance and the evidence supporting the assault conviction. We address the two issues in the order noted.

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Mr. Fawver first alleges that his trial counsel performed ineffectively by not objecting to the Facebook post and by not seeking an

Share this article:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Recent Posts

The Word “Include” May Be A Word of Limitation As Opposed to a Word of Enlargement, Depending on the Context

RICO — Pleading Conspiracy — Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Allege That the Defendants Knowingly Joined the RICO Conspiracy — Sparse Allegations of Knowledge of Fraud Due to Participation in a Commercial Transaction Insufficient to State RICO Conspiracy Claim Where Allegations Not Inconsistent with Ordinary Commercial Behavior — While Knowledge May Be Pled “Generally” under Rule 9(b), It Cannot Be Alleged Conclusorily and Must Satisfy the Twiqbal Plausibility Standard

Depositions: Improper to Object to Form to Straightforward Questions (Not Compound, Vague, Leading or Speculative) — Lack of Foundation Objection Improper in 30(b)(6) Deposition — Improper to “Educate” Witness During Breaks of 30(b)(6) Deposition Through Witness Calls to Knowledgeable Corporate Colleagues — Magistrate Judge May Impose Financial Sanctions

Spoliation/Sanctions: “A Party Does Not Spoliate Evidence When, Without Notice Of The Evidence’s Potential Relevance, It Destroys The Evidence According To Its Policy Or In The Normal Course Of Its Business” (Good Quote)

RICO: Fraud on Government Entities Causing Plaintiffs to Pay More for Inmate Calls Actionable on Bridge v. Phoenix Bond Analysis — Fact That Governments Had Separate Injuries As Part of the Scheme (from Reduced Commissions) Irrelevant — Plaintiffs’ Injuries Not Derivative of Governments’ — The Fraud on the Governments Was Not Too Distinct From Plaintiffs’ Injuries But Rather Necessary to Injure Plaintiffs — No Risk of Duplicative Recoveries and No Plaintiff Better Situated to Sue for Plaintiffs’ Injuries

Inherent Power Sanctions — Dismissal for Threatening Defendant and Magistrate Judge — No First Amendment Right to Threaten Violence

RICO: Domestic Injury — Delivery of Fraudulently Non-Conforming Goods FOB Los Angeles for Shipment to China Means Injury Arose Domestically When Purchaser Took Title —Other Relevant Factors Include That The Non-Conforming Goods Were Sourced and Made in the U.S. and The Racketeering Activity (Mail/Wire Fraud) Occurred in, and Was Directed from, the United States — Irrelevant to Domestic Injury Inquiry Whether Property Is Tangible or Intangible — 7th Circuit’s “Injury-Felt” Test of Domestic Injury Rejected by Supreme Court — RICO Standing Requires Concrete Financial Loss, Not Merely Injury to Valuable Intangible Property Interest (9th Circuit)

RICO Causation: Parents of Children with Disabilities Deprived In-Person Education and Services during the Pandemic Were Not Causally Injured by Teachers’ False Assurances to Federal Authorities That IDEA-Complaint Policies Were in Place, Which Caused Funds to Issue But Not to the Benefit of the Disabled Children — Damages Too Indirect — Proper Plaintiff Is U.S. Government — Private Injunctive Relief Under RICO Uncertain in Third Circuit

Sanctions: Rule 37(b)(2) Dismissal — Sixth Circuit Factors

Inherent Power Sanctions — Extrajudicial Misconduct: Sanctions Power Extends to Conduct Intended to Sabotage Court’s Ability to Adjudicate the Case Before It, Here, By Commencing State Court Actions Seeking to Enjoin the Federal Plaintiffs from Proceeding with Their Federal Litigation — Sanctions Fee Awards: The Factors Used For Calculating A Fee Award To A Prevailing Party Do Not Govern — Under Goodyear, the Relevant Inquiry Is Whether There Is A Sufficient Causal Link Between The Sanctioned Misconduct And The Fees Awarded

Archives
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.
New York Attorneys JHA handles range the gamut of complex financial and commercial litigation and arbitration, including securities, RICO, corporate and contract disputes, credit default swaps, derivatives, and class, mass, and derivative actions. The firm also represents law firms in major disputes.

New York Office

© 2024 Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC  
Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising Notice | Legal Notice