Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

21st Century Defamation — Libel via Internet

In Sundance Image Tech., Inc. v. Cone Editions Press, Ltd., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16356 (S.D. Cal. March 7, 2007), the plaintiff claimed that the defendant posted libelous statements on the Internet about plaintiffs' products, causing plaintiffs' revenues to fall dramatically. How do traditional libel doctrines apply to defamation via web?

1. Single Publication Rule. Under the single publication rule, any single edition of a newspaper or book gives rise to one cause of action for defamation, regardless of how many copies of the newspaper or the book are distributed. The statute of limitations begins to run once the defamatory statement is published, which occurs on the first general distribution of the publication to the public. Republication of the statement gives rise to a new cause of action and a new limitations period. Republication occurs when the new edition is issued. In Sundance, District Judge Jeffrey T. Miller held that the single publication rule applies to statements made on the Internet (citing Traditional Cat Ass'n, Inc. v. Laura Gilbreath, 118 Cal. App. 4th 392 (2004), and Firth v. State 98 N.Y.2d 365 (2002)).

2. Hits. The number of website visitors — in this case, more than 4 million hits — does not affect when the defamatory statement is published for purposes of the single publication rule. (These are effectively newspaper or book readers who pick up the writing after first publication.)

3. Links. Providing links on one web page to statements already published on another, without more, does not republish those statements. ‛Rather, the court finds that such linking is more reasonably akin to the publication of additional copies of the same edition of a book, which is a situation that does not trigger the republication rule.“

4. Web Page Modification. Evidence that defendants modified the headers of the web page on which the challenged statements appear in order to promote a different product may constitute republication of the defamatory statement: ‛A new edition of a book containing previously published defamatory statements gives rise to a fresh claim for libel…. A rational trier of fact could find that the header change, which was made because Defendants wanted to promote [a new product] and stop promoting its original product [albeit still at the expense of plaintiff’s product] … could constitute a new edition of the website since it appears the change was made deliberately and for a substantive purpose: to sell [the new product] and cease selling the original product.“

Share this article:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Recent Posts

RICO and Injunctions: (1) State Court Actions Designed to Perpetuate and Monetize a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable under RICO, Even Though They Are Not Themselves Alleged to Be Predicate Acts [Note: Noerr Pennington Applies in RICO Actions] — (2) Although Civil RICO’s Text and Legislative History Fail to Reveal Any Intent to Override the Provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act, Arbitrations Are Enjoinable Under the “Effective Vindication” Doctrine Where They Operate As a Prospective Waiver of a Party’s Right to Pursue Statutory RICO Remedies — (3) Arbitration Findings May Be Given Collateral Estoppel Effect in a Civil RICO Action — (4) Injunction of Non-Corrupt State Court Litigations That Furthers a RICO Violation Are Enjoinable Under the Anti-Injunction Act’s “Expressly Authorized” Exception — (5) “The Irreparable Harm Requirement Is The Single Most Important Prerequisite For The Issuance Of A Preliminary Injunction” (Good Quote) — (6) When Injunction Is Based on “Serious Questions on the Merits” Rather Than “Likelihood of Success,” Court May Rely on Unverified Pleadings and Attached Exhibits to Assess the Merits, Unless the Opponent Has Raised Substantial Questions (Here, the Opponent Failed to Request an Evidentiary Hearing) — (7) Whether Amended Pleading Moots An Appeal Turns on Whether It Materially Changes the Substantive Basis for the Appeal — (8) Meaning of “In That” (“Used To Introduce A Statement That Explains Or Gives More Specific Information” About A Prior Statement)

Archives